Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Emmett G Donegan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$34kReligion$33kHealth$30kHuman Services$12kInternational$8kArts & Culture$6kFood & Nutrition$2kHousing & Shelter$550Other$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $39k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$999k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARMIN AUFDEHAUER SCHOLARSHIP FUND$14,400
PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOCIATION$14,400
TEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$8,300
SUSAN G KOMEN$8,300
TEXAS WATER MISSION$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $630) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%BOYS TOWN: $150 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $80 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $50 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $50 → 12%CHRISTIAN CUPBOARD: $300 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
SD
OH
NE
VA
MD
AR
TN
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$90k · 35 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
35

Total granted

$90k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+28%

Still filing today

34%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationMembership BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    TEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $14k · revenue +16%
  • GR
    GUADALUPE REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $4k · revenue +211%
  • MS
    MID-TEXAS SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • SP
    SEGUIN PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

The society is a multidisciplinary professional medical organization dedicated to improving human health by advancing nuclear medicine, molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy.

Health
2
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
3
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
5
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
6
Texas Medical Association

The texas medical association (tma), the nation's largest and one of the oldest state medical societies, represents over 59,000 physicians and medical students dedicated to enhancing the health of all texans. in collaboration with 110…

—
7
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
8
American Gastroenterological Association Inc

The purpose of american gastroenterological association, inc. is to promote the common business interests of its members by promoting the image of the industry as a whole; to serve as a central, unified voice for the specialty of…

Community Improvement
9
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
10
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
11
Tarrant County Medical Society

Supporting and advancing the science of medicine and educating its members.

—
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $30,250 · OtherST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCHPARKINSON DISEASE ASSOCIATION: $14,450 · OtherPARKINSON DISEASE ASSOCIATIONARMIN AUFDEHAUER SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $14,400 · OtherARMIN AUFDEHAUER SCHOLARSHIP FUNDTEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $14,150 · OtherTEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITYSALVATION ARMY: $10,450 · OtherSALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherSEGUIN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $5,000 · Other+53 more: $18,365 · Other+53 moreThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $8,300 · HealthThe Susan …GUADALUPE REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $4,150 · HealthGUADALUPE …+3 more: $315 · HealthTexas Water Mission Inc: $8,000 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $330 · International+1 more: $50 · InternationalFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $330 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN CUPBOARD INC: $300 · Human ServicesSEGUIN ART LEAGUE: $500 · Arts & CultureTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $120 · Arts & CultureSeguin Sports Boosters: $325 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $20 · EducationSHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS: $130 · Membership Benefit
Other$112,065Health$12,765International$8,380Human Services$630Arts & Culture$620Education$345Membership Benefit$130

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $14,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $8,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Water Mission Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetGUADALUPE REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $4,150 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMID-TEXAS SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC: $2,150 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSEGUIN ART LEAGUE: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $330 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $330 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSeguin Sports Boosters: $325 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHRISTIAN CUPBOARD INC: $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $165 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS: $130 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $120 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGUADALUPE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGUADALUPE AGRICULTURAL & LIVESTOCK FAIR ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $95 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING: $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEGUIN CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $25 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Texas Water Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds GUADALUPE REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MID-TEXAS SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SEGUIN ART LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds Seguin Sports Boosters ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CUPBOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Food BankTX13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Food Bank · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Emmett G Donegan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Emmett G Donegan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Emmett G Donegan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Emmett G Donegan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Emmett G Donegan’s filings →

More from the funding graph