Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Emily B Andrews Memorial Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$22k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$74kReligion$11kAnimals$9kFood & Nutrition$8kHuman Services$6kHousing & Shelter$5kYouth Development$4k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$137k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PERKINSVILLE BAPTIST CHURCH$5,500
GLEN ALPINE FOOD PANTRY INC$3,500
BENEVOLENT CARE FUND OF COVENANT VILLAGE$3,500
WESTERN PIEDMONT COMMUNITY COLLEGE$2,000
CATAWBA VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$2,000
WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY$2,000
GRAND STRAND HUMANE SOCIETY$1,500
APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOR LAWRENCE JOHN NATALE II$1,000
PURDUE GLOBAL UNIVERSITY FOR JOHN MACKORELL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE CRISIS ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $2k → 10%WESTERN YOUTH NETWORK: $2k → 21%WESTERN YOUTH NETWORK: $2k → 21%WESTERN YOUTH NETWORK: $1k → 21%THE MEETING PLACE MISSION: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$83k · 14 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +155% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
11

Total granted

$83k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+155%
+15%

Still filing today

21%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GRAND STRAND HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +155%
  • GA
    Glen Alpine Food Pantry Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $7k · revenue +120%
  • TW
    The Western Youth Network Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $4k · revenue +313%

Funded once

  • GT
    GEORGETOWN TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOR JOAN MACKORELL
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • CF
    CAPE FEAR COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOR LAURA M ZIEHM
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • PG
    PURDUE GLOBAL UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOR MAREN ROSE EAST: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOR MAREN ROSE EASTPURDUE GLOBAL UNIVERSITY FOR WILLIAM MACKORELL: $7,000 · OtherPURDUE GLOBAL UNIVERSITY FOR WILLIAM MACKORELLWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY FOR REID SIMPSON: $6,000 · OtherWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY FOR REID SIMPSONAPPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOR ANNA LANIER: $6,000 · OtherAPPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOR ANNA LANIERCALDWELL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOR KAYLEE REDWINE: $6,000 · OtherCALDWELL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOR KAYLEE REDWINEAPPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOR LAWRENCE JOHN NATALE II: $6,000 · OtherAPPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOR LAWRENCE JOHN NATALE IIPURDUE GLOBAL UNIVERSITY FOR JOHN MACKORELL: $6,000 · OtherPURDUE GLOBAL UNIVERSITY FOR JOHN MACKORELLHOLY TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5,925 · OtherHOLY TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCHPERKINSVILLE BAPTIST CHURCH: $5,500 · OtherPERKINSVILLE BAPTIST CHURCHNORTH GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY FOR SARAH CISM: $4,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOR AUSTIN BAINES: $4,000 · OtherBENEVOLENT CARE FUND OF COVENANT VILLAGE: $3,500 · OtherHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF NORTHEAST NC: $3,300 · Other+12 more: $24,100 · Other+12 moreGRAND STRAND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $7,425 · AnimalsThe Western Youth Network Inc: $4,325 · Human ServicesCrisis Assistance Ministry: $1,700 · Human ServicesTHE MEETING PLACE ONE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesGlen Alpine Food Pantry Inc: $6,725 · Food & Nutrition
Other$97,325Animals$7,425Human Services$7,025Food & Nutrition$6,725

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRAND STRAND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $7,425 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGlen Alpine Food Pantry Inc: $6,725 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetThe Western Youth Network Inc: $4,325 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCrisis Assistance Ministry: $1,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $1,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBURKE UNITED CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $1,700 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MEETING PLACE ONE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRAND STRAND HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Glen Alpine Food Pantry Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Western Youth Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds Crisis Assistance Ministry ↗
  • Who funds LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds BURKE UNITED CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE MEETING PLACE ONE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Co Ta Huffman-Cornwell FoundationNC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Co Ta Huffman-Cornwell Foundation · Gateway Wellness Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Emily B Andrews Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Emily B Andrews Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Emily B Andrews Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph