Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Emiko Terasaki Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$233k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$185k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.4MCommunity Improvement$351kEducation$50kHealth$50kAnimals$30kRecreation & Sports$5kPhilanthropy$1k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $48k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $185k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY PARTNERS$185,000
NEW YORK ASIAN FILM FESTIVAL$25,000
FILM AT LINCOLN CENTER$23,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GREY SAVE: $5k → 14%JWCH INSTITUTE: $25k → 14%NEW YORK ASIAN FILM FESTIVAL: $25k → 15%ASSN OF PERFORMING ARTS PROFESSIONA: $100k → 14%WBGOORG: $15k → 16%GREY SAVE: $5k → 14%JWCH INSTITUTE: $25k → 14%NEW YORK ASIAN FILM FESTIVAL: $10k → 15%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $5k → 17%WBGOORG: $10k → 16%GREY SAVE: $5k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $185k → 14%NEW YORK ASIAN FILM FESTIVAL: $5k → 15%THE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $35k → 17%WBGOORG: $10k → 16%COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $65k → 14%NEW YORK ASIAN FILM FESTIVAL: $3k → 15%THE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $35k → 17%COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $31k → 14%THE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $25k → 17%COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $30k → 14%NEW YORK CITY BALLET: $25k → 17%COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $25k → 14%FILM AT LINCOLN CENTER: $25k → 17%COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $15k → 14%NEW YORK CITY BALLET: $25k → 17%THE RESCUE TRAIN: $5k → 14%THE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $25k → 17%THE RESCUE TRAIN: $5k → 14%NEW YORK CITY BALLET: $25k → 17%THE RESCUE TRAIN: $5k → 14%NEW YORK CITY BALLET: $25k → 17%FILM AT LINCOLN CENTER: $24k → 17%FILM AT LINCOLN CENTER: $24k → 17%FILM AT LINCOLN CENTER: $24k → 17%FILM AT LINCOLN CENTER: $23k → 17%THE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $6k → 17%FILM AT LINCOLN CENTER: $4k → 17%THE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $2k → 17%JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER: $375k → 17%JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER: $194k → 17%JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER: $125k → 17%JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER: $99k → 17%JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER: $25k → 17%JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER: $10k → 17%NY CITY CENTER: $1k → 17%JAPAN SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $13k → 17%JAPAN SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 37% of The Emiko Terasaki Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Emiko Terasaki Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 12 repeat orgs$109k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$1.8M
$109k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+0%

Still filing today

58%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureAnimalsCommunity ImprovementHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $351k · revenue +169%
  • FA
    FILM AT LINCOLN CENTER INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $123k · revenue +1%
  • NY
    NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $100k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF PERFORMING ARTS PROFESSIONALS
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -2%
  • CP
    CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +0%
  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
2
New York Public Radio

To make the mind more curious, the heart more open, and the spirit more joyful through excellent audio programming that is deeply rooted in new york.

Arts & Culture
3
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
4
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
5
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture
6
Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts Inc

To sustain, encourage, and promote the performing arts and to educate the public with relation thereto. see schedule o for continuation.

Arts & Culture
7
The Paley Center for Media

Description of organization mission: the paley center for media is the premier institution dedicated to advancing the understanding of media-it's artistic value, social impact and historical importance-for the public and media…

Arts & Culture
8
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
9
Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts

Deeply rooted in our local beverly hills community and influenced by cultural change, the wallis annenberg center for the performing arts, a public-private partnership with the city of beverly hills, strives to be a site for the…

Arts & Culture
10
New York Shakespeare Festival

As the nation's foremost producer of shakespeare and new work, the public theater is dedicated to achieving artistic excellence while developing an american theater that is accessible and relevant to all people through productions of…

Arts & Culture
11
Municipal Art Society of New York

The municipal art society of new york (mas) lifts up the voices of the people in the debates that shape new york's built environment and leads the way to a more livable city from sidewalk to skyline. mas envisions a future in which all new…

Arts & Culture
12
Artpace Inc (Audit)

Artpace san antonio is a nonprofit residency program which supports texas, national, and international artists in the creation of new art. see schedule o for continuation.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jazz At Lincoln Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Greysave Co Rich Pisani. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $826,765 · Arts & CultureJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INCFILM AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $122,950 · Arts & CultureFILM AT LINCOLN CENTER INCASSOCIATION OF PERFORMING ARTS PROFESSIONALS: $100,000 · Arts & CultureASSOCIATION OF PERFORMING ARTS PROFESSIONALSNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $99,610 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC+1 more: $1,062 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $350,870 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERSTHE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $128,400 · OtherTHE METROPOLITAN…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CA…NEW YORK ASIAN FILM FESTIVAL: $43,000 · OtherNEW YORK ASIAN F…WBGOORG: $35,105 · OtherWBGOORGJAPAN SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $15,308 · OtherJAPAN SOCIETY OF…+2 more: $2,030 · OtherJWCH INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 · HealthGREYSAVE CO RICH PISANI: $15,150 · AnimalsTHE RESCUE TRAIN: $15,000 · AnimalsCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsNEW YORK CARES INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$1,150,387Community Improvement$350,870Other$273,843Health$50,000Animals$30,150Recreation & Sports$5,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $826,765 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $350,870 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFILM AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $122,950 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetASSOCIATION OF PERFORMING ARTS PROFESSIONALS: $100,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $99,610 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJWCH INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREYSAVE CO RICH PISANI: $15,150 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetTHE RESCUE TRAIN: $15,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $1,062 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CARES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds FILM AT LINCOLN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF PERFORMING ARTS PROFESSIONALS ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds JWCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREYSAVE CO RICH PISANI ↗
  • Who funds THE RESCUE TRAIN ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CARES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Emiko Terasaki Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Emiko Terasaki Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Emiko Terasaki Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Emiko Terasaki Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Emiko Terasaki’s filings →

    More from the funding graph