Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Elizabeth and Eric Ward Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$663k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$511k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.4MHousing & Shelter$789kHealth$110kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kArts & Culture$21kInternational$20kCrime & Legal$10kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
  • $250k+1 grant · $511k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$511,155
NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION$60,000
LUKE 92$47,800
BEGIN ANEW$20,000
FAITH FAMILY CHURCH$10,000
ANGEL HEART FARM$5,000
BRIGHTSTONE$5,000
CRU$2,560
NAVIGATORS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 41% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%FELLOWSHIP BIBLE: $1.2M → 4%NASHVILL ZOO: $2k → 14%MCCLEAN PRESBYTERIAN: $1k → 6%FAITH FAMILY CHURCH: $10k → 18%FELLOWSHIP BIBLE: $511k → 4%BEGIN ANEW OF MIDDLE TN: $10k → 14%FAITH FAMILY CHURCH: $3k → 18%FELLOWSHIP BIBLE: $260k → 4%BEGIN ANEW OF MIDDLE TN: $10k → 14%FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH: $115k → 4%CRIEVEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH: $255k → 14%LUKE 92: $48k → 4%CRIEVEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH: $200k → 14%FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH - GLOBAL: $100k → 4%CRIEVEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH: $200k → 14%LUKE 92: $33k → 4%CRIEVEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH: $100k → 14%FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH: $75k → 4%MEN OF VALOR: $5k → 14%LUKE 92: $25k → 4%MEN OF VALOR: $5k → 14%FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH - GLOBAL: $75k → 4%LUKE 92 MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 14%LUKE 92: $23k → 4%LUKE 92 MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 14%NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $510k → 14%LUKE 92: $15k → 4%NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $62k → 14%ANGEL HEART FARM: $5k → 4%NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $85k → 14%ANGEL HEART FARM: $5k → 4%NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $60k → 14%ANGEL HEART FARM: $5k → 4%NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $11k → 14%ANGEL HEART FARM: $5k → 4%NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $50k → 14%ANGEL HEART FARM: $5k → 4%NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 14%BEGIN ANEW: $25k → 14%FRIST ART MUSEUM: $6k → 14%BEGIN ANEW: $20k → 14%FRIST ART MUSEUM: $5k → 14%BEGIN ANEW: $20k → 14%FRIST ART MUSEUM: $5k → 14%BEGIN ANEW: $20k → 14%FRIST ART MUSEUM: $5k → 14%BEGIN ANEW: $20k → 14%NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 16 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$4.3M
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+90%

Still filing today

44%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHousing & ShelterReligionCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NR
    NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $789k · revenue +37%
  • AH
    Angel Heart Farm Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +45%
  • FRIST ART MUSEUM
    4× · 2019–2022 · $21k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • HH
    HCA HEALTHCARE HOPE FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $70k
  • TB
    TN BAPTIST MISSION BOARD
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • NZ
    NASHVILLE ZOO INC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Raleigh Rescue Mission Inc

Believing every individual has sacred value, we equip people to impact the world for good through the love of jesus christ.

Human Services
2
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
3
David's House

To provide quality care, facilities, and supportive services for adults with a developmental disability, traumatic brain injury or mental illness. being enabled by god, we strive to provide an intentionally christian environment and…

—
4
The Village At Glencliff

The village at glencliff's mission is to provide a healing community for medically vulnerable, unhoused nashvillians to safely recover, stabilize their lives, and imagine their futures.

Housing & Shelter
5
Bloodwater Mission Inc

Bloodwater mission, inc. (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization registered in nashville, tennessee that operates an international nonprofit that partners with african community-driven organizations to end water and hiv/aids…

Religion
6
David's House Ministries

To provide quality care, facilities and supportive services for adults with a developmental disability, traumatic brain injury or mental illness. being enabled by god, we strive to provide an intentionally christian environment and program…

Housing & Shelter
7
Grace House of Memphis Tennessee

To provide substance abuse treatment and rehabilitation programs to women in-and-around the memphis tennessee area.

—
8
Light of Life Ministries Inc

Light of life transforms lives through the love of christ by providing food, shelter, and hope to men, women, and children experiencing homelessness, poverty, or addiction to restore them as healthy members of our community.

Human Services
9
Nashville Cares

Nashville cares exists to end the hiv epidemic, promote comprehensive sexual health and end sexual health stigmatization and discrimination through prevention, education, treatment, support, advocacy, and strategic partnership.

Health
10
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
11
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
12
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashville Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Luke 92 Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,956,155 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCRIEVEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH: $755,000 · OtherCRIEVEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCHFELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH: $190,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCHFELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH - GLOBAL: $175,000 · OtherLUKE 92: $143,300 · Other+8 more: $159,560 · OtherNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $789,300 · Housing & ShelterNASHVILLE RESCUE MIS…BEGIN ANEW: $105,000 · ReligionAngel Heart Farm Inc: $25,000 · HealthLUKE 92 MINISTRIES INC: $20,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthFRIST ART MUSEUM: $20,500 · Arts & CultureBRIGHTSTONE INC: $15,000 · EducationMEN OF VALOR: $10,000 · Crime & LegalNASHVILLE ZOO INC: $2,000 · Animals
Other$3,379,015Housing & Shelter$789,300Religion$105,000Health$46,000Arts & Culture$20,500Education$15,000Crime & Legal$10,000Animals$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $789,300 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetBEGIN ANEW: $105,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetAngel Heart Farm Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetFRIST ART MUSEUM: $20,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLUKE 92 MINISTRIES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetBRIGHTSTONE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMEN OF VALOR: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNASHVILLE ZOO INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELI'S HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds BEGIN ANEW ↗
  • Who funds Angel Heart Farm Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIST ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds LUKE 92 MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTSTONE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEN OF VALOR ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE ZOO INC ↗
  • Who funds ELI'S HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Dettwiller Foundation · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist Foundation · Memorial Foundation Inc · Hca Healthcare Foundation · Servant Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Elizabeth and Eric Ward Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Elizabeth and Eric Ward Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Elizabeth and Eric Ward Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Elizabeth and Eric Ward Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elizabeth and Eric Ward Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph