Skip to content
The Eleanor Kagi Foundation A Lynn M Legacy at a glance

· Private foundation

The Eleanor Kagi Foundation A Lynn M Legacy

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$711k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$3.8MAnimals$860kSocial Science$381kHealth$100kPublic Safety & Disaster$14k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $342k
  • $250k+1 grant · $711k
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNLV Foundation$711,465
UNLV Foundation$141,500
Heaven Can Wait Animal Society$100,000
St Rose Dominican Health Foundation$100,000
The Animal Foundation$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Eagle Hill School: $50k → 11%Pine Point School: $53k → 9%Nevada Policy Research Institute: $78k → 13%Eagle Hill School: $50k → 11%Pine Point School: $30k → 9%Nevada Policy Research Institute: $70k → 13%Pine Point School: $25k → 9%Nevada Policy Research Institute: $70k → 13%Pine Point School: $15k → 9%Nevada Policy Research Institute: $50k → 13%Pine Point School: $15k → 9%Nevada Policy Research Institute: $34k → 13%Nevada Policy Research Institute: $32k → 13%Nevada Policy Research Institute: $24k → 13%Nevada Policy Research Institue: $24k → 13%UNLV Foundation: $100k → 13%UNLV Foundation: $33k → 13%Heaven Can Wait Society: $75k → 13%Friends of Metro Mounted Unit: $14k → 13%The Animal Foundation: $10k → 13%St Rose Dominican Health Foundation: $100k → 13%Noah's Animal House: $25k → 13%Dr Eugene Kirshbaum Founation: $100k → 13%Western Veterinary Conferece: $50k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.7M · 5 repeat orgs$474k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$4.7M
$364k

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +18%
  • HC
    HEAVEN CAN WAIT ANIMAL SOCIETY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $500k · revenue +147%
  • NP
    NEVADA POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $381k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • DE
    Dr Eugene Kirshbaum Founation
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • HC
    Heaven Can Wait Society
    one grant, 2019 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION: $3,565,119 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATIONNEVADA POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $381,256 · OtherNEVADA POLICY RESEARC…PINE POINT SCHOOL INC: $137,500 · OtherPINE POINT SCHOOL INCDr Eugene Kirshbaum Founation: $100,000 · OtherDr Eugene Kirshbaum F…Individual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant reci…EAGLE HILL FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTSINC: $100,000 · OtherEAGLE HILL FOUNDATION…Heaven Can Wait Society: $75,000 · OtherHeaven Can Wait Socie…Individual grant recipient: $50,000 · Other+2 more: $39,000 · OtherHEAVEN CAN WAIT ANIMAL SOCIETY: $500,000 · AnimalsHEAVEN CAN …+1 more: $10,000 · AnimalsST ROSE DOMINICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Health
Education$3,565,119Other$982,756Animals$510,000Health$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION: $3,565,119 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetHEAVEN CAN WAIT ANIMAL SOCIETY: $500,000 over 5y, 9.8% of budgetNEVADA POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $381,256 over 7y, 8.3% of budgetPINE POINT SCHOOL INC: $137,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetST ROSE DOMINICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEAGLE HILL FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTSINC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEAVEN CAN WAIT ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds PINE POINT SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ST ROSE DOMINICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE HILL FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTSINC ↗
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Eleanor Kagi Foundation A Lynn M Legacy funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Eleanor Kagi Foundation A Lynn M Legacy. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Eleanor Kagi Foundation A Lynn M Legacy?

    Find your warmest path to The Eleanor Kagi Foundation A Lynn M Legacy through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eleanor Kagi Foundation A Lynn M Legacy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home