Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Elder Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

International$77kHealth$35kArts & Culture$30kHuman Services$11kReligion$11kYouth Development$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kEducation$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$600
Median grant
2
States reached
$618k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ROTARY FOUNDATION$11,200
VISABILITY$1,200
PRESBYTERIAN ASSOCIATION$1,100
CLARION HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,100
Individual grant recipient$1,100
RIVER CITY BRASS BAND$1,100
PA ELKS HOME SERVICE$900
PENNSYLVANIA ELKS LEGACY TRUST$900
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL HELP FUND$800
HILLCREST UNITED PRES$800
ASHBURY U METH CHURCH$800
WQED$700
Individual grant recipient$600
YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH$400
LAUREL ARTS$400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEXT STEP CENTER: $430 → 14%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $400 → 11%NEXT STEP CENTER: $400 → 14%NEXT STEP CENTER: $380 → 14%NEXT STEP CENTER: $380 → 14%NEXT STEP CENTER: $380 → 14%NEXT STEP CENTER: $365 → 14%NEXT STEP CENTER: $365 → 14%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $450 → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $410 → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $400 → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $400 → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $400 → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $400 → 11%VISABILITY: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$101k · 29 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
1

Total granted

$101k
$380

Still filing today

34%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    WQED MULTIMEDIA
    7× · 2019–2025 · $5k · revenue +5%
  • TN
    THE NEXT STEP CENTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3k · revenue +1%
  • TL
    THE LEARNING LAMP INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • S
    STAR
    one grant, 2019 · $380

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Whyy Inc

Whyy is the philadelphia region's leading public media provider, serving southeastern pennsylvania, southern new jersey, and all of delaware.

Arts & Culture
2
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
3
Upmc Williamsport

UPMC Williamsport is a subsidiary of UPMC Susquehanna. The mission of UPMC Susquehanna and its subsidiaries is to serve the community by providing outstanding patient care and shaping tomorrow's health care through clinical and…

Health
4
The Children's Institute of Pittsburgh

To heal. to teach. to empower. to amaze.

Education
5
Philadelphia Public Access Corporation

Phillycam provides transformative opportunities for people and communities to express themselves, to learn from each other, and to produce and share media reflective of the experiences of everyday people.

6
Upmc Western Maryland Corporation

The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.

Health
7
Whitaker Center for Science and the Arts

To create a space in our communities through education and cultural experiences that celebrate the joy of discovery and entertainment.

Arts & Culture
8
Pittsburgh Community Broadcasting Corporation

To create and distribute trusted content, build connections and strengthen our community through public media.

Arts & Culture
9
Upmc Carlisle

Upmc carlisle's mission is to serve the community by providing access to outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health care system through clinical and technological innovation, research and education.

Health
10
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

11
The Children's Institute Parent Company

To heal. to teach. to empower. to amaze.

Education
12
Pittsburgh Public Theater Corporation

The mission of pittsburgh public theater is to provide artistically diverse theatrical experiences of the highest quality. pittsburgh public theater also strives to serve, challenge, stimulate, and (continued on schedule o)

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Learning Lamp Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Next Step Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $76,780 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONALIndividual grant recipient — $7,120 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPRESBYTERIAN ASSOCIATION — $7,030 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN ASSOCIATIONPA ELKS HOME SERVICE — $6,040 · OtherPA ELKS HOME SERVICEHILLCREST UNITED PRES — $5,820 · OtherHILLCREST UNITED PRESASHBURY U METH CHURCH — $5,440 · OtherASHBURY U METH CHURCHPA ELKS LEGACY TRUST — $5,140 · OtherPA ELKS LEGACY TRUSTCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL HELP FUND — $4,080 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL HELP FUNDCLARION HISTROICAL SOCIETY — $3,830 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $3,540 · OtherCLARION HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $3,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $3,060 · OtherEASTER SEALS JOHNSTOWN DIVISION — $2,700 · OtherTHE EMMAUS COMMUNITY — $2,700 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT — $2,700 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $2,700 · Other+6 more — $9,080 · Other+6 moreRIVER CITY BRASS BAND INC — $7,030 · Arts & CultureRIVER CITY…WQED MULTIMEDIA — $4,860 · Arts & CultureWQED MULTI…LAUREL ARTS INC — $2,700 · Arts & CultureLAUREL ART…THE MOUNTAIN PLAYHOUSE — $1,570 · Arts & CultureTHE MOUNTA…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $2,860 · Human ServicesTHE NEXT STEP CENTER INC — $2,700 · Human ServicesVISABILITY — $1,200 · Human ServicesTHE LEARNING LAMP INC — $2,700 · EducationTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $1,360 · HealthZIP WITH US INC — $1,130 · HealthFRIENDS OF CAMP SOLES INC — $1,130 · Recreation & Sports
International$76,780Other$74,180Arts & Culture$16,160Human Services$6,760Education$2,700Health$2,490Recreation & Sports$1,130

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $76,780 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER CITY BRASS BAND INC — $7,030 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWQED MULTIMEDIA — $4,860 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $2,860 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEXT STEP CENTER INC — $2,700 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLAUREL ARTS INC — $2,700 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LEARNING LAMP INC — $2,700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOUNTAIN PLAYHOUSE — $1,570 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $1,360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVISABILITY — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF CAMP SOLES INC — $1,130 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetZIP WITH US INC — $1,130 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds RIVER CITY BRASS BAND INC
  • Who funds WQED MULTIMEDIA
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds THE NEXT STEP CENTER INC
  • Who funds LAUREL ARTS INC
  • Who funds THE LEARNING LAMP INC
  • Who funds THE MOUNTAIN PLAYHOUSE
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds VISABILITY
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CAMP SOLES INC
  • Who funds ZIP WITH US INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Johnstown · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Elder Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph