Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Eileen D Brown Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$300
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$10kAnimals$5kHuman Services$5kEnvironment$4kFood & Nutrition$3kHousing & Shelter$3kReligion$3kEducation$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRISWOLD SENIOR CENTER$300
GRISWOLD YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES$300
THE LAST GREEN VALLEY$300
Individual grant recipient$300
ST MARY'S FOOD PANTRY$300
SLATER LIBRARY$300
PAUCHAUG POND WEED CONTROL ASSOCIATION$250
UCONN CAHNR EXTENSION FOUNDATION (FUND 0020542)$250
CT AUDOBON SOCIETY$250
FRIENDS OF PACHAUG FOREST$200
FRANCISCAN FRIARS$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $800) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION: $300 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40k · 53 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

53 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
22

Total granted

$40k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+46%

Still filing today

32%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $850 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LT
    LAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $2k · revenue +51%
  • PO
    PAWS OF WAR INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $1k · revenue ×14
  • SL
    SLATER LIBRARY CORPORATION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $1k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • TF
    TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • HW
    Humane World for Animals Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $265 · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
2
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
3
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
4
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
5
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
8
Women's Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…

Animals
9
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
10
Connecticut Association of Health Care Facilities Inc

The association is the leader in providing services to and advocating for, the state's providers of long-term, subacute, rehabilitative, and assisted living care. additionally, the association serves as a clearing house for information…

—
11
Connecticut Brain Tumor Alliance Inc

This entity is dedicated to providing hope and support for brain tumor patients and caregivers, while advancing public awareness of brain tumors, quality of care, and brain tumor research.

Health
12
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
20/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $2,350 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRANCISCAN FRIARS: $2,300 · OtherFRANCISCAN FRIARSHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2,300 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYST MARY'S FOOD PANTRY: $1,675 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIOR: $1,500 · Other+55 more: $22,495 · Other+55 moreTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $900 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $800 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $700 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $700 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC: $200 · HealthPAWS OF WAR INC: $1,450 · AnimalsKITTY HARBOR: $700 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc: $265 · AnimalsVESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC: $200 · AnimalsCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY: $150 · AnimalsLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC: $2,050 · EnvironmentTHE LAST GREEN VALLEY INC THE LAST GREEN VALLEY INC: $400 · Environment+1 more: $25 · EnvironmentSLATER LIBRARY CORPORATION: $1,300 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $134 · EducationFIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC: $800 · Human ServicesTHE SEEING EYE INC: $500 · Human ServicesUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $550 · Public Benefit
Other$32,620Health$3,300Animals$2,765Environment$2,475Education$1,434Human Services$1,300Public Benefit$550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC: $2,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS OF WAR INC: $1,450 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSLATER LIBRARY CORPORATION: $1,300 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $1,075 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC: $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKITTY HARBOR: $700 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAST GREEN VALLEY INC THE LAST GREEN VALLEY INC: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $265 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $134 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS OF WAR INC ↗
  • Who funds SLATER LIBRARY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KITTY HARBOR ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LAST GREEN VALLEY INC THE LAST GREEN VALLEY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Eileen D Brown Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Eileen D Brown Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • The Last Green Valley Inc the Last Green Valley Inc: 72% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Connecticut Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eileen D Brown’s filings →

More from the funding graph