Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Edwin J Skuller Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$25kFood & Nutrition$21kPhilanthropy$8kYouth Development$6kEducation$5kScience & Tech$4kInternational$2kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$154k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK$2,000
ELE'S PLACE$1,000
GREATER LANSING FOODBANK$1,000
CHARLEVOIX COUNTY COMM FOUNDATION$1,000
GREATER LANSING JEWISH FEDERATION$1,000
FRIENDS OF THE BOYNE DISTRICT LIBRARY$500
MIAMI UNIVERSITY$500
GOOD NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF BOYNE$500
U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING$500
PARK SCHOOL$500
HADASSAH$250
LITTLE TRAVERSE CONSERVACY$250
TEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL$250
WINGS OF MERCY$250
SELBY BOTANICAL GARDENS$125
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%HBS FUND: $250 → 8%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $1k → 6%PARK SCHOOL: $500 → 13%HADASSAH: $1k → 17%FRIENDS OF THE BOYNE DISTRICT LIBRARY: $500 → 9%LITTLE TRAVERSE CONSERVACY: $250 → 9%CHARLEVOIX COUNTY COMM FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING: $500 → 14%ELE'S PLACE: $2k → 16%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $500 → 12%HBS FUND: $250 → 8%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $500 → 6%PARK SCHOOL: $500 → 13%HADASSAH: $250 → 17%GOOD NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF BOYNE: $500 → 9%LITTLE TRAVERSE CONSERVACY: $250 → 9%U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING: $500 → 14%ELE'S PLACE: $1k → 16%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $500 → 12%HBS FUND: $250 → 8%PARK SCHOOL: $250 → 13%U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING: $500 → 14%ELE'S PLACE: $1k → 16%U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING: $500 → 14%ELE'S PLACE: $1k → 16%U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING: $300 → 14%ELE'S PLACE: $1k → 16%U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING: $300 → 14%ELE'S PLACE: $500 → 16%U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING: $300 → 14%U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING: $300 → 14%U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING: $300 → 14%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $3k → 16%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $3k → 16%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $3k → 16%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $3k → 16%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $3k → 16%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $3k → 16%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $2k → 16%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $2k → 16%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $2k → 16%GREATER LANSING JEWISH FEDERATION: $1k → 16%GREATER LANSING JEWISH FEDERATION: $1k → 16%GREATER LANSING JEWISH FEDERATION: $1k → 16%GREATER LANSING JEWISH FEDERATION: $1k → 16%GREATER LANSING JEWISH FEDERATION: $1k → 16%GREATER LANSING JEWISH FEDERATION: $1k → 16%GREATER LANSING JEWISH FEDERATION: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$69k · 13 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

$69k
$575

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-24%
0%

Still filing today

38%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEnvironmentArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k
  • GL
    GREATER LANSING FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +37%
  • GL
    Greater Lansing Jewish Welfare Federation
    7× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue -38%

Funded once

  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $175
  • OE
    OKEMOS EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $100 · revenue -2%
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF LANSING FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Lansing Destination Development Foundation
Community Improvement
2
Little Traverse Conservancy Conservation Trust

To protect scenic and natural lands in northern Michigan.

—
3
Michigan Urban Farming Initiative

To engage members of the Michigan community in urban agriculture

Food & Nutrition
4
The Michigan Glass Project
Public Benefit
5
Rescue Mi Nature Now Inc

Rescue MI Nature Now, Inc. is a Michigan Nonprofit Organization committed to cultivating green zones within the communities and empowering neighborhoods through nature-centric educational programs. Through hands-on initiatives, we empower…

Environment
6
Boyne City Booster Foundation

To enhance the educational experience of the students of the boyne city public schools

Education
7
Huron Pines Resource Conservation & Development Council Inc

It is our mission at huron pines to conserve and enhance northern michigan's natural resources to ensure healthy water, protected places and vibrant communities. for alomst 50 years, our work across the forests, lakes and streams of…

Environment
8
Mid-Michigan Land Conservancy

To protect natural, scenic, recreational, and agricultural lands and their natural diversity in mid-michigan so rural landscapes are preserved, and to promote the protection of these lands and their natural diversity through education and…

Environment
9
Michigan Environmental Land Conservancy

To protect land throughout michigan in order to preserve natural ecosystems, protect water quality, provide sanctuaries for wildlife and benefit present and future generations. we serve as an intermediary and maintain acquired properties…

Environment
10
Les Cheneaux Foundation

PreservationinStateofMichigannaturalareas,whichbenefitandareaccessibletopublic.Inordertopreserveandprotectthesenaturalareas,whichincludeprairies,savannas,ravinesandwoodlandsandwetlandsopentopublic.

—
11
Barryton Area Mobile Food Pantry

Food distribution through a mobile food pantry.

Food & Nutrition
12
Feeding America West Michigan

We gather and distribute food to relieve hunger and increase food security in west michigan and the upper peninsula. contributions and net assets consist primarily of donated food for distribution.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Lansing Jewish Welfare Federation; the most unlike its peers is Wings of Mercy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
3/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $23,038 · OtherCONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEKGreater Lansing Jewish Welfare Federation: $6,500 · OtherGreater Lansing Jewish Welfare FederationU OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING: $3,500 · OtherU OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERINGMIAMI UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · OtherPARK SCHOOL: $2,000 · OtherHADASSAH: $1,500 · Other+10 more: $4,175 · Other+10 moreGREATER LANSING FOOD BANK: $19,500 · Food & NutritionGREATER LANSING FOOD BANKGOOD NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF BOYNE: $1,350 · Food & NutritionGOOD NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF BO…ELE'S PLACE INC: $6,350 · Youth DevelopmentELE'S PLA…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,500 · InternationalLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $1,200 · EnvironmentThe Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: $125 · EnvironmentWINGS OF MERCY INC: $250 · Human ServicesBOYNE CITIZEN: $100 · Arts & CultureBOYNE HERITAGE CENTER: $100 · Arts & Culture
Other$42,713Food & Nutrition$20,850Youth Development$6,350International$1,500Environment$1,325Human Services$250Arts & Culture$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER LANSING FOOD BANK: $19,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Lansing Jewish Welfare Federation: $6,500 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC: $6,350 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF BOYNE: $1,350 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $1,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS OF MERCY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYNE CITIZEN: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOKEMOS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER LANSING FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Greater Lansing Jewish Welfare Federation ↗
  • Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF BOYNE ↗
  • Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds WINGS OF MERCY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYNE CITIZEN ↗
  • Who funds OKEMOS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYNE HERITAGE CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Edwin J Skuller Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Edwin J Skuller Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edwin J Skuller’s filings →

More from the funding graph