Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Edwin J Skuller Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$25kFood & Nutrition$21kPhilanthropy$8kYouth Development$6kEducation$5kScience & Tech$4kInternational$2kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$154k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK$2,000
GREATER LANSING FOODBANK$1,000
CHARLEVOIX COUNTY COMM FOUNDATION$1,000
ELE'S PLACE$1,000
GREATER LANSING JEWISH FEDERATION$1,000
FRIENDS OF THE BOYNE DISTRICT LIBRARY$500
GOOD NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF BOYNE$500
U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING$500
PARK SCHOOL$500
MIAMI UNIVERSITY$500
WINGS OF MERCY$250
LITTLE TRAVERSE CONSERVACY$250
TEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL$250
HADASSAH$250
SELBY BOTANICAL GARDENS$125
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%HBS FUND: $250 → 8%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $1k → 6%PARK SCHOOL: $500 → 13%HADASSAH: $1k → 17%FRIENDS OF THE BOYNE DISTRICT LIBRARY: $500 → 9%LITTLE TRAVERSE CONSERVACY: $250 → 9%CHARLEVOIX COUNTY COMM FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING: $500 → 14%ELE'S PLACE: $2k → 16%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $500 → 12%HBS FUND: $250 → 8%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $500 → 6%PARK SCHOOL: $500 → 13%HADASSAH: $250 → 17%GOOD NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF BOYNE: $500 → 9%LITTLE TRAVERSE CONSERVACY: $250 → 9%U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING: $500 → 14%ELE'S PLACE: $1k → 16%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $500 → 12%HBS FUND: $250 → 8%PARK SCHOOL: $250 → 13%U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING: $500 → 14%ELE'S PLACE: $1k → 16%U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING: $500 → 14%ELE'S PLACE: $1k → 16%U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING: $300 → 14%ELE'S PLACE: $1k → 16%U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING: $300 → 14%ELE'S PLACE: $500 → 16%U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING: $300 → 14%U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING: $300 → 14%U OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING: $300 → 14%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $3k → 16%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $3k → 16%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $3k → 16%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $3k → 16%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $3k → 16%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $3k → 16%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $2k → 16%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $2k → 16%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $2k → 16%GREATER LANSING JEWISH FEDERATION: $1k → 16%GREATER LANSING JEWISH FEDERATION: $1k → 16%GREATER LANSING JEWISH FEDERATION: $1k → 16%GREATER LANSING JEWISH FEDERATION: $1k → 16%GREATER LANSING JEWISH FEDERATION: $1k → 16%GREATER LANSING JEWISH FEDERATION: $1k → 16%GREATER LANSING JEWISH FEDERATION: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$69k · 13 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

$69k
$575

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-24%
0%

Still filing today

38%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEnvironmentArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k
  • GL
    GREATER LANSING FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +37%
  • GL
    Greater Lansing Jewish Welfare Federation
    7× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue -38%

Funded once

  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $175
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF LANSING FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $100
  • CM
    CAREFREE MEDICAL DENTAL CLINIC
    one grant, 2017 · $100

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Lansing Destination Development Foundation
Community Improvement
2
Little Traverse Conservancy Conservation Trust

To protect scenic and natural lands in northern Michigan.

3
Michigan Urban Farming Initiative

To engage members of the Michigan community in urban agriculture

Food & Nutrition
4
The Michigan Glass Project
Public Benefit
5
Rescue Mi Nature Now Inc

Rescue MI Nature Now, Inc. is a Michigan Nonprofit Organization committed to cultivating green zones within the communities and empowering neighborhoods through nature-centric educational programs. Through hands-on initiatives, we empower…

Environment
6
Boyne City Booster Foundation

To enhance the educational experience of the students of the boyne city public schools

Education
7
Huron Pines Resource Conservation & Development Council Inc

It is our mission at huron pines to conserve and enhance northern michigan's natural resources to ensure healthy water, protected places and vibrant communities. for alomst 50 years, our work across the forests, lakes and streams of…

Environment
8
Mid-Michigan Land Conservancy

To protect natural, scenic, recreational, and agricultural lands and their natural diversity in mid-michigan so rural landscapes are preserved, and to promote the protection of these lands and their natural diversity through education and…

Environment
9
Michigan Environmental Land Conservancy

To protect land throughout michigan in order to preserve natural ecosystems, protect water quality, provide sanctuaries for wildlife and benefit present and future generations. we serve as an intermediary and maintain acquired properties…

Environment
10
Les Cheneaux Foundation

PreservationinStateofMichigannaturalareas,whichbenefitandareaccessibletopublic.Inordertopreserveandprotectthesenaturalareas,whichincludeprairies,savannas,ravinesandwoodlandsandwetlandsopentopublic.

11
Barryton Area Mobile Food Pantry

Food distribution through a mobile food pantry.

Food & Nutrition
12
Feeding America West Michigan

We gather and distribute food to relieve hunger and increase food security in west michigan and the upper peninsula. contributions and net assets consist primarily of donated food for distribution.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Lansing Jewish Welfare Federation and the most unlike its peers is Wings of Mercy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
3/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK — $23,038 · OtherCONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEKGreater Lansing Jewish Welfare Federation — $6,500 · OtherGreater Lansing Jewish Welfare FederationU OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERING — $3,500 · OtherU OF M LSAROSS ENGINEERINGMIAMI UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · OtherPARK SCHOOL — $2,000 · OtherHADASSAH — $1,500 · Other+10 more — $4,175 · Other+10 moreGREATER LANSING FOOD BANK — $19,500 · Food & NutritionGREATER LANSING FOOD BANKGOOD NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF BOYNE — $1,350 · Food & NutritionGOOD NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF BO…ELE'S PLACE INC — $6,350 · Youth DevelopmentELE'S PLA…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $1,500 · InternationalLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc — $1,200 · EnvironmentThe Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc — $125 · EnvironmentWINGS OF MERCY INC — $250 · Human ServicesBOYNE HERITAGE CENTER — $100 · Arts & CultureBOYNE CITIZEN — $100 · Arts & Culture
Other$42,713Food & Nutrition$20,850Youth Development$6,350International$1,500Environment$1,325Human Services$250Arts & Culture$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREATER LANSING FOOD BANK — $19,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Lansing Jewish Welfare Federation — $6,500 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC — $6,350 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF BOYNE — $1,350 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc — $1,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS OF MERCY INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKEMOS EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYNE CITIZEN — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER LANSING FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Greater Lansing Jewish Welfare Federation
  • Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds GOOD NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF BOYNE
  • Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc
  • Who funds WINGS OF MERCY INC
  • Who funds The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc
  • Who funds OKEMOS EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BOYNE HERITAGE CENTER
  • Who funds BOYNE CITIZEN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Edwin J Skuller Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph