Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Edward L Levine Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$207k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$743kPhilanthropy$400kHuman Services$216kAnimals$142kFood & Nutrition$11kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kHealth$8kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $67k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$476k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADATH ISRAEL$75,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF CINCINNATI$50,000
CAROLINA WILDLIFE$30,000
CHABAD JEWISH CENTER$17,000
CHABAD HOUSE UC$10,000
THE CHILDRENS HOME OF CINCINNATI$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
CET$5,000
TALBERT HOUSE$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $216k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TALBERT HOUSE: $5k → 16%TALBERT HOUSE: $5k → 16%THE CHILDRENS HOME OF CINCINNATI: $20k → 16%THE CHILDRENS HOME OF CINCINNATI: $20k → 16%THE CHILDRENS HOME OF CINCINNATI: $20k → 16%THE CHILDRENS HOME OF CINCINNATI: $20k → 16%THE CHILDRENS HOME OF CINCINNATI: $20k → 16%THE CHILDRENS HOME OF CINCINNATI: $20k → 16%THE CHILDRENS HOME OF CINCINNATI: $10k → 16%THE CHILDRENS HOME OF CINCINNATI: $10k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $36k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 10 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against -24% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
-24%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterInternationalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CW
    CAROLINA WILDLIFE CARE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $142k · revenue +123%
  • TC
    The Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio
    8× · 2017–2024 · $140k · revenue +82%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES
    4× · 2017–2020 · $66k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • M2
    Matthew 25 Ministries Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -24%
  • RD
    REAGAN DELANEY TOKES MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -53%
  • RT
    REAGAN TOKES MEMORIAL FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Family Service of the Cincinnati Area

A social service agency, JFS strengthens lives and our diverse community by providing exceptional and transformational human services. Services include: Counseling, Case Management, Financial and Food Support, Home Care, Senior Services,…

Human Services
2
Cincinnati Union Bethel

Empowering women to break the cycles of poverty, addiction, and human trafficking.

Human Services
3
OhioGuidestone

To provide pathways for growth, achievement, and lifelong success.

Health
4
House of Samuel Inc

Foster and Adoption Services

5
Cincinnati's Optimum Residential Environments Inc

Residential & Habilitative Svs. Provide residential and habilitative services to adults with developmental disabilities

Health
6
St Aloysius Orphanage

St. Aloysius Orphanage provides an integrated continuum of trauma responsive care and specialized education to children experiencing significant behavioral health needs. St. Aloysius is a Family Teaching Center that commits its resources…

Human Services
7
Strategies to End Homelessness Inc

Strategies to End Homelessness leads a coordinated community effort to end homelessness in Greater Cincinnati.

Human Services
8
Jewish Cemeteries of Greater Cincinnati Inc

Jewish Cemeteries of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. serves the burial needs of the Greater Cincinnati Jewish community with care and dignity and honors the resting places of our people.

9
The Methodist Home for Children Inc

To build upon the social, physical, emotional and spiritual strengths of children, youth and families and to affirm their worth.

Human Services
10
Jewish Family Service

Jewish Family Service is a nonprofit social service organization that supports people of all faiths as they navigate through lifes's challenges - illness, aging , finanical uncertainty, mental health concerns, family problems, or personal…

11
Agudath Israel of Ohio Inc

To unite all Jews in the spirit of the Torah, by various means, including, but not limited to disseminating information through publications, meetings, and seminars, and by cooperating with other charitable organizations to achieve these…

Human Services
12
Greater Cincinnati Behavioral Health Services

To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Services and the most unlike its peers is Child Life Disaster Relief Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ADATH ISRAEL — $525,000 · OtherADATH ISRAELCHABAD HOUSE UC — $110,000 · OtherCHABAD HOUSE UCCHABAD JEWISH CENTER — $108,000 · OtherCHABAD JEWISH CENTER+5 more — $23,600 · OtherJewish Federation of Cincinnati — $400,000 · PhilanthropyJewish Federation of Cincinna…The Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio — $140,000 · Human ServicesThe Children's …JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $66,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY S…TALBERT HOUSE — $10,000 · Human ServicesCAROLINA WILDLIFE CARE INC — $142,000 · AnimalsCAROLINA W…Matthew 25 Ministries Inc — $10,000 · InternationalREAGAN DELANEY TOKES MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationChild Life Disaster Relief Inc — $3,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$766,600Philanthropy$400,000Human Services$216,000Animals$142,000International$10,000Education$5,000Public Safety & Disaster$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJewish Federation of Cincinnati — $400,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCAROLINA WILDLIFE CARE INC — $142,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetThe Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio — $140,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $66,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMatthew 25 Ministries Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTALBERT HOUSE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREAGAN DELANEY TOKES MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetChild Life Disaster Relief Inc — $3,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Jewish Federation of Cincinnati
  • Who funds CAROLINA WILDLIFE CARE INC
  • Who funds The Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc
  • Who funds TALBERT HOUSE
  • Who funds REAGAN DELANEY TOKES MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Child Life Disaster Relief Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Edward L Levine Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph