Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Eberly Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$329k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$1.7MHousing & Shelter$163kYouth Development$137kPhilanthropy$122kCrime & Legal$100kHealth$48kHuman Services$38kArts & Culture$36kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$7,341
Median grant
5
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF LAW$100,000
CITY MISSION - LIVING STONES$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MDIL EXPANSION$46,667
FOUNDATION FOR FREE ENTERPRISE EDUCATION$28,480
ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE$25,000
PENN STATE - FAYETTE$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH - SSME$15,000
COMMUNITY FDN OF FAYETTE COUNTY PA$10,000
UNIONTOWN AREA HIGH SCHOOL$7,341
CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPS$6,920
COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG FOUNDATION$5,000
CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY$2,900
ARTS CENTER OF COASTAL CAROLINA$2,500
HISTORIC MITCHELVILLE FREEDOM PARK$1,500
DARE EDUCATION FDN$1,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $177k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $3k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $3k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $2k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $2k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1k → 10%CITY MISSION - LIVING STONES: $50k → 17%CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPS: $7k → 10%CITY MISSION-LIVING STONES: $25k → 17%CITY MISSION - LIVING STONES: $25k → 17%CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPS: $3k → 10%CITY MISSION - LIVING STONES: $25k → 17%CITY MISSION-LIVING STONES: $25k → 17%CITY MISSION-LIVING STONES: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
KY
WV
VA
MD
NC
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The Eberly Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Eberly Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 27 repeat orgs$439k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
21

Total granted

$1.8M
$250k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+16%

Still filing today

59%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $189k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    5× · 2018–2023 · $686k · revenue +40%
  • CM
    CITY MISSION - LIVING STONES INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $158k · revenue +106%
  • CM
    Carnegie Mellon University
    7× · 2018–2024 · $143k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR FREE
    one grant, 2018 · $43k
  • WE
    WCCC EDUCATIONAL FDN INC
    one grant, 2018 · $40k
  • CU
    CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
Carleton College

See schedule o.founded in 1866, carleton college is a private, coeducational liberal arts college of 2,007 students located in the historic river town of northfield, minnesota. nationally recognized as the nation's top college for…

Education
4
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
5
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
6
Lycoming College

The mission of lycoming college is to provide a distinguished baccalaureate education in the liberal arts and sciences within a coeducational, supportive, and residential setting.

Education
7
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
8
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
9
Virginia Wesleyan University

Virginia wesleyan university is a fully accredited liberal arts, united-methodist related institution founded in 1961.

—
10
Widener University

Empowering our community of learners to discover and create better futures.

Education
11
Westminster College

The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…

Education
12
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
27/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Carnegie Mellon University: $143,200 · OtherCarnegie Mellon UniversityUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH-GREENSBURG: $120,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH-GREENSBURGPENN STATE - FAYETTE: $100,000 · OtherPENN STATE - FAYETTEUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF LAW: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF LAWIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWESTMORELAND COMMUNITY EDUCATION FDN: $80,000 · OtherWESTMORELAND COMMUNITY EDUCATION FDNPOINT PARK UNIVERSITY: $70,000 · OtherPOINT PARK UNIVERSITYW VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FDN INC: $51,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MDIL EXPANSION: $46,667 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR FREE: $43,000 · OtherVERLAND: $42,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherWCCC EDUCATIONAL FDN INC: $40,000 · Other+26 more: $214,953 · Other+26 moreUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $685,834 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH+5 more: $74,850 · Education+5 moreCITY MISSION - LIVING STONES INC: $157,500 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $10,250 · Human ServicesTHE CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPS: $9,420 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION FOR FREE ENTERPRISE EDUCATION: $136,760 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF FAYETTE COUNTY PA: $51,000 · PhilanthropyERIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $25,000 · Arts & CultureARTS CENTER OF COASTAL CAROLINA: $5,500 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC MITCHELVILLE FREEDOM PARK INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Battlefield Trust: $2,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $265 · Arts & CultureTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $6,000 · International
Other$1,171,320Education$760,684Human Services$177,170Youth Development$136,760Philanthropy$92,000Arts & Culture$35,765International$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $685,834 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITY MISSION - LIVING STONES INC: $157,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $143,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR FREE ENTERPRISE EDUCATION: $136,760 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetPOINT PARK UNIVERSITY: $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF FAYETTE COUNTY PA: $51,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetVERLAND: $42,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetERIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $23,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST END UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER I: $22,512 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCornell University: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $10,250 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSAINT VINCENT COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPS: $9,420 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARTS CENTER OF COASTAL CAROLINA: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMCCLELLANDTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE CO: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFAYETTE COUNTY ASSOC FOR THE BLIND: $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetGENESIS HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetHISTORIC MITCHELVILLE FREEDOM PARK INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBROWNSVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $2,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetAmerican Battlefield Trust: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOROLLA WILD HORSE FUND INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNETWORK FOR ENDANGERED SEA TURTLES N E S T INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetDare Education Foundation: $1,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHERITAGE CLASSIC FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAIN STREET THEATRE COMPANY: $265 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds CITY MISSION - LIVING STONES INC ↗
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR FREE ENTERPRISE EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds POINT PARK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF FAYETTE COUNTY PA ↗
  • Who funds VERLAND ↗
  • Who funds ERIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST END UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER I ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPS ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ARTS CENTER OF COASTAL CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds MCCLELLANDTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE CO ↗
  • Who funds FAYETTE COUNTY ASSOC FOR THE BLIND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Fayette County PaPA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Fayette County Pa · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Eqt Foundation · Community Foundation of the Lowcountry · Scott Foundation Inc · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Eberly Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Eberly Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eberly’s filings →

    More from the funding graph