Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Duffy Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$995k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$4.0MReligion$2.5MEducation$1.1MRecreation & Sports$276kHuman Services$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kFood & Nutrition$31kHousing & Shelter$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $995k
$150,326
Median grant
1
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST WENCESLAUS CHURCH$995,357
ST JOHN PAUL II NEWMAN CENTER$150,326
NEW CASSEL FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MA
CA
CO
NE
MD
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 50% of The Duffy Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Duffy Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 15 repeat orgs$743k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
16

Total granted

$3.2M
$743k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+10%

Still filing today

53%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2023 · $683k · revenue +70%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2021–2023 · $35k · revenue +27%
  • SF
    SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $25k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • CF
    CUES FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $335k · revenue +117%
  • HN
    HOLY NAME MEN'S CLUB - RESTORE THE GLORY
    one grant, 2023 · $151k
  • OP
    OMAHA PARKS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +165%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities Foundation

Support the mission and social services programs of catholic charities of the archdiocese of omaha, inc.

Religion
2
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

—
3
University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

—
4
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
5
Ecumen

We empower individuals and families to confidently navigate aging so that it is a purposeful journey filled with dignity and support.

—
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
7
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
8
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
9
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
10
The Ku Endowment Charitable Gift Fund

To strengthen the University and communities that have touched the lives of KU alumni and friends, the mission of The KU Endowment Charitable Gift Fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable objectives of…

Philanthropy
11
Omaha Sports Commission

The mission of the omaha sports commission is to foster a positive socio-economic impact on and a heightened awareness and image of omaha by attracting, hosting, & supporting amateur sporting events.

Recreation & Sports
12
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Omaha Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mama's House Ministries Fka Heartbeat At 22. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $3,993,506 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC+2 more: $37,700 · PhilanthropyST WENCESLAUS CHURCH: $1,010,357 · OtherST WENCESLAUS CHURCHST JOHN PAUL II NEWMAN CENTER INC: $528,464 · OtherST JOHN PAUL II NEWMAN CENTER INCSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST WENCESLAUS CONFERENCE: $515,300 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST WENCE…ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA: $340,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHAHOLY NAME MEN'S CLUB - RESTORE THE GLORY: $150,701 · OtherHOLY NAME MEN'S CLUB - RESTORE THE GLO…+13 more: $139,200 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $682,938 · EducationUNIVERSITY…Augustine Institute Inc: $26,200 · Education+1 more: $15,200 · EducationCUES FUND: $335,000 · ReligionEWTN PUBLISHING INC: $20,000 · Religion+1 more: $5,000 · ReligionOMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION: $100,161 · EnvironmentAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $35,000 · Human ServicesMAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22: $5,000 · Human ServicesSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW CASSEL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterOMAHA MULTI SPORT COMPLEX: $25,000 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$4,031,206Other$2,684,022Education$724,338Religion$360,000Environment$100,161Human Services$40,000Housing & Shelter$40,000Recreation & Sports$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $3,993,506 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $682,938 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION: $100,161 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAugustine Institute Inc: $26,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOMAHA MULTI SPORT COMPLEX: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $22,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEWTN PUBLISHING INC: $20,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL: $15,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW CASSEL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetMATER FILIUS OF NEBRASKA INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOALITION FOR CANCELED PRIESTS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CUES FUND ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Omaha Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Augustine Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA MULTI SPORT COMPLEX ↗
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds EWTN PUBLISHING INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL ↗
  • Who funds NEW CASSEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MATER FILIUS OF NEBRASKA INC ↗
  • Who funds MAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22 ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR CANCELED PRIESTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationNE13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Duffy Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Duffy Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Duffy Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Duffy Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Duffy Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph