Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Douglas & Tonyia Bolton Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$83k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$62kHealth$59kHuman Services$38kFood & Nutrition$32kArts & Culture$29kYouth Development$23kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kEnvironment$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k29 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLLINGS CANCER CENTER MUSC$24,085
HERITAGE FOUNDATION$7,500
HILTON HEAD BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS$4,400
CHARLESTON GAILLARD CENTER$3,500
SAMARITANS PURSE$3,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$3,000
LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK$3,000
PORT ROYAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$3,000
DAHLIA GROVE$2,643
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG LIBRARY$2,450
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$2,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,000
BLUFFTON SELF HELP$2,000
DEEP WELL PROJECT$2,000
NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH CONNECTION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%SECOND HELPINGS: $2k → 10%SECOND HELPINGS: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
NY
IN
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$304k · 40 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
12

Total granted

$304k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+3%

Still filing today

57%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureAnimalsFood & NutritionEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2021–2025 · $20k · revenue +27%
  • LF
    LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $19k · revenue +11%
  • HH
    HILTON HEAD ISLAND DEEP WELL PROJECT INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $13k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • Feeding America
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +23%
  • SJ
    ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S CANCER
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • AC
    ARTS CENTER OF COASTAL CAROLINA
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harvest Hope Food Bank

Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…

Food & Nutrition
2
Feeding the Carolinas

The mission of the Organization is to coordinate, support, and advocate for member Food Banks across the Carolinas to create lasting solutions to address hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
4
Charleston Habitat for Humanity Inc

Charleston Habitat for Humanitys (CHFH) vision is a world where everyone has a decent place to live. Seeking to put God's love into action, Charleston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope. By…

—
5
Beyond Housing

We strive to serve the community by constructing and rehabilitating homes for affordable homeownership, providing new housing rentals for low to moderate wealth families in south carolina, and providing services that aid in all aspects of…

—
6
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
7
Dorchester Habitat for Humanity Inc

Dorchester habitat for humanity, inc.'s ("dhfh") mission statement is "putting god's love into action by bringing people together building homes and hope." dhfh was founded in 1993 and has built seventy-five (75) homes and three (3)…

—
8
The Charleston Museum

To educate Charleston area residents and visitors about the natural and cultural history of the South Carolina Lowcountry through collections, exhibitions, preservation, conservation, research and related programming.

Arts & Culture
9
Charleston Legal Access

To expand access to legal representation and rights in South Carolina.

Crime & Legal
10
Developmental Disabilities Management Assistance Inc

Carolina hill provides safe and caring emergency shelter and supportive services to homeless families focusing efforts to achieve rapid re-housing and developing skills and resources to maintain it.

Human Services
11
Center for Heirs' Property Preservation

(See Schedule O)

Crime & Legal
12
Hospice & Palliative Care Charlotte Region

Our mission is to relieve suffering and improve the quality and dignity of life through compassionate hospice care at the end of life, palliative care for those with advanced illness, and through community education.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hilton Head Island Deep Well Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dahlia Grove. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
18/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUSC FOUNDATION: $29,995 · OtherMUSC FOUNDATIONHOLLINGS CANCER CENTER MUSC: $27,085 · OtherHOLLINGS CANCER CENTER MUSCHILTON HEAD BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS: $22,653 · OtherHILTON HEAD BOYS & GIRLS CLUBSLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $19,000 · OtherLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INCBLUFFTON SELF HELP INC: $13,000 · OtherBLUFFTON SELF HELP INCHERITAGE FOUNDATION: $12,500 · OtherHERITAGE FOUNDATIONCharleston Collegiate School: $8,100 · OtherTHE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC: $8,088 · Other+31 more: $87,346 · Other+31 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nati…MEMORY MATTERS: $6,000 · Human ServicesMEMORY MATTER…Neighborhood Outreach Connection: $6,000 · Human ServicesNeighborhood …SECOND HELPINGS: $4,000 · Human ServicesSECOND HELPIN…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRI…Woodlawn School: $10,436 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationCHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $3,250 · EducationCHARLESTON GAILLARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION: $7,000 · Arts & CultureCOASTAL DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $4,000 · Arts & CultureARTS CENTER OF COASTAL CAROLINA: $2,500 · Arts & CultureHILTON HEAD ISLAND DEEP WELL PROJECT INC: $13,000 · EnvironmentSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $9,000 · ReligionSECOND HELPINGS INC: $6,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $3,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$227,767Human Services$39,000Education$18,686Arts & Culture$13,500Environment$13,000Religion$9,000Food & Nutrition$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHILTON HEAD ISLAND DEEP WELL PROJECT INC: $13,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBLUFFTON SELF HELP INC: $13,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWoodlawn School: $10,436 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCharleston Collegiate School: $8,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC: $8,088 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLESTON GAILLARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HELPINGS INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORY MATTERS: $6,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNeighborhood Outreach Connection: $6,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDahlia Grove: $5,143 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMIRASOL HEALTH INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Foundation of the Lowcountry: $4,575 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HELPINGS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $4,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $3,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILTON HEAD HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSouth Carolina Aquarium: $2,540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARTS CENTER OF COASTAL CAROLINA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPOCKETS FULL OF SUNSHINE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOVE HOUSE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HILTON HEAD ISLAND DEEP WELL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUFFTON SELF HELP INC ↗
  • Who funds Woodlawn School ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Charleston Collegiate School ↗
  • Who funds THE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON GAILLARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HELPINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMORY MATTERS ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood Outreach Connection ↗
  • Who funds Dahlia Grove ↗
  • Who funds MIRASOL HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Community Foundation of the Lowcountry ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HELPINGS ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL DISCOVERY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HILTON HEAD HUMANE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds South Carolina Aquarium ↗
  • Who funds ARTS CENTER OF COASTAL CAROLINA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Heritage Classic FoundationSC28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Heritage Classic Foundation · Community Foundation of the Lowcountry · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · The Bargain Box · The Church Mouse Thrift Shop Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Berkeley Hall Charitable Foundation · Wexford Foundation · Palmetto Electric Trust · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Marshall Miller Foundation · David W Ellis Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Douglas & Tonyia Bolton Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Douglas & Tonyia Bolton Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Douglas & Tonyia Bolton Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph