Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dorjac Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2019
19
Grants FY2019
4
States reached
$13k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

79% of The Dorjac Foundation’s FY2019 grant dollars went to Youngstown Area Jewish Federation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2019 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
5
’18
5
’19

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Philanthropy$51kCivil Rights$4kInternational$3kHuman Services$3kReligion$2kArts & Culture$2kPublic Benefit$1kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2019 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k18 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$175
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUNGSTOWN AREA JEWISH FEDERATION$12,720
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH$5,175
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$1,200
ISREAL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION$1,025
LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$700
BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART$525
YOUNGSTOWN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$250
FLORIDA LENS EYE CLINIC$200
PELATONIA BIKE CHARITY$200
CONGREGATION RODEF SHOLOM$175
Individual grant recipient$100
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$100
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$100
HADASSH$50
MIAMI CITY BALLET$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ISREAL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%FLORIDA LENS EYE CLINIC: $200 → 11%JAFCO: $100 → 13%MIAMI CITY BALLET: $50 → 15%PELATONIA BIKE CHARITY: $300 → 15%ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1k → 17%BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART: $525 → 19%ISREAL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%FLORIDA LENS EYE CLINIC: $50 → 11%BOCA WEST CANCER RESEARCH UNIT: $150 → 11%DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $125 → 13%MIAMI CITY BALLET: $50 → 15%PALATONIA: $200 → 15%ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1k → 17%BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART: $525 → 19%ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH: $5k → 11%PELATONIA BIKE CHARITY: $200 → 15%ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1k → 17%BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART: $500 → 19%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $100 → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH: $5k → 11%CONGREGATION RODEF SHOLOM: $425 → 19%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $100 → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY: $5k → 11%CONGREGATION RODEF SHOLOM: $250 → 19%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $100 → 17%LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $700 → 11%CONGREGATION RODEF SHOLOM: $175 → 19%LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $700 → 11%RODEF SHOLOM SISTERHOOD: $100 → 19%HADASSAH: $75 → 17%B'NAI TORAH: $1k → 11%RODEF SHOLOM SISTERHOOD: $100 → 19%LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $650 → 11%B'NAI TORAH: $100 → 11%YOUNGSTOWN AREA JEWISH FEDERATION: $13k → 19%YOUNGSTOWN AREA JEWISH FEDERATION: $13k → 19%YOUNGSTOWN AREA JEWISH FEDERATION: $10k → 19%YOUNGSTOWN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $250 → 19%YOUNGSTOWN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $250 → 19%YOUNGSTOWN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $250 → 19%AKIVA ACADEMY: $100 → 19%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $100 → 19%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $100 → 19%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $100 → 19%YWCA: $75 → 19%B'NAI BRITH INTERNATIONAL: $75 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15k · 16 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against -14% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$15k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
-14%

Still filing today

25%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Arts & CultureInternationalPublic BenefitReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IT
    ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +37%
  • BI
    BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +75%
  • CF
    COMMISSION FOR JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER YOUNGSTOWN
    3× · 2017–2019 · $200 · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • VH
    Vets Helping Heroes Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -14%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • P
    PALATONIA
    one grant, 2017 · $200
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Buffalo Inc

Education opportunity for the jewish community

—
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
International Board of Jewish Missions Inc

To minister physically and spiritually to the jewish people.

Religion
4
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
5
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
6
Jewish Federation of Nashville and Middle Tennessee

The jewish federation of nashville is the central voluntary communal organization of the jewish community. through its fund-raising, planning and community relations efforts, either independently or in partnership with other jewish…

Philanthropy
7
Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey

The jewish federation of southern new jersey cares for those in need, enhances jewish life and ensures the continuity of a vibrant jewish community locally, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
8
The Jewish Federation of Sarasota-Manatee Inc

To strengthen jewish life and identity in our community, provide for jewish people in need and promote support for israel.

Philanthropy
9
The Jewish Federation of Nwi Inc

Enriching jewish life in northwest indiana, in israel and around the world through service, programming, advocacy and fundraising.

—
10
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

—
11
Jewish Federation of Greater Kansas City

To sustain and enhance jewish life at home and around the world.

Philanthropy
12
Jewish Childrens Museum

To further jewish historical education among youths

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit; the most unlike its peers is Vets Helping Heroes Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNGSTOWN AREA JEWISH FEDERATION: $35,220 · PhilanthropyYOUNGSTOWN AREA JEWISH FEDERATIONJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $15,400 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC+1 more: $25 · PhilanthropyANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $3,600 · OtherANTI DEFAMATION LEAG…LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $2,050 · OtherLEVIS JEWISH COMMUNI…B'NAI TORAH: $1,300 · OtherB'NAI TORAHIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant rec…CONGREGATION OHEV BETH SHOLOM: $850 · OtherCONGREGATION OHEV BE…YOUNGSTOWN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $750 · OtherYOUNGSTOWN JEWISH CO…PELATONIA BIKE CHARITY: $500 · Other+15 more: $2,150 · Other+15 moreISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC: $3,075 · InternationalBUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART: $1,550 · Arts & CultureMIAMI CITY BALLET INC: $150 · Arts & CultureVets Helping Heroes Inc: $1,075 · Public BenefitCOMMISSION FOR JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER YOUNGSTOWN: $200 · Religion
Philanthropy$50,645Other$12,200International$3,075Arts & Culture$1,700Public Benefit$1,075Religion$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNGSTOWN AREA JEWISH FEDERATION: $35,220 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $15,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC: $3,075 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART: $1,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVets Helping Heroes Inc: $1,075 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMISSION FOR JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER YOUNGSTOWN: $200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI CITY BALLET INC: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNGSTOWN AREA JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART ↗
  • Who funds Vets Helping Heroes Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMISSION FOR JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER YOUNGSTOWN ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI CITY BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fibushendricks Family FoundationOH15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fibushendricks Family Foundation · Donald M & Barbara L Werner Family Foundation · Frances Schermer Charitable Trust 41-46496008 · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dorjac Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dorjac Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dorjac’s filings →

    More from the funding graph