Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Don and Leslie Ritter Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$101k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$891kYouth Development$83kArts & Culture$32kHealth$15kRecreation & Sports$12kPhilanthropy$3kCommunity Improvement$2kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$11,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$50,250
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY$18,305
NANCY LIEBERMAN CHARITIES$15,200
MARIETTA COLLEGE$11,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
DALALS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$1,000
COLLIN COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $325) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YMCA OF METRO DALLAS: $250 → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $75 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
KY
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 10 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
15

Total granted

$1.0M
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
-4%

Still filing today

70%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    Marietta College
    5× · 2020–2024 · $580k · revenue +30%
  • PE
    PARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
    4× · 2021–2024 · $233k · revenue +29%
  • Southern Methodist University
    5× · 2020–2024 · $61k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MEDCIAL CTR FDN
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • BS
    BAYLOR SCOTT WHITE
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER N TEXAS
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Episcopal Foundation of Dallas

The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.

Religion
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Dunwoody College of Technology

Dunwoody college changes lives by building opportunities for graduates to have successful careers, to develop into leaders and entrepreneurs, and to engage in "the better performance of life's duties." quote is from the last will and…

Education
5
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
6
Saint Peter's University

See schedule o.saint peter's university, inspired by its jesuit, catholic identity, commitment to individual attention, and grounding in the liberal arts, educates a diverse community of learners in undergraduate, graduate and professional…

Education
7
Seattle Foundation

Seattle foundation's mission is to ignite powerful and rewarding philanthropy to make greater seattle a stronger, more vibrant community for all.

Philanthropy
8
Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education
9
Harvey Mudd College

HMC seeks to educate engineers, scientists, and mathematicians well versed in all of these areas and in the humanities, social sciences and the arts so that they may assume leadership in their fields with a clear understanding of the…

Education
10
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
11
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
12
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dallas Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Whiskey and Wishes Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Marietta College: $579,695 · EducationMarietta CollegeNANCY LIEBERMAN CHARITIES: $79,647 · EducationNANCY LIEBERMAN CHARITIESSouthern Methodist University: $61,184 · EducationSouthern Methodist University+1 more: $13,788 · EducationPARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $233,250 · OtherPARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $20,150 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHILDREN'S MEDCIAL CTR FDN: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,218 · Other+13 more: $16,947 · Other+13 moreDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $5,210 · Arts & CultureWHISKEY AND WISHES INC: $3,096 · Youth DevelopmentTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $1,905 · PhilanthropySEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $1,250 · HealthYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $250 · Human ServicesThe Family Place: $75 · Human Services
Education$734,314Other$297,565Arts & Culture$5,210Youth Development$3,096Philanthropy$1,905Health$1,250Human Services$325

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarietta College: $579,695 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $233,250 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNANCY LIEBERMAN CHARITIES: $79,647 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $61,184 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSIGMA KAPPA FOUNDATION: $13,788 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $5,210 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWHISKEY AND WISHES INC: $3,096 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $1,905 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Family Place: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marietta College ↗
  • Who funds PARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NANCY LIEBERMAN CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds SIGMA KAPPA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum ↗
  • Who funds WHISKEY AND WISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DALLAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Family Place ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Don and Leslie Ritter Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Don and Leslie Ritter Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Don and Leslie Ritter Family Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Don and Leslie Ritter Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Don and Leslie Ritter Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph