Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dolphin Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2023
24
Grants FY2023
13
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$65kCivil Rights$39kHuman Services$17kCommunity Improvement$13kEnvironment$8kPublic Benefit$5kReligion$2kEducation$1kOther$0
02FY2023 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
13
States reached
$82k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
COMMUNITY POWER NETWORK$1,000
US CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK$1,000
DIVERSE CITY FUND$1,000
ALABAMA INTERFAITH POWER & LIGHT$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
THOUSAND CURRENTS$1,000
CATALYST PROJECT$500
APPALACHIAN CITIZENS LAW CTR$500
SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND$500
POWERSHIFT NETWORK$500
TAPROOT$500
CENTER FOR ENERGY EDUCATION$500
NC JUSTICE CENTER$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TIDES CENTER: $25k → 10%NC JUSTICE CENTER: $500 → 8%TIDES CENTER: $22k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
PA
CA
KY
MD
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$34k · 15 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
14

Total granted

$34k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+18%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EnvironmentCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsPublic BenefitPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER
    3× · 2017–2019 · $5k · revenue +21%
  • SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue ×25
  • PS
    POWER SHIFT NETWORK
    4× · 2017–2023 · $3k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • Y
    YWCA
    one grant, 2018 · $16k
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -46%
  • TW
    THE WATERSHED CENTER INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…

Crime & Legal
2
Powerswitch Action

Powerswitch action is a national network forging collective democracy and economies in our cities and states, together with our 21 grassroots affiliates.

Community Improvement
3
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
4
Forward Justice Action Network

Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…

Human Services
5
Climate Jobs National Resource Center Inc

To educate workers and the public about policies that will build a clean energy economy at the scale climate science demands, create good union jobs, and create more equitable communities.

Environment
6
Alliance for Climate Transition Inc

ACT leads the just, equitable and rapid transition to a clean energy future and diverse climate economy.

Community Improvement
7
Coalition for Green Capital D/B/a American Green Bank Consortium

Cgc operates as a nonprofit financial institution that invests directly and through partners to transform financial markets by using public and private investing to accelerate the deployment of projects that strengthen the grid, reduce…

Environment
8
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
9
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
10
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
11
Climate Jobs National Resource Center Action Fund Inc

To advocate for a clean energy economy at the scale climate science demands, create good union jobs, and create more equitable communities.

Environment
12
Nw Energy Coalition

The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Community Change; the most unlike its peers is Southerners On New Ground Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YWCA: $15,800 · OtherYWCAIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPOWER SHIFT NETWORK: $3,300 · OtherPOWER SHIFT NETWORKIndividual grant recipient: $3,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNEW ECONOMY COALITION INC: $2,500 · OtherGEORGIA WAND: $2,000 · OtherENERGY ACTION COALITION: $2,000 · OtherSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC: $2,500 · Other+24 more: $17,575 · Other+24 moreTIDES CENTER: $46,545 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesPROTEUS FUND INC: $31,000 · EducationPROTEUS FUND INCTIDES FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUND…RESOURCE GENERATION INC: $1,500 · PhilanthropyRESOURCE GE…MOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER: $5,206 · Community ImprovementALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY: $1,000 · Community ImprovementTHE WATERSHED CENTER INC: $1,000 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE: $270 · Community ImprovementSOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE: $3,500 · Public BenefitKENTUCKY COALITION INC: $1,000 · Public BenefitHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $1,500 · EnvironmentUS CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK: $1,000 · EnvironmentTHE CENTER FOR ENERGY EDUCATION FKA SOLAR CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE: $500 · EnvironmentCLIMATE AND ENERGY PROJECT INC: $500 · EnvironmentDREAMORG: $500 · Environment
Other$58,975Human Services$47,045Education$31,000Philanthropy$16,500Community Improvement$7,476Public Benefit$4,500Environment$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTIDES CENTER: $46,545 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROTEUS FUND INC: $31,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER: $5,206 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPOWER SHIFT NETWORK: $3,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ECONOMY COALITION INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKENTUCKIANS FOR THE COMMONWEALTH INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRESOURCE GENERATION INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WATERSHED CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUS CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY COALITION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN CITIZENS LAW CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR ENERGY EDUCATION FKA SOLAR CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMATE AND ENERGY PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDREAMORG: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT SOUTH INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE: $270 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew York Communities For Change Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PROTEUS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds POWER SHIFT NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ECONOMY COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKIANS FOR THE COMMONWEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds RESOURCE GENERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE WATERSHED CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds US CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN CITIZENS LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR ENERGY EDUCATION FKA SOLAR CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Windward FundDC19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Windward Fund · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Working Families Organization Inc · Solutions Project Inc · Rockefeller Family Fund Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · Tides Foundation · United States Energy Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Flock Inc · The Partnership Project Inc · Mertz Gilmore Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dolphin Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dolphin Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Dolphin Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Dolphin Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dolphin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph