Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dolores & Donald Burnett Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$218k
Granted FY2023
21
Grants FY2023
10
States reached
$74k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2023.

Religion$134kCrime & Legal$118kHuman Services$69kHousing & Shelter$45kAnimals$32kHealth$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kEducation$9kOther$0
02FY2023 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k16 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $137k
$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN ORLAND PARK$73,635
SEA HAVEN INC$63,000
HOPE HARBOR HOME INC$21,500
PROVEDENCE HOME$17,500
PAWS PLACE INC$10,500
UNCHAINED AMERICA INC$9,500
AMERICAN RED CROSS CAPE FEAR CHAPTE$3,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER AND SERVI$3,000
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$2,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL$2,000
ADOPT AN ANGEL$2,000
TLC ANIMAL SHELTER$1,000
ELIM CHRISTIAN SERVICES$1,000
OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC$1,000
KEMMERER VILLAGE FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT: $1k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT: $1k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT: $1k → 12%MISCERACORDIA HOME: $2k → 14%MISCERACORDIA HOME: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NE
TN
NC
SC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$429k · 21 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
1

Total granted

$429k
$1k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
AnimalsInternationalEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SEA HAVEN INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $118k · revenue +43%
  • HH
    Hope Harbor Home Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $49k · revenue +24%
  • PP
    PAWS PLACE INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $14k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • SS
    SOUTH SUBURBAN CRISIS CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Palm Beach County

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
2
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
3
Noah's Animal House Foundation

To remove the "no pets allowed" sign on the doors of domestic violence shelters. women should not have to choose between leaving their abuser and leaving their pets behind to be abused.

Animals
4
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
5
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
6
Habitat for Humanity Inc

Habitat seeks to eliminate poverty housing from the world and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.

—
7
Habitat for Humanity for Ri South County Inc

To reduce substandard housing by creating simple decent affordable homes in partnership with people in need in order to improve quality of life and provide greater security.

—
8
K9 Hurricane's Heroes Inc

K9 hurricane's heroes, a federally recognized, non-profit organization, provides "retired law enforcement and military dogs" with subsidized veterinary care so they can live a long and healthy life. often these incredible dogs are the…

Animals
9
Homeward Animal Shelter Inc

To care for, protect and place animals for adoption in life long homes, and to prevent cruelty to animals by educating our community in the proper and humane care of all animals.

Animals
10
Women's Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…

Animals
11
Habitat for Humanity International Chemung County

Chemung county habitat is dedicated to eliminating substandard housing locally and worldwide through constructing, rehabilitating and preserving homes; by advocating for fair and just housing policies; and by providing training and access…

—
12
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homes for Our Troops Inc; the most unlike its peers is Unchain America Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
14/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN ORLAND PARK: $133,635 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN ORLAND PARKHope Harbor Home Inc: $48,500 · OtherHope Harbor Home IncPROVEDENCE HOME: $35,500 · OtherPROVEDENCE HOMEAMERICAN RED CROSS CAPE FEAR CHAPTE: $12,000 · OtherDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER AND SERVI: $10,000 · OtherUNCHAIN AMERICA INC: $9,500 · Other+7 more: $23,000 · Other+7 moreSEA HAVEN INC: $118,000 · Crime & LegalSEA HAVEN INCPAWS PLACE INC: $13,500 · AnimalsADOPT AN ANGEL: $6,000 · AnimalsKEMMERER VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationELIM CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $4,000 · EducationHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $6,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA: $2,000 · InternationalTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · Public Safety & DisasterWOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA HOME: $3,000 · Human Services
Other$272,135Crime & Legal$118,000Animals$19,500Education$9,000International$8,000Public Safety & Disaster$7,000Human Services$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEA HAVEN INC: $118,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetHope Harbor Home Inc: $48,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetPAWS PLACE INC: $13,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetUNCHAIN AMERICA INC: $9,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADOPT AN ANGEL: $6,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetKEMMERER VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetELIM CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEA HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Hope Harbor Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds PAWS PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNCHAIN AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ADOPT AN ANGEL ↗
  • Who funds KEMMERER VILLAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ELIM CHRISTIAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA HOME ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dolores & Donald Burnett Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dolores & Donald Burnett Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dolores & Donald Burnett’s filings →

More from the funding graph