· Private foundation
The Djr Trust-Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $43k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST ANDREWS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $19,500 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| COMMITTEE TO PROJECT JOURNALISTS | $10,000 |
| UNITED WAY | $7,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $5,000 |
| MOBILE LOAVES AND FISHES | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| THE ANN RICHARDS SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| HORSEABILITY | $2,000 |
| REPORTERS COMMITTEE TO PROTECT 1ST AMENDMENT | $2,000 |
| HEROES ON THE WATER | $2,000 |
| WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT | $2,000 |
| SHOAL CREEK CONSERVANCY | $1,500 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CTCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +28%
- MLMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC6× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +94%
- WMWilliam Marsh Rice University2× · 2017–2018 · $12k · revenue +104%
Funded once
- ASAFRICANDIASPORA STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN RATHER PRIZE 2022one grant, 2022 · $40k
- LDLAKE DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2017 · $10k
- TETRINITY EDWARDS AQUIFER PROTECTION ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2018 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Coastal bend bays & estuaries program is dedicated to protecting and restoring bays and estuaries of the texas coastal bend. coastal bend bays and estuaries remain a vital part of the environmental and economic landscape by preserving and…
Creating markets for innovative water resiliency projects.
Aaro, a non-partisan thought leader for central texas, has worked behind the scenes on critical regional issues since 1980. the membership is an intentionally diverse group of central texas leaders drawn from business, industry, education,…
Fish and wildlife conservation and outreach including public awareness. Fifteen public relations campaign on social media with over 7.5 million impressions. Twenty plus speaking engagements to a variety of conservation organizations…
The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…
The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.
To guarantee all americans quality places to hunt and fish.
The forty first foundation supports and advances the university of texas at austin in its pursuit of excellence. we work closely with the office of the president to identify, fund, and implement strategic initiatives that enhance the…
To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.
Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation (TPWF) is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization thatadvances Texas proud outdoor traditions through meaningful, high-impact programs,partnerships, and a wide range of projects that conserve and enhance our…
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Houston Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Alliance of Community Trainers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
- Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds William Marsh Rice University ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL TEXAS PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION ↗
- Who funds EL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EAST CENTRAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SPRING BRANCH EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FLATSWORTHY INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE OF COMMUNITY TRAINERS ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds The Ann Richards School Foundation ↗
- Who funds Save Our Springs Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE TEXAS DEMOCRACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Shoal Creek Conservancy ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds CATSKILL MOUNTAINKEEPER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 · St David's Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Tejemos Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Mfi Foundation · Shield-Ayres Foundation · Jacob and Terese Hershey Foundation · The Cynthia & George Mitchell Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Texas Instruments Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Djr Trust-Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc — 46% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.