Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Diebold Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$4.4MReligion$4.2MEducation$756kArts & Culture$705kRecreation & Sports$537kYouth Development$435kPublic Safety & Disaster$415kHuman Services$242kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $506k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$4,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANBURY HOSPITALNW MILFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$750,000
UCONN FOUNDATION$615,500
THE BOWERY MISSION$250,000
SOUTHAMPTON YOUTH SERVICES$180,849
Individual grant recipient$100,000
CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT$100,000
AFTER SCHOOL ARTS PROGRAM INC$75,000
EAST END HOSPICE$50,000
JUSTICE DANCE PERFORMACE PROJECT$25,000
SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC$25,000
LITTLE BRITCHES THERAPEUTIC RIDING$20,000
LITCHFIELD HILLS CHORE SERVICES$10,000
ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION$4,000
LOST MEADOW MULE REFUGE INC$4,000
PILOTS TO THE RESCUE$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $968k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EAST END HOSPICE: $50k → 7%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $100k → 15%EAST END HOSPICE: $50k → 7%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $100k → 15%EAST END HOSPICE: $50k → 7%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $100k → 15%EAST END HOSPICE: $27k → 7%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $100k → 15%SOUTHAMPTON YOUTH SERVICES: $181k → 7%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC: $25k → 9%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC: $25k → 9%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC: $25k → 9%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC: $25k → 9%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC: $25k → 9%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC: $25k → 9%LOAVES ADN FISHES HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $50k → 9%LOAVES AND FISHES HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
CT
NE
KY
VA
MD
AR
TN
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 27 repeat orgs$648k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
14

Total granted

$11M
$423k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+18%

Still filing today

63%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $225k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsEnvironmentEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Christian Herald Association Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $3.7M · revenue +60%
  • CC
    CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1.0M · revenue +80%
  • HI
    HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $450k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERIC CT RIVER COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • NH
    NUVANCE HEALTH
    one grant, 2022 · $55k
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    one grant, 2022 · $52k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
2
Connecticut Aeronautical Historical Association Inc

The new england air museum's mission is to preserve and present the story of aviation and aerospace, with an emphasis on new england's role, and the genius and inspiration that made it possible. the museum also seeks to inspire young…

Arts & Culture
3
Dutchess Land Conservancy Inc

Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…

Environment
4
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
5
Longneck Manor Conservation Foundation

To create memorable guest experiences which promote actions to help save species, habitats, and the communities who share those same landscapes

Animals
6
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
7
Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation

Northeast wilderness trust is a regional land trust working to preserve and restore forever-wild landscapes for nature and people in new york, vermont, new hampshire, maine, massachusetts and connecticut.

Environment
8
Wilton Land Conservation Trust

Protecting, enhancing and conserving open spaces encompassing meadows, woodlands, wetlands, and waterways in the town of wilton ct.

Environment
9
Southbury Land Trust Inc

The primary exempt purpose is the preservation of natural resources in southbury, connecticut including associated water, woodlands, open spaces, and animal and planet life therein

Environment
10
Thompson Park Conservancy Inc

Zoo new york, by example and action, provides knowledge and motivation for conserving nature in new york state through science-based natural and cultural experiences.

Arts & Culture
11
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
12
Wamc

Wamc is chartered by the new york state board of regents to "furnish, prepare and present non-profit and non-commercial educational, instructional and cultural radio programs and also non-profit and non-commercial programs (wamc's mission…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Connecticut Land Conservancy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Coolspring Power Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
17/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DANBURY HOSPITALNW MILFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,750,000 · OtherDANBURY HOSPITALNW MILFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDA…CT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $750,000 · OtherCT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN RED CROSS CT CHAPTER: $365,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS CT CHAPTER+36 more: $1,140,471 · Other+36 moreChristian Herald Association Inc: $3,710,000 · ReligionChristian Herald Association IncCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $1,000,000 · HealthCONNECTIC…CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $400,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN…SOUTHAMPTON YOUTH SERVICES INC: $180,849 · Human ServicesSOUTHAMPT…East End Hospice Inc: $177,000 · Human ServicesEast End …SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesSUSAN B A…LOAVES & FISHES HOSPITALITY HOUSE INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesLOAVES & …THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC: $735,500 · Education+2 more: $5,000 · EducationAFTER SCHOOL ARTS PROGRAM INC: $325,000 · Arts & CulturePILOBOLUS INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureJUSTICE DANCE PERFORMANCE PROJECT INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureCoolspring Power Museum: $72,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN MURAL PROJECT INC: $62,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $15,000 · Arts & CultureHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $450,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$4,505,471Religion$3,710,000Health$1,000,000Human Services$967,849Education$740,500Arts & Culture$649,000Recreation & Sports$450,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChristian Herald Association Inc: $3,710,000 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC: $735,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $450,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $400,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAFTER SCHOOL ARTS PROGRAM INC: $325,000 over 7y, 8.8% of budgetSOUTHAMPTON YOUTH SERVICES INC: $180,849 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetEast End Hospice Inc: $177,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC: $150,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetLITTLE BRITCHES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $110,000 over 6y, 8.3% of budgetPILOBOLUS INC: $100,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJUSTICE DANCE PERFORMANCE PROJECT INC: $75,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetCoolspring Power Museum: $72,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetAMERICAN MURAL PROJECT INC: $62,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetLITCHFIELD HILLS CHORE SERVICE: $60,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES HOSPITALITY HOUSE INC: $60,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $52,265 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARK CENTRAL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetTHE LIVESTOCK CONSERVANCY INC: $19,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetQUINEBAUG VALLEY ENGINEERS: $15,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetPRATT NATURE CENTER INC: $13,040 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY CULINARY SCHOOL OF NW CT LLC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOPERATION FINALLY HOME: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIGER HAVEN INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLITERACY VOLUNTEERS ON THE GREEN: $3,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTHOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Christian Herald Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds AFTER SCHOOL ARTS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHAMPTON YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds East End Hospice Inc ↗
  • Who funds SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE BRITCHES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
  • Who funds PILOBOLUS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST CONNECTICUT LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE DANCE PERFORMANCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Coolspring Power Museum ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MURAL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds LITCHFIELD HILLS CHORE SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES HOSPITALITY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds PARK CENTRAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LIVESTOCK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds QUINEBAUG VALLEY ENGINEERS ↗
  • Who funds PRATT NATURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CULINARY SCHOOL OF NW CT LLC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Connecticut Community FoundationCT32.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Connecticut Community Foundation · The Ellen Knowles Harcourt Foundation · The Kestrel Foundation · Northwest Connecticut Community Foundation Inc · Murray & Susan Haber Charitable Foundation · Union Savings Bank Foundation Inc · Connecticut Humanities Council Inc · Fjc · Robert G and Marguerite M Derx Foundation · Dungannon Foundation Inc · Northwest Community Bank Foundation Inc · American Savings Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Diebold Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Diebold Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Northwest Connecticut Land Conservancy Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Connecticut Children's Medical Center: 5% of income from government
  • Justice Dance Performance Project Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Park Central Inc: 2% of income from government
  • American Mural Project Inc: 1% of income from government
  • After School Arts Program Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Pilobolus Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Little Britches Therapeutic Riding Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Susan B Anthony Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pratt Nature Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Diebold Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Diebold Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Diebold’s filings →

More from the funding graph