· Private foundation
The Deer Valley Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LES CHENEAUX COM FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| ETHAN LINBERG FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| AWT FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| PETER MAURIN CENTER | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| LES CHENEAUX YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| HAWKEN SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $1,000 |
| SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR | $1,000 |
| ST FRANCIS XAVIER SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| KIRTLAND AREA SERV COUNCIL | $500 |
| WORLD VISION | $500 |
| KIRTLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HSHAWKEN SCHOOL4× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +76%
- HSHESSEL SCHOOL HOUSE CORPORATION5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +90%
- SOSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION4× · 2018–2023 · $5k · revenue +224%
Funded once
- CCCAIgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +44%
- WWWACAP World Association for Children and Parentsone grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -30%
- NGNo Greater Sacrifice Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +76%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
Childfund alliance is a global network of 11 child-focused development and humanitarian organizations working in more than 70 countries. we help nearly 30 million children and their families to overcome poverty and the underlying…
God's littlest angels facilitates the development of healthy kids, empowered families, and stronger communities while sharing the hope and love of jesus christ.
See schedule o.to provide and coordinate innovative, high quality, community-based care for individuals with complex needs and their families. the hsc foundation (foundation) empowers all we serve to improve the quality of their lives…
Kosair for kids mission is to enhance the health and well-being of children by delivering financial support for healthcare, research, education, social services, and child advocacy.
To grant wishes to and otherwise act for the benefit of children suffering from terminal or life theatening illness or disease.
Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…
Laurence endeavors to develop the unique abilities and potential of each of its students in a diverse, inclusive and supportive learning community, where rich traditions and an innovative curriculum foster educational excellence and joy in…
Holt international is a christian organization committed to expressing god's compassion for children while always upholding the highest ethical standards. we: - find and support permanent, loving families for children who are orphaned,…
Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Operations Warrior Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Fine Arts Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HAWKEN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ETHAN LINDBERG FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds HESSEL SCHOOL HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CCAI ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds WACAP World Association for Children and Parents ↗
- Who funds No Greater Sacrifice Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds KIRTLAND AREA SERVICE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Les Cheneaux Yacht Club Foundation ↗
- Who funds IDEASTREAM ↗
- Who funds THE LITTLEST HEROES INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF LES CHENEAUX COMMUNITY LIBRARY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Deer Valley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.