Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dean Seeman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$986kHealth$295kAnimals$134kRecreation & Sports$82kEducation$80kYouth Development$28kFood & Nutrition$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $145k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$25,000
FRIENDS IN SERVICE HELPING$25,000
AUSTIN KIRBY FOUNDATION$25,000
REEL RECOVERY$20,000
DOUGLAS ANIMAL WELFARE$10,000
FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS$10,000
CANINE REHABILITATION CENTER$10,000
PROJECT PROM OF NORTHERN NEVADA$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SUICIDE PREVENTION NETWORK$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $964k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%AUSTIN KIRBY FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%AUSTIN KIRBY FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%AUSTIN KIRBY FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%AUSTIN KIRBY FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%AUSTIN KIRBY FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%THE AUSTIN KIRBY FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%AUSTIN KIRBY FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%THE AUSTIN KIRBY FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%AUSTIN KIRBY FOUNDATION: $13k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS: $211k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS COUNTY: $204k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS COUNTY: $201k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS: $90k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS: $20k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS: $20k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS: $15k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS: $10k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 15 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$1.7M
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+245%

Still filing today

40%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $781k · revenue +75% · 26% of their budget
  • RR
    REEL RECOVERY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $125k · revenue +24%
  • DA
    Douglas Animal Welfare Group
    9× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +266%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • DH
    DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
  • NA
    NEVADA AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 329graduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +245%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nevada Peer Support Network Inc
Health
2
Healthy Nevada
Health
3
The Nevada Bighorns Foundation
Education
4
Nevada Agricultural Foundation
Food & Nutrition
5
Crime Stoppers of Nevada Inc Fka Secret Witness of Las Vegas Inc

Crime Stoppers of Nevada, Inc. was created to involve the public in the fight against crime. Crime Stoppers of Nevada, Inc. provides citizens with a vehicle to anonymously supply Law Enforcement with information about a crime or wanted…

—
6
Firefighters of Southern Nevada Burn Foundation

Provide assistance and support to fire agencies, the community, burn victims, and families, related to catasrophic events. Provide assistance to at risk children identified by local fire agencies. Further education and awareness of fire…

Human Services
7
Northern Nevada Harm Reduction Alliance

Charitable

Health
8
Our Nevada Judges Inc
Education
9
Nevada Veterans Coalition

We support northern nevada veterans cemetery

—
10
Nevada Scottish Rite Foundation
Membership Benefit
11
Kids Chance of Nevada

Kids Chance of Nevada provides college and technical scholarships to the children of parents who have been killed or severely injured in a workplace accident in Nevada.

Education
12
Reno Toy Run

Reno Toy Run exists to gather and distribute toys at Christmas to Northern Nevada children, who might not otherwise receive any gifts for Christmas. Our membership gathers funds from the Community to cover expenses, and any extra funds are…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carson Valley Community Food Closet Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project Prom of Northern Nevada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC: $781,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INCAustin Kirby Foundation: $182,500 · Human ServicesAustin Kirby FoundationFRIENDS IN SERVICE HELPING: $157,500 · OtherFRIENDS IN SERVICE HELPINGIndividual grant recipient: $130,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCANINE REHABILITATION CENTER: $68,500 · OtherCANINE REHABILITATION CENTERASPIRE ACADEMY HIGH SCHOO: $52,000 · OtherASPIRE ACADEMY HIGH SCHOOIndividual grant recipient: $51,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDOUGLAS COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $32,000 · OtherDOUGLAS COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL+3 more: $43,000 · Other+3 moreREEL RECOVERY INC: $125,000 · HealthSuicide Prevention Network: $5,000 · HealthDouglas Animal Welfare Group: $65,000 · AnimalsPROJECT PROM OF NORTHERN NEVADA: $30,000 · PhilanthropyCarson Valley Community Food Closet Inc: $20,000 · Food & NutritionNEVADA AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 329: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCarson Valley Kiwanis Foundation: $3,000 · Community Improvement
Human Services$963,500Other$584,000Health$130,000Animals$65,000Philanthropy$30,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Youth Development$10,000Community Improvement$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC: $781,000 over 9y, 26% of budgetAustin Kirby Foundation: $182,500 over 9y, 57% of budgetREEL RECOVERY INC: $125,000 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetDouglas Animal Welfare Group: $65,000 over 9y, 5.1% of budgetPROJECT PROM OF NORTHERN NEVADA: $30,000 over 3y, 68% of budgetCarson Valley Community Food Closet Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNEVADA AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 329: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSuicide Prevention Network: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCarson Valley Kiwanis Foundation: $3,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Austin Kirby Foundation ↗
  • Who funds REEL RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds Douglas Animal Welfare Group ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT PROM OF NORTHERN NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds Carson Valley Community Food Closet Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 329 ↗
  • Who funds Suicide Prevention Network ↗
  • Who funds Carson Valley Kiwanis Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wray Family FoundationNV13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wray Family Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dean Seeman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dean Seeman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Dean Seeman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Dean Seeman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dean Seeman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph