Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The de Hechavarria Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$240
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$240
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Education$37kAnimals$11kHealth$10kReligion$8kInternational$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kFood & Nutrition$2kHuman Services$1k
02FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$240
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNBOUND$240
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UNBOUND: $960 → 16%UNBOUND: $960 → 16%UNBOUND: $960 → 16%UNBOUND: $240 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$71k · 18 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2021, 17 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$71k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+6%

Still filing today

56%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21
EducationHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DANA HALL SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $12k · revenue +26%
  • HS
    Humane Society of Marion County Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +214%
  • CU
    COLGATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • American Diabetes Association
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue -4%
  • TR
    THOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

3
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
8
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
9
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
10
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colgate University and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DANA HALL SCHOOL — $12,000 · EducationDANA HALL SCHOOLCOLGATE UNIVERSITY — $6,000 · EducationCOLGATE UNIVERSITYTHE BOLLES SCHOOL — $4,500 · EducationTHE BOLLES SCHOOLTENACRE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL CORPORATION — $1,000 · EducationBELMONT HILL SCHOOL INC — $1,000 · EducationRANDOLPH-MACON COLLEGE — $1,000 · EducationIMMACULATE CONCEPTION CATHOLIC CHURCH — $6,000 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION CATHOLIC CHURCHGRACE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $5,000 · OtherGRACE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLTRINITY COLLEGE — $5,000 · OtherTRINITY COLLEGEHappy Hearts Fund Inc — $2,500 · OtherHappy Hearts Fund IncOCALA FARM MINISTY — $2,000 · OtherOCALA FARM MINISTYHOLY FAMILY CHURCH — $2,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY CHURCHBENTLEY COLLEGE — $1,500 · OtherBENTLEY COLLEGEMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION — $1,000 · OtherHumane Society of Marion County Inc — $9,500 · AnimalsHumane Society o…THOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · AnimalsTHOROUGHBRED RET…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $6,750 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER…American Diabetes Association — $2,250 · HealthAmerican Diabet…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UN…Unbound — $3,120 · Human Services
Education$25,500Other$25,000Animals$10,500Health$10,000Human Services$3,120

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDANA HALL SCHOOL — $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Marion County Inc — $9,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $6,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOLLES SCHOOL — $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnbound — $3,120 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHappy Hearts Fund Inc — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $2,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTENACRE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL CORPORATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELMONT HILL SCHOOL INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRANDOLPH-MACON COLLEGE — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The de Hechavarria Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Humane Society of Marion County Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph