Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The de Atley Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$343k
Granted FY2021
21
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The de Atley Family Foundation Inc’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Madison Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year The de Atley Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 15 organizations, $343k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

15
20
15
21
0
22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202022.

Philanthropy$12MArts & Culture$515kHousing & Shelter$110kHuman Services$100kHealth$90kEducation$70kEnvironment$40kInternational$40kOther$0
02FY2021 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $235k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAYVIEW FOUNDATION$50,000
FRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN$50,000
MADISON MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ARTS$25,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF WISCONSIN$20,000
OVERTURE CENTER FOR THE ARTS$20,000
ACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS$20,000
DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES$20,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF MADISON$20,000
PROJECT HOPE$10,000
THE LITERACY NETWORK$10,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$10,000
YWCA$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY DANE COUNTY$10,000
GILDAS CLUB$10,000
THE ROAD HOME$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $20k → 10%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $20k → 10%THE ROAD HOME: $10k → 10%THE ROAD HOME: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$605k · 18 repeat orgs$405k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$605k
$325k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+29%

Still filing today

72%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalEducationHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +62%
  • LN
    LITERACY NETWORK INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $60k · revenue +108%
  • MM
    MADISON MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $50k · revenue +139%

Funded once

  • MC
    MADISON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2020 · $320k · revenue -3%
  • BY
    BRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Urban Triage Incorporated

Urban triage transforms culture, institutions, and communities to ensure a humane future.

Philanthropy
2
Madison Community Hospital

Madison regional health system serves as a community health focal point through the provision of compassionate, quality, and innovative care.

Health
3
Madison Community Cooperative

Madison community cooperative's mission is to improve the madison community by providing low-cost, not-for-profit cooperative housing for very low to moderate income people and to be inclusive of underrepresented and marginalized groups.

Education
4
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
5
Madison Art Gallery
6
Madison Development Corporation

Madison development corporation (mdc)'s mission is to help create jobs by providing gap financing to small businesses and to develop and finance quality, affordable workforce housing units in madison and the dane county area.

Community Improvement
7
Wayforward Resources Inc

Wayforward resources, inc. brings our community together to create food and housing security through action and advocacy.

Human Services
8
United Way of Dane County Inc

Unite the community to achieve measurable results that change lives.

9
Madison Area Care for the Homeless (Mach) Onehealth Inc

Madison street medicine is on a mission to develop programming and services to fill gaps in access to healthcare and housing in the madison area. we envision a community where individuals experiencing housing insecurity have equitable…

Health
10
United Way of Dane County Foundation Inc

The United Way of Dane County Foundation, Inc. exists to support the United Way of Dane County mission: to unite the community to achieve measurable results that change lives. By providing a base of support, the Foundation helps United Way…

11
Madison Professional Police Officers Association Inc

The madison professional police officers association represents law enforcement professionals who serve the city of madison, wisconsin, as either police officers, detectives, investigators, or sergeants.

12
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Madison Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Mount Horeb Area Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MADISON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $11,689,353 · PhilanthropyMADISON COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONMADISON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC — $320,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureMADISON MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC — $50,000 · Arts & CultureBAYVIEW FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · OtherOVERTURE CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $40,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF MADISON — $40,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF WISCONSIN — $40,000 · OtherYWCA — $20,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DANE COUNTY INC — $20,000 · OtherACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $20,000 · OtherGILDAS CLUB — $20,000 · OtherPORCHLIGHT INC — $20,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI — $20,000 · Other+4 more — $30,000 · OtherLITERACY NETWORK INC — $60,000 · EducationAgrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc — $60,000 · HealthDOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD HOME DANE COUNTY INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesSave The Children Federation Inc — $20,000 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · International
Philanthropy$11,689,353Arts & Culture$470,000Other$320,000Education$60,000Health$60,000Human Services$60,000International$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMADISON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $11,689,353 over 1y, 32% of budgetMADISON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC — $320,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLITERACY NETWORK INC — $60,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetAgrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc — $60,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMADISON MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC — $50,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBAYVIEW FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME DANE COUNTY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DANE COUNTY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPORCHLIGHT INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON READING PROJECT INC — $10,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT HOREB AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $5,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Evjue Foundation IncWI30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Evjue Foundation Inc · Madison Community Foundation · Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc · The Oscar Rennebohm Foundation Inc · Endres Manufacturing Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · United Way of Dane County Inc · The Roots and Wings Foundation Inc · Sub-Zero Group Foundation Inc · Veridian Foundation Inc · Trustage Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The de Atley Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph