Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Davis Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$200k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$710kHealth$320kEnvironment$160kCivil Rights$90kFood & Nutrition$40kCrime & Legal$20kCommunity Improvement$20k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$40,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT TRANSITIONS$40,000
CASA DE LAS MADRES$40,000
HOMELESS PRENATAL$40,000
YOUNG CENTER$40,000
FRESHWATER TRUST$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $160k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YOUNG CENTER: $40k → 14%YOUNG CENTER: $40k → 14%YOUNG CENTER: $40k → 14%YOUNG CENTER: $40k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 7 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +97% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$1.3M
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+7%

Still filing today

71%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Homeless Prenatal Program Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $300k · revenue +153%
  • RI
    Refugee & Immigrant Transitions
    7× · 2017–2024 · $250k · revenue +136%
  • THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $160k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • OREGON FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +7%
  • NP
    NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -23%
  • EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +85%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nijc Nfp

The National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC) is a leader in advancing immigrant rights through its unique strategy drawing on its legal services to promote legal reform through litigation, advocacy and strategic communications.

Crime & Legal
2
Equal Justice Center

The Equal Justice Center is a non-profit law firm and employment justice organization which empowers low-income families, workers, and communities to achieve fair treatment in the workplace, in the justice system, and in our shared society…

Civil Rights
3
Equitable Food Initiative

EFIs mission is to transform the produce industry and the lives of farmworkers by facilitating collaboration among workers, agricultural employers, retail buyers and consumer advocates.

Human Services
4
Northwest Immigrant Rights Project

Northwest immigrant rights project (nwirp) is a nonprofit organization committed to defending and advancing the rights of immigrants through immigration legal services to persons of low income, and also by providing community education and…

—
5
The International Refugee Rights Initiative

To enhance the protection of rights of the displaced worldwide by the provision of advice and assistance on the application of international law, the conducting of research on the interpretation and application of international law and the…

—
6
Migration Policy Institute

The nonpartisan migration policy institute seeks to improve immigration and integration policies through authoritative research and analysis, opportunities for learning and dialogue, and the development of new ideas to address complex…

Civil Rights
7
Refugee & Immigrant Center for Education & Legal Services

To deliver legal and social services to people and families who want to put down roots in the u.s. and cultivate welcoming communities that uphold our collective freedoms.

Civil Rights
8
Options Pregnancy Resource Centers Inc

Empowering life-affirming decisions

Health
9
International Budget Partnership

Ibp works with civil society, governments, international institutions and the private sector to bring about a world in which empowered citizens participate in open, inclusive public budgeting processes to shape policies and practices that…

International
10
National Immigration Forum

The forum advocates for the value of immigrants and immigration to the nation. from a diversity of perspectives, the forum uses communication, advocacy and policy to create a vision, concensus and strategy to lead to a better, more…

—
11
International Food Policy Research Institute

International food policy research institute's (ifpri) vision is a world free of hunger and malnutrition. ifpri's mission is to provide research-based policy solutions that sustainably reduce poverty and end hunger and malnutrition.

Food & Nutrition
12
Jubilee Immigration Advocates

Our mission is to reflect Gods intent for humanity, to live as a reconciled and and restored community. We stand in solidarity with immigrants by providing high quality, affordable immigration legal services and advocating for just…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Immigration Law Center; the most unlike its peers is Homeless Prenatal Program Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CASA DE LAS MADRES: $160,000 · OtherCASA DE LAS MADRESLAS CASA DE LAS MADRES: $140,000 · OtherLAS CASA DE LAS MADRESOREGON FOOD BANK: $40,000 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANK+2 more: $20,000 · Other+2 moreHomeless Prenatal Program Inc: $300,000 · HealthHomeless Prenatal Program …NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $20,000 · HealthNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIPRefugee & Immigrant Transitions: $250,000 · Youth DevelopmentRefugee & Immigrant …THE FRESHWATER TRUST: $160,000 · AnimalsTHE FRESHWATE…THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $160,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG CEN…NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $90,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL …EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $20,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUS…
Other$360,000Health$320,000Youth Development$250,000Animals$160,000Human Services$160,000Civil Rights$110,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc: $300,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetRefugee & Immigrant Transitions: $250,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetTHE FRESHWATER TRUST: $160,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $160,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $90,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Homeless Prenatal Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds Refugee & Immigrant Transitions ↗
  • Who funds THE FRESHWATER TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Davis Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Davis Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • The Freshwater Trust: 17% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Davis Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Davis Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Davis Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph