· Private foundation
The David P and Tracey L Gerber F Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of THE DAVID P AND TRACEY L GERBER F FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BARNERT TEMPLE | $10,150 |
| YORK STREET PROJECT LEGACY FUND | $3,000 |
| CHILDREN'S AID & FAMILY SERVICES | $2,725 |
| THE ARC OF BERGEN & PASSAIC COUNTIE | $2,300 |
| CHILD FOCUS | $1,500 |
| GUILFORD CENTRAL SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| DEPAUL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL | $500 |
| VOLUNTEER CENTER OF BERGEN COUNTY | $250 |
| NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL RESC | $250 |
| GARDEN STATE EQUALITY | $250 |
| WYCKOFF FAMILY YMCA | $110 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES INC5× · 2019–2024 · $56k · revenue +96%
- PFPLAY FOR PINK INC4× · 2019–2023 · $6k · revenue +25%
- TATHE ARC OF BERGEN AND PASSAIC COUNTIES INC2× · 2023–2024 · $5k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- TCTHE CTC ACADEMY INCone grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +14%
- CGCOVID19 GO FUND MEORG - DANIELLE WAone grant, 2020 · $5k
- SOSONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue -70%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.
The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
This entity is dedicated to providing hope and support for brain tumor patients and caregivers, while advancing public awareness of brain tumors, quality of care, and brain tumor research.
The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
The new york center for children provides trauma-focused therapy services to victims of child abuse, free of charge, for as long as their healing requires.
Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.
The school's mission is grounded in the belief expressed by b. lord buckley that opening the eyes and awakening the mind is the essence of education. guided by that mission for almost a century, buckley has purposely focused on developing…
Raspberry pi foundation north america enables young people to realize their full potential through the power of computer science and ai.
Provides transdisciplinary behavioral intervention and education to children and young adults, ages six to twenty-one, diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder and other developmental disabilities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Daughters of Miriam Center and the most unlike its peers is Home Sweet Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE CTC ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF BERGEN AND PASSAIC COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds SONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Young Men's Christian Association of the Oranges Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILD FOCUS INC ↗
- Who funds YORK STREET PROJECT LEGACY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BERGEN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds DAUGHTERS OF MIRIAM CENTER ↗
- Who funds PROGERIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Child Focus ↗
- Who funds CARMEL RAMS YOUTH SPORTS INC ↗
- Who funds GARDEN STATE EQUALITY EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Home Sweet Hope ↗
- Who funds SOCRATES SCULPTURE PARK INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-STATE BASSET HOUND RESCUE ↗
- Who funds WYCKOFF FAMILY YMCA ↗
- Who funds Nikki Mitchell Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds The National Foundation for Animal Rescue ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Columbia Bank Foundation · The Kaplen Foundation · Lillian P Schenck Tw Lps Fund · Henry & Marilyn Taub Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Pseg Foundation Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Rosen Family Foundation Inc · E and S Van Houten Memorial Fund · Russo Family Foundation Inc · Investors Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The David P and Tracey L Gerber F Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Child Focus Inc — 29% of income from government
- Volunteer Center of Bergen County Inc — 4% of income from government
- Bergen Performing Arts Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Metropolitan Young Men's Christian Association of the Oranges Inc — 2% of income from government
- Children's Aid and Family Services Inc — 1% of income from government
- Daughters of Miriam Center — 1% of income from government
- Wyckoff Family Ymca — 0% of income from government
- The Arc of Bergen and Passaic Counties Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.