Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Nevada · Private foundation

The David & Linda Shaheen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$701k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
16
Grants FY2025
10
Organizations funded FY2024
10%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$469,250
Organizations funded a year
9 to 11
FY2020 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
5
Total assets, FY2025
$13M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 10% of the organizations The David & Linda Shaheen Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving15$694k40%
FY202410$559k10%
FY202310$355k10%
FY202211$669k9%
FY202111$581k18%
FY20209$552kn/a
96% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Youth Development$2.5MEducation$367kArts & Culture$336kFood & Nutrition$26kHealth$11kHuman Services$2kEnvironment$2kPublic Benefit$2kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
A Place Called Home$2,272,68066%
Los Angeles Philharmonic Association$300,00060%
Heart of Los Angeles Youth Inc$170,00061%
FEAST Inc$25,50061%
The University of Georgia Foundation$9,50050%
Beth Morrison Projects Inc$5,00010%
Arlington Garden in Pasadena$1,50010%
Better Today Better Tomorrow$1,50011%
Fulcrum Arts$1,50010%
Simple Changes Inc$1,0001n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 10 recipients with no EIN on record ($621k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The David & Linda Shaheen Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetA Place Called Home: $2,272,680 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetLos Angeles Philharmonic Association: $300,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHeart of Los Angeles Youth Inc: $170,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetFEAST Inc: $25,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetThe University of Georgia Foundation: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBeth Morrison Projects Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetArlington Garden in Pasadena: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBetter Today Better Tomorrow: $1,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFulcrum Arts: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The David & Linda Shaheen Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The David & Linda Shaheen Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The David & Linda Shaheen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The David & Linda Shaheen Foundation

How much does The David & Linda Shaheen Foundation give?
The David & Linda Shaheen Foundation reported 16 grants totaling $701,435 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 11 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does The David & Linda Shaheen Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Youth Development (74%), Education (11%), Arts & Culture (10%).
Who are The David & Linda Shaheen Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: A Place Called Home ($2.3M), Los Angeles Philharmonic Association ($300k), Heart of Los Angeles Youth Inc ($170k).
Does The David & Linda Shaheen Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 10% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The David & Linda Shaheen Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as The David & Linda Shaheen Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is The David & Linda Shaheen Foundation based?
The David & Linda Shaheen Foundation is based in NV.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David & Linda Shaheen’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home