Skip to content

· Private foundation

The David and Debbi Elkouri Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$238kReligion$190kHuman Services$22kHealth$11kInternational$10kYouth Development$3kCommunity Improvement$3kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$580
Median grant
5
States reached
$98k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Treehouse$1,500
Christ the Savior Academy$1,050
The Order of St Ignatious$1,000
Hidden Hearts Foundation$1,000
University of Kansas Endowment$1,000
St George Cathedral$580
Individual grant recipient$300
Junior League of Wichita$125
Three Heirarchs Orthodox Church$100
Fundamental Learning$100
St Elijah Church$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KETCH: $1k → 16%KETCH: $1k → 16%KETCH: $500 → 16%KETCH: $200 → 16%THE TREEHOUSE: $4k → 16%The Treehouse: $2k → 16%THE TREEHOUSE: $500 → 16%RAINBOWS UNITED INC: $10k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $100 → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $500 → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OH
NJ
CA
CO
NE
MD
AZ
KS
TN
SC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$446k · 20 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
30

Total granted

$446k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+33%

Still filing today

55%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    CHRIST THE SAVIOR ACADEMY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $66k · revenue +47%
  • WC
    WICHITA CANCER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2021 · $11k · revenue +117%
  • TT
    THE TREEHOUSE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $6k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • INT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -17%
  • RU
    RAINBOWS UNITED INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
2
Wichita Eye Foundation

To engage in grant making to medical educational organizations and related charitable activities in the area of eye disease and vision disorder, and the care and treatment thereof.

Health
3
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
4
Wichita Center for Graduate Medical Education Inc

On behalf of the university of kansas school of medicine-wichita, wcgme administers the graduate medical education program for resident physicians in the city of wichita, kansas. wcgme's involvement in graduate medical education in wichita…

Education
5
Classical School of Wichita

Provide a classical and biblically-based education to young people in elementary and secondary grade levels.

Education
6
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
7
The Ku Endowment Charitable Gift Fund

To strengthen the University and communities that have touched the lives of KU alumni and friends, the mission of The KU Endowment Charitable Gift Fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable objectives of…

Philanthropy
8
Kansas City Christian School Association

To bring glory to god by providing children with an excellent christ- centered education rooted in the word of god.

—
9
Wichitas Littlest Heroes

Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…

Human Services
10
Washburn University Foundation

The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.

Education
11
Whitefield Academy Association

The mission of whitefield academy is to support parents by providing students with a top-tier academic foundation in a joyful, christ-centered community of classical learning.

Education
12
Wichita Regional Chamber of Commerce Inc

To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wichita State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Timothy P O'shaughnessy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST GEORGE CATHEDRAL: $165,965 · OtherST GEORGE CATHEDRALKANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT: $101,000 · OtherKANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENTWILLIAMS EDUCATIONAL FUND: $59,900 · OtherWILLIAMS EDUCATIONAL FUND+32 more: $46,738 · Other+32 moreCHRIST THE SAVIOR ACADEMY INC: $66,443 · EducationCHRIST THE SAVIOR A…WICHITA CANCER FOUNDATION: $11,000 · EducationWICHITA CANCER FOUN…+9 more: $6,356 · Education+9 moreRAINBOWS UNITED INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE TREEHOUSE INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesKANSAS ELKS TRAINING CENTER FOR THE HANDICAPPED INC: $3,100 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $1,100 · Human ServicesTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $1,000 · Human ServicesINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC: $10,000 · InternationalHIDDEN HEARTS FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC: $2,675 · Community ImprovementWICHITA FESTIVALS INC: $350 · Recreation & Sports
Other$373,603Education$83,799Human Services$20,700International$10,000Youth Development$3,000Community Improvement$2,675Recreation & Sports$350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHRIST THE SAVIOR ACADEMY INC: $66,443 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetWICHITA CANCER FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOWS UNITED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TREEHOUSE INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetKANSAS ELKS TRAINING CENTER FOR THE HANDICAPPED INC: $3,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHIDDEN HEARTS FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC: $2,675 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetWICHITA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $1,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE FOR EVERY STUDENT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP CATANESE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWICHITA FESTIVALS INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUI VICTIMS CENTER OF KANSAS INC: $300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTIMOTHY P O'SHAUGHNESSY FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF TULSA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $56 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTS UNITED FOR ANIMALS: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHRIST THE SAVIOR ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOWS UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TREEHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS ELKS TRAINING CENTER FOR THE HANDICAPPED INC ↗
  • Who funds HIDDEN HEARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE FOR EVERY STUDENT INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CAMP CATANESE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA FESTIVALS INC ↗
  • Who funds DUI VICTIMS CENTER OF KANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds TIMOTHY P O'SHAUGHNESSY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Laham Family FoundationKS26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Laham Family Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Wichita Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · Daniel J Taylor Family Charitable Foundation · Ima Foundation · Tim and Tracy Farrell Foundation · Lair Foundation · Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · United Way of the Plains Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The David and Debbi Elkouri Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The David and Debbi Elkouri Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The David and Debbi Elkouri Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The David and Debbi Elkouri Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David and Debbi Elkouri’s filings →

More from the funding graph