Skip to content

· Private foundation

The David and Caren Kessler Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2019
4
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Human Services$23kPhilanthropy$20kHealth$6kEducation$4kReligion$1kYouth Development$1kRecreation & Sports$555Other$0
02FY2019 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,565
Median grant
3
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$5,500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY$3,565
ACTIVE MINDS$500
GOLDEN SUPPER CAMP$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CARING HEARTS MINISTRY: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23k · 4 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +340% since the first grant, against -18% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$23k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+340%
-18%

Still filing today

50%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
HealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    3× · 2017–2019 · $19k
  • EJ
    EARNEST JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k
  • AM
    Active Minds Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $1k · revenue +340%

Funded once

  • MS
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -44%
  • HL
    HUNTINGDON LEARNING CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • CH
    CARING HEARTS MINISTRY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue -18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Family Services of Atlantic

Multiservice family counseling agency providing an array of social services and programs designed to meet the needs of individuals and families

—
2
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Foundation

To provide financial assistance to charitable health care initiatives.

Health
3
Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County

To strengthen jewish identity, energize the relationship with israel and meeting human needs that are uniquely the obligation of the jewish community.

Philanthropy
4
Jewish Board of Family & Children's

For 150 years, the jewish board of family and children's services, inc. ("the jewish board") has been helping new yorkers realize their potential and live as independently as possible. we promote resilience and recovery by addressing all…

Human Services
5
Jewish Federation of Cumberland Gloucester & Salem Counties

Advancement of the Jewish Community

Philanthropy
6
The Myositis Association

In 2023, The Myositis Association (TMA) celebrated our 30th year of service to the worldwide myositis community. TMA Myositis Africa was established as our newest regional support group, with support from the TMA Women of Color Affinity…

Human Services
7
Jewish Federation of Central New

To serve the interest and well being of jews in central new york and worldwide.

Philanthropy
8
Jewish Senior Life

To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.

Religion
9
The Jewish Community Center

The jewish community center of greater columbus (jcc) is a nonprofit human service agency offering a varied program that is jewish in nature. it is committed to enhancing the quality of individual and family life through the promotion of…

—
10
Jewish Community Center

The louis s. wolk jewish community center (jcc) aims to be a vibrant center of jewish living and values that is vital to the community at large for generations to come. it's mission has three primary tenants: 1) foster jewish identity, 2)…

Human Services
11
Jersey Strong Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Jewish Community Alliance

To coordinate, promote, and support the Jewish philanthropic, benevolent, educational, and communal activities in Southern Maine. To foster, develop, and encourage agencies as will best promote the welfare of this community.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Center; the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $19,210 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC: $5,030 · OtherMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INCHUNTINGDON LEARNING CENTER: $3,525 · OtherHUNTINGDON LEARNING CENTEREARNEST JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES: $2,000 · OtherEARNEST JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $1,500 · Other+2 more: $2,090 · Other+2 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY: $19,565 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSE…CARING HEARTS MINISTRY INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesActive Minds Inc: $1,000 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $160 · HealthGolden Slipper Camp: $555 · Recreation & Sports
Other$33,355Philanthropy$19,565Human Services$2,000Health$1,160Recreation & Sports$555

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY: $19,565 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC: $5,030 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARING HEARTS MINISTRY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetActive Minds Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF COLLIN COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGolden Slipper Camp: $555 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $160 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The David and Caren Kessler Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The David and Caren Kessler Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on David and Caren Kessler Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph