Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Dartnell Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$45kHuman Services$28kArts & Culture$9kYouth Development$2kHealth$1kReligion$1kHousing & Shelter$1k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$100k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOOKS IN EVERY BAK$5,000
ILLINOIS SAINT ANDREW SOCIETY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DRAYTON HALL PRESERVATION TRUST: $1k → 12%ILLINOIS SAINT ANDREW SOCIETY: $5k → 14%ILLINOIS SAINT ANDREW SOCIETY: $5k → 14%ILLINOIS SAINT ANDREW SOCIETY: $5k → 14%ILLINOIS SAINT ANDREW SOCIETY: $3k → 14%ILLINOIS SAINT ANDREW SOCIETY: $3k → 14%ILLINOIS SAINT ANDREW SOCIETY: $2k → 14%ILLINOIS SAINT ANDREW SOCIETY: $2k → 14%ILLINOIS SAINT ANDREW SOCIETY: $2k → 14%ILLINOIS SAINT ANDREW SOCIETY: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$77k · 8 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$77k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+49%

Still filing today

88%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    THE ILLINOIS SAINT ANDREW SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +38%
  • Lake Forest College
    8× · 2017–2024 · $27k · revenue +73%
  • DT
    DEFENDING THE EARLY YEARS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $7k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • AF
    ALI FORNEY CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +49%
  • WB
    WOMEN'S BD OF NORTHWESTERN MEM HOSP
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • DH
    DRAYTON HALL PRESERVATION TRUST
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue -2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Early Learning Indiana Inc

Early learning indiana (eli) is on a mission to ensure every child is empowered with essential skills to thrive in kindergarten and beyond. (see schedule o for continuation)

Human Services
2
Lycee Francais de Chicago Inc

The Lycee Francais de Chicago, driven by our core values of respect, responsibility and the joy of learning, empowers students to grow into active global citizens.

Education
3
Children's Museum of Illinois

The operation of a children's museum.

Arts & Culture
4
Chicago Historical Society

The Chicago History Museum strives to be a destination for learning, inspiration, and civic engagement. Through dynamic exhibitions, tours, programs, digital resources, and special events, the Museum connects people to Chicago's history…

Arts & Culture
5
Lawndale Educational and Regional Network Charter School

Provide students with the academic foundation and ambition to earn a college degree.

Education
6
Chicago Commons Association

Chicago Commons' mission is to empower individuals, families, and communities to overcome poverty, embrace opportunities, and thrive across generations. To fulfill that mission, we provide high quality early childhood education,…

Human Services
7
East Lake Academy

To provide catholic elementary education to students in the lake forest, illinois area.

Education
8
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
9
Illinois Association for the Education of Young Children

The membership organizations mission is to faciliate the optimal development of young children by advocating for the rights, needs and well-being of young children and educating, supporting, and collaborating.

Education
10
Northbrook Community Nursery School

Northbrook community nursery school, through the cooperation of staff, board and parents, is committed to meeting the social, emotional, intellectual and physical needs of each child. the preschool strives to facilitate this development…

11
Educare of West DuPage

To increase access to quality, comprehensive child care and early learning experiences for children from birth to five and their families and to increase school readiness in children from low income backgrounds.

Education
12
Lincoln Park Cooperative Nursery School

The mission of lincoln park cooperative nursery school is to provide a safe, nurturing, and developmentally appropriate program for preschool children, governed by a parent board and staffed by professional early childhood educators with…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Admiral At the Lake Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Books in Every Bag. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Lake Forest College — $26,500 · EducationLake Forest CollegeDEFENDING THE EARLY YEARS INC — $7,000 · EducationDEFENDING THE EARLY YEARS INCBooks in Every Bag — $5,000 · EducationBooks in Every BagBateman Boosters — $3,000 · EducationBateman BoostersTHE ILLINOIS SAINT ANDREW SOCIETY — $27,500 · Human ServicesTHE ILLINOIS SAINT ANDREW SOCIETYDRAYTON HALL PRESERVATION TRUST — $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE ALLIANCE FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD — $3,500 · OtherTHE ALLIA…WORLD FND FOR GIRL GUIDES GIRL SCOU — $2,000 · OtherWORLD FND…WOMEN'S BD OF NORTHWESTERN MEM HOSP — $1,000 · OtherWOMEN'S B…SIMPLY FROM THE HEART — $1,000 · OtherSIMPLY FR…Chicago Children's Museum — $6,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ADMIRAL AT THE LAKE FOUNDATION — $1,500 · Housing & ShelterALI FORNEY CENTER INC — $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Education$41,500Human Services$28,500Other$7,500Arts & Culture$6,000Housing & Shelter$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE ILLINOIS SAINT ANDREW SOCIETY — $27,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLake Forest College — $26,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Children's Museum — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBooks in Every Bag — $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetBateman Boosters — $3,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetTHE ADMIRAL AT THE LAKE FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDRAYTON HALL PRESERVATION TRUST — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Dartnell Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Dartnell Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Dartnell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph