· Private foundation
The Daniels Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $152k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BRIGHTS CREEK CONSERVANCY | $120,000 |
| CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYVANIA | $30,000 |
| MOORE COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN | $26,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS | $26,000 |
| GEISINGER HEALTH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION | $10,000 |
| NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA | $10,000 |
| THE BUCK HILL CONSERVATION FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| WOODFORD CEDAR RUN WILDLIFE | $5,000 |
| DESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN | $5,000 |
| TROUT UNLIMITED | $3,000 |
| THE BARRETT TOWNSHIP VOLUNTEER FIRE | $3,000 |
| WILD SALMON CENTER | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMOORE COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN6× · 2020–2025 · $233k · revenue +68%
- BCBRIGHT'S CREEK CONSERVANCY INC5× · 2021–2025 · $180k · revenue +174% · 32% of their budget
- TCTHE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC4× · 2021–2025 · $134k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- VMVETERANS MEMORIAL MUSEUMgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +37%
- CVCHEHALIS VETERANS MEMORIAL MUSEUMone grant, 2024 · $26k
- STSEA TURTLE INCone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.
Hawk mountain sanctuary association's mission is to conserve birds of prey worldwide by providing leadership in raptor conservation science and education, and by maintaining hawk mountain sanctuary as a model observation, research, and…
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…
The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…
Archbold expeditions, inc.'s mission is to build and share the scientific knowledge needed to protect the life, lands, and waters of the heart of florida and beyond.
Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.
Maintain the swan valley's unique natural resources and ensure that a vibrant human community can sustain itself through stewardship, education, economic viability, and conservation on public and private lands.
To change the future for nature and humanity by conserving birds of prey worldwide.
We are a grassroots organization focused on the critical environmental issues of sw florida. we accomplish this through a myriad of efforts by the teams in our programmatic departments: science, policy, education and wildlife…
The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Moore College of Art and Design. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MOORE COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN ↗
- Who funds BRIGHT'S CREEK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds The Buck Hill Conservation Foundation ↗
- Who funds VETERANS MEMORIAL MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds SEA TURTLE INC ↗
- Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds WILD SALMON CENTER ↗
- Who funds BARRETT TOWNSHIP VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GEISINGER HEALTH ↗
- Who funds DESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds WOODFORD CEDAR RUN WILDLIFE REFUGE ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds SOLEBURY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA-SONORA DESERT MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds AARP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Daniels Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wild Salmon Center — 49% of income from government
- The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.