· Public charity
The Cyber Sikh Organization a Non-Profit California Public Benefit
The cyber sikh organization has been organized for charitable, religious, and educational purposes.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEW YORK FILM ACADEMY | $11,736 |
| RADHA KRISHNA MANDIR | $10,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
US giving: 81% of grant dollars ($287k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 20% that went abroad ($69k) is mapped below.
Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Beyond the US: 20% of all-years giving ($69k)
2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
Grants abroad, by region: $26k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Education
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.
4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CUCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY3× · 2017–2019 · $106k · revenue +62%
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH2× · 2021–2022 · $38k
- RKRADHA KRISHNA MANDIR2× · 2023–2024 · $37k
Funded once
- WCWADHAM COLLEGEone grant, 2022 · $32k
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $22k · revenue +6%
University of Chicagoone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +22%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organizations purpose is for the public benefit the advancement of the Sikh religion, primarily but not exclusively, in particular the ancient practice of meditation.
Religious and sikh cultural community services
NAD Music Institute is engaged in research, preservation, and education of music through research and collaboration with expert individuals and organizations across the world.
The principal objects of the University are the advancement of learning by teaching and research, and its dissemination by every means. We work as one Oxford bringing together our staff, students and alumni, our colleges, faculties,…
Improve excellence and access in higher education. Current focus is on India. Thus, Nalanda 2.0's current focus is to make India's higher education system world-class by building a world-class multidisciplinary research university,…
To support needy people of any religion worldwide
To build a sikh temple that cares about the community, bring spiritualism, peace around inland empire area and around the world. we intend to revive the true teachings of guru nanak dev ji, guru granth sahib ji and all guru sahaibans,…
Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…
The organization is formed for religious purposes. the organization is operating as a temple and serves as a place of worship for devotees of sikh community. it is also a place for the study of sikh religion.
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Cyber Sikh Organization a Non-Profit California Public Benefit funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cyber Sikh Organization a Non-Profit California Public Benefit. Bigger dots raise more.
- Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Cyber Sikh Organization a Non-Profit California Public Benefit?
Find your warmest path to The Cyber Sikh Organization a Non-Profit California Public Benefit through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Cyber Sikh Organization a Non-Profit California Public Benefit’s filings →