Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Cutwater Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$250kHuman Services$100kEmployment$40kRecreation & Sports$28kInternational$25kHousing & Shelter$8kCommunity Improvement$5kPhilanthropy$5k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$399k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLOOD WATER$50,000
THE HUNDRED MOVEMENT$10,000
EMBRACE OF CELEBRATION$10,000
THE HONOR FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EMBRACE OF CELEBRATION: $10k → 13%ADAPTIVE SPORTS CONNECTION: $8k → 5%RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%EMBRACE OF CELEBRATION: $10k → 13%EMBRACE OF CELEBRATION: $10k → 13%EMBRACE OF CELEBRATION: $8k → 13%EMBRACE OF CELEBRATION: $8k → 13%BEYOND PREGNANCY CARE: $5k → 13%BEYOND PREGNANCY CARE: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
IN
OH
CA
AZ
TN
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$408k · 7 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +115% since the first grant, against +63% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$408k
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+115%
+63%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentInternationalRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    The Hundred Movement Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +422%
  • EO
    EMBRACE OF CELEBRATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $45k · revenue +779%
  • FF
    FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $25k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • MF
    MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +81%
  • HP
    HOPE PARTNERSHIP INC D/B/A COMMUNITY HOPE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +7%
  • AS
    ADAPTIVE SPORTS CONNECTION CORDERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue ×11

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Employment Network of Sw Florida

To transform the lives of individuals with disabilities throught insightful guidance and support needed to obtain and maintain meaningful employment.

Employment
2
Fulfillment House Inc
Health
3
Promising People Missions Inc

Promising People Missions is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization committed to aiding transitioning citizens in overcoming re-entry obstacles by facilitating access to support services, connecting them with faith-based organizations,…

Crime & Legal
4
The Stride Center

As an innovative social enterprise, The Stride Center's mission is to empower men and women facing barriers to employment to achieve economic self-sufficiency. We provide a comprehensive career development program that includes job skills…

5
Refugee Hope Partners Inc

To engage, equip, and encourage our refugee neighbors so that all may thrive.

Human Services
6
Thrive International

Our Mission is to Empower Multicultural Communities to THRIVE.

Human Services
7
Taskforce Fore Ending Homelessness Inc

To get our neighbors experiencing homelessness off the street through proactive outreach and services and provide placement in a program that will help them get "home."

Human Services
8
Helping Other People Exceed

The Mission of HOPE is To Provide Individuals and Families Detoured in Life Due ro Incarceration, Substance Use Disorder, Houselessness, and Discrimination Specialized, Wraparound Navigation Routes to Housing, Employment, Ecucation, and…

Housing & Shelter
9
Hopes Path

Hope's Path is an internship program offering housing and life skill development to former foster youth while assisting them with their goals to successfully launch into sustainable independent lives knowing their value and identity in…

Human Services
10
Doors of Hope Transition Ministries

To guide homeless families and at-risk families toward self-reliance and stability through a holistic, individualized approach that includes life- skills training, mentoring and supporitive housing

Human Services
11
Revive Inc

Empowering individuals on their journey to lasting recovery. our team of dedicated professionals offer a dynamic blend of therapeutic support and personal empowerment. we dont just offer recovery; we provide a roadmap to your vibrant…

Health
12
New Covenant Safe Haven

New Covenant Safe Haven is a Christian-based organization committed to uplifting and supporting individuals and families living in poverty within our community. Our primary mission is to provide essential services such as temporary shelter…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Hungry Inc and the most unlike its peers is Adaptive Sports Connection Corder. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BLOOD WATER — $240,000 · OtherBLOOD WATER+2 more — $7,500 · OtherThe Hundred Movement Inc — $47,500 · Human ServicesThe Hundred Movement IncEMBRACE OF CELEBRATION INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesEMBRACE OF CELEBRATION INCBEYOND PREGNANCY CARE INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesBEYOND PREGNANCY CARE INCADAPTIVE SPORTS CONNECTION CORDER — $7,500 · Human ServicesADAPTIVE SPORTS CONNECTION C…RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Human ServicesFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC — $25,000 · InternationalMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyGATES PHILANTHROPY PARTNERS — $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE HONOR FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · EmploymentNINE 13 INC — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsHOPE PARTNERSHIP INC D/B/A COMMUNITY HOPE CENTER INC — $7,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$247,500Human Services$115,000International$25,000Philanthropy$25,000Employment$20,000Recreation & Sports$20,000Housing & Shelter$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Hundred Movement Inc — $47,500 over 6y, 20% of budgetEMBRACE OF CELEBRATION INC — $45,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC — $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HONOR FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNINE 13 INC — $20,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBEYOND PREGNANCY CARE INC — $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetHOPE PARTNERSHIP INC D/B/A COMMUNITY HOPE CENTER INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS CONNECTION CORDER — $7,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCELEBRATION FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRIVERSIDE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGATES PHILANTHROPY PARTNERS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENTORING ALLIANCE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA9.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Cutwater Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Cutwater Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Cutwater Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph