Skip to content
The Curtis Foundation (Fka Annex Youth Center of Greenwich) at a glance

· Private foundation

The Curtis Foundation (Fka Annex Youth Center of Greenwich)

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Religion$53kHousing & Shelter$50kFood & Nutrition$11kYouth Development$8kInternational$5kHealth$4k
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,640
Median grant
3
States reached
$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TYNDALE THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$10,000
CITY FEST CO THE LUIS PALAU ASSOCIATION$2,640
CENTER FOR HOPE & RENEWAL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
2
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
3
World Link Ministries Inc

World link ministries exists to serve as an "evangelistic force" by equipping and mobilizing teams of local evangelists and church planters who are effective in establishing, sustaining, and reproducing the body of christ in those parts of…

Religion
4
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
5
International Leadership Advancement Ministries Inc

To take the Gospel of Christ, evangelize and disciple the people in Latin America, Spain and Portugal. This will be done through the use of digital and social media (DVD, CD-Rom, CD, etc) radio, television, live and online seminars and…

Religion
6
Global Faith Network
Human Services
7
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
8
Nexus Mission

Assist missionaries form asian churches to integrate effectively into the target culture together with teir field partners and help them to undertake god-honoring initiatives which help the neediest people

Religion
9
Visionsynergy

Our mission is to accelerate the great commission by equipping leaders, developing networks, and catalyzing collaboration toward spiritual breakthroughs among the least reached peoples and places of the world.

International
10
Lx Ministries Inc

Our mission is to multiply the global impact and influence of Christian leaders and pastors throughout their organizations and communities. Our activities involve working with members of the leadership of other exclusively charitable…

Religion
11
Finisterre Vision

It is our vision to see local churches work together to establish god-glorifying churches that are self-governing, self-supporting, and self-propagating in every people group in the finisterre mountains in papua-new guinea.

Religion
12
Disciple Makers Network

To connect indigenous ministers with resources in fulfilling the Great Commission.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bridgeport Rescue Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Luis Palau Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INCCHICAGO HOPE CHURCH: $32,500 · OtherCHICAGO HOPE CHURCHGLOBAL LEAD MINISTRY: $5,000 · OtherGLOBAL LEAD MINISTRYIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+2 more: $2,000 · OtherTYNDALE THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY INC FKA TYNDALE INTERNATIONAL MISSION: $10,000 · EducationTYNDALE THEOL…GLOBALLEAD: $5,000 · EducationGLOBALLEADNEXUS INTERNATIONAL: $8,000 · ReligionNEXUS INT…Luis Palau Association: $2,640 · ReligionLuis Pala…THE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionGREENWICH CHAPLAINCY SERVICES INC: $2,500 · Health
Human Services$50,000Other$42,000Education$15,000Religion$10,640Food & Nutrition$10,000Health$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTYNDALE THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY INC FKA TYNDALE INTERNATIONAL MISSION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEXUS INTERNATIONAL: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLuis Palau Association: $2,640 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH CHAPLAINCY SERVICES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Curtis Foundation (Fka Annex Youth Center of Greenwich) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Curtis Foundation (Fka Annex Youth Center of Greenwich). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Curtis Foundation (Fka Annex Youth Center of Greenwich)’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home