Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Crow Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$208k
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$505kHealth$290kEducation$174kReligion$165kPhilanthropy$130kAnimals$97kArts & Culture$81kHousing & Shelter$77kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k35 grants · $123k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $85k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTENARY COLLEGE - GSC ENDOWED$20,000
PENINSULA HOME FUND$20,000
FIRST STEP FAMILY SUPPORT$15,000
UNITED WAY OF CLALLAM COUNTY$10,000
COMMON GROUND COMMUNITY INC$10,000
SHREVEPORT SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION$10,000
ROBINSON'S RESCUE$5,000
CARITAS OF AUSTIN$5,000
GINGERBREAD HOUSE$5,000
CHRISTUS FOUNDATION - SHREVEPORTBOSSIER$5,000
UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARLESTON$5,000
FAITH AND FOSTERING$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$5,000
MOBILE LOAVES AND FISHES$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $156k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN: $5k → 11%EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN: $5k → 11%EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 13%CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN: $5k → 11%EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 13%CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN: $5k → 11%EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN MINISTRIES INC: $4k → 13%CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN: $5k → 11%EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN MINISTRIES INC: $4k → 13%CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN: $5k → 11%EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN MINISTRIES INC: $2k → 13%CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN: $5k → 11%EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN MINISTRIES INC: $2k → 13%EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN MINISTRIES INC: $2k → 13%EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN MINISTRIES INC: $500 → 13%CLALLAM MOSAIC: $2k → 12%CLALLAM COUNTY YMCA: $4k → 12%CLALLAM MOSAIC: $2k → 12%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $6k → 22%CLALLAM COUNTY YMCA: $4k → 12%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $5k → 22%CLALLAM MOSAIC: $1k → 12%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $4k → 22%CLALLAM COUNTY YMCA: $4k → 12%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $4k → 22%CLALLAM MOSAIC: $1k → 12%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $4k → 22%CLALLAM COUNTY YMCA: $4k → 12%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $3k → 22%CLALLAM MOSAIC: $1k → 12%CLALLAM COUNTY YMCA: $4k → 12%CLALLAM MOSAIC: $1k → 12%CLALLAM COUNTY YMCA: $4k → 12%CLALLAM MOSAIC: $1k → 12%CLALLAM COUNTY YMCA: $4k → 12%CLALLAM MOSAIC: $1k → 12%CLALLAM COUNTY YMCA: $4k → 12%CLALLAM MOSAIC: $1k → 12%CLALLAM COUNTY YMCA: $4k → 12%HOPE CONNECTION INC: $5k → 22%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $4k → 22%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $4k → 22%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $4k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
VA
AR
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 58 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

58 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

58
8

Total granted

$1.7M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+28%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureAnimalsReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    Shreveport Scottish Rite Foundation Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +358% · 41% of their budget
  • CC
    CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING
    9× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +69%
  • OP
    OLYMPIC PENINSULA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +6%
  • HC
    HOPE CONNECTIONS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +14%
  • MD
    M D ANDERSON CANCER CLINIC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Desoto Hospital Association Inc Dba Desoto Regional Health System

34 bed hospital located in a medically underserved parish in northwest louisiana. includes three rural health clinics,24 hour emergency services, industrial medicine clinic, and wellness/therapy center.

Health
2
Greater Baton Rouge Food Bank

Our mission is to feed the hungry in baton rouge and the surrounding parishes by providing food and educational outreach through faith-based and other community partners.

—
3
Community Clinic of Southwest Missouri

The mission of the community clinic of southwest missouri is to improve the health of people in our community without access to medical, dental, or mental health care.

—
4
Baptist Community Health Services Inc

Motivated by the love and compassion of christ and in keeping with our baptist heritage, bchs provides quality primary healthcare and behavioral healthcare to individuals in medically underserved communities.

Health
5
United Way of Southwest Louisiana Inc

To unite our community by funding programs in the areas of education, income and health. Our goal is to create long-lasting change that prevents problems from happening in the first place. Our community is the 5 parish area of Allen,…

—
6
Louisiana Baptist Childrens Home and Family Ministries

To provide love, care, and a positive christian witness for children and families in need.

—
7
Southern Indiana Community Health Care

To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…

Health
8
The Food Bank of Central Louisiana

To alleviate hunger in central louisiana

—
9
Louisiana Alliance for Nonprofits

To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.

Philanthropy
10
Acadiana Outreach Center Inc

Acadiana outreach center, inc. provides shelter and support to help the poor and homeless rebuild their lives.

Religion
11
NeighborHealth Center Inc

Serving christ by loving our neighbors through the practice of excellent, compassionate, and accessible healthcare.

Health
12
Southwest Louisiana Area Health Education Center Foundation

To improve health status through access to information, education, & health services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Connections Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
28/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PENINSULA HOME FUND: $155,000 · OtherPENINSULA HOME FUNDFIRST STEP FAMILY SUPPORT: $135,000 · OtherFIRST STEP FAMILY SUPPORTCENTENARY COLLEGE - GSC ENDOWED: $95,000 · OtherCENTENARY COLLEGE - GSC ENDOWEDUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA: $70,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANABELCHER-DIXIE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $49,000 · OtherCOUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM & DRUG ABUSE: $45,000 · OtherLSU HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION: $44,000 · Other+40 more: $518,500 · Other+40 moreCADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $38,000 · Human ServicesCADDO COUN…OLYMPIC PENINSULA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN: $36,000 · Human ServicesOLYMPIC PE…CONCERNED CITIZENS: $35,000 · Human ServicesCONCERNED …EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN MINISTRIES INC: $29,500 · Human ServicesEVERGREEN …CLALLAM MOSAIC: $11,000 · Human ServicesCLALLAM MO…+2 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesShreveport Scottish Rite Foundation Inc: $75,000 · Arts & CultureShreveport…SHREVEPORT OPERA: $38,000 · Arts & CultureSHREVEPORT…SHREVEPORT SYMPHONY INC: $38,000 · Arts & CultureSHREVEPORT…+1 more: $4,000 · Arts & CulturePENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthGINGERBREAD HOUSE BOSSIERCADDO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $27,000 · HealthNORTH CADDO MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATI: $24,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC: $15,000 · Health+2 more: $4,000 · HealthOLYMPIC PENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETY: $40,000 · AnimalsROBINSONS RESCUE INC: $33,000 · AnimalsCHIMP HAVEN INC: $24,000 · AnimalsUnited Way of Clallam County: $60,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK: $31,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,111,500Human Services$155,500Arts & Culture$155,000Health$100,000Animals$97,000Philanthropy$60,000Food & Nutrition$36,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetShreveport Scottish Rite Foundation Inc: $75,000 over 9y, 41% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA: $70,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetUnited Way of Clallam County: $60,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetOLYMPIC PENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETY: $40,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSHREVEPORT OPERA: $38,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetCADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $38,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSHREVEPORT SYMPHONY INC: $38,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetOLYMPIC PENINSULA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN: $36,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCONCERNED CITIZENS: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetROBINSONS RESCUE INC: $33,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetChristus Foundation Shreveport-Bossier: $33,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE: $32,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMON GROUND COMMUNITY INC: $32,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetNORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK: $31,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN MINISTRIES INC: $29,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGINGERBREAD HOUSE BOSSIERCADDO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $27,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC: $24,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CADDO MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATI: $24,000 over 9y, 7.0% of budgetTom Harrison Ministries Inc: $21,500 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetSamaritan Counseling Center: $18,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetShreveport Bossier Rescue Mission: $15,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA CENTER: $15,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLYON COLLEGE: $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCLALLAM MOSAIC: $11,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHREVEPORT GREEN: $10,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSTEAMED RICE INC FKA SCI-PORT LOUISIANA'S SCIENCE CENTER: $8,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetSOUTHFIELD SCHOOL INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNORWELA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 215: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE CONNECTIONS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRed River Film Society Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKINGDOM LIFE ACADEMY: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Shreveport Scottish Rite Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Clallam County ↗
  • Who funds OLYMPIC PENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SHREVEPORT OPERA ↗
  • Who funds CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds SHREVEPORT SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds OLYMPIC PENINSULA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN ↗
  • Who funds CONCERNED CITIZENS ↗
  • Who funds ROBINSONS RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Christus Foundation Shreveport-Bossier ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds COMMON GROUND COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GINGERBREAD HOUSE BOSSIERCADDO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHIMP HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CADDO MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATI ↗
  • Who funds Tom Harrison Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Samaritan Counseling Center ↗
  • Who funds Shreveport Bossier Rescue Mission ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILADELPHIA CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LYON COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North LouisianaLA50.7× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Louisiana · Grayson Foundation Inc · Carolyn W & Charles T Beaird Family Foundation · The Powers Foundation Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · J B Atkins Foundation · Anita Mary Tippings Steinau Foundat · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · Poindexter Foundation Inc · Zadeck Family Foundation · United Way of Northwest Louisiana · Willis-Knighton Medical Center

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Crow Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Crow Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Crow Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Crow Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Crow’s filings →

More from the funding graph