· Private foundation
Anita Mary Tippings Steinau Foundat
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k26 grants · $71k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $168k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOOD BANK OF NWLA | $20,000 |
| CHRISTIAN SERVICE | $20,000 |
| CADDO PARISH SHERIFF'S OFFICE | $15,000 |
| COMMON GROUND | $12,105 |
| MARY'S HOUSE | $11,000 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA | $10,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA | $10,000 |
| TOM HARRISON PASTORAL MINISTRIES | $10,000 |
| SHREVEPORT GREEN | $10,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $10,000 |
| SHREVEPORT-BOSSIER RESCUE MISSION | $10,000 |
| YOUNG LIFE | $10,000 |
| FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| YMCA | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
32 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CGCOMMON GROUND RELIEF INC5× · 2018–2022 · $92k · revenue +74% · 31% of their budget
- YLYOUNG LIFE6× · 2017–2022 · $60k · revenue +59%
- NLNORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK3× · 2017–2019 · $50k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- RPRENESTING PROJECT INCone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -17%
- FOFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +87%
- MHMARYS HOUSEOF LOUISIANA INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +278%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Non-denominational christian mission whose purpose is to assist those in need of shelter, food and clothing in the henderson county, north carolina area.
Providing free pharmaceuticals to the indigent.
Rebuilding together new orleans helps low to moderate income greater new orleans area homeowners repair and rehabilitate their homes. rtno stabilizes and revitalizes neighborhoods and improves health and safety in our communities.
Our mission is to feed the hungry in baton rouge and the surrounding parishes by providing food and educational outreach through faith-based and other community partners.
Enhance the dignity and quality of life for individuals, families, and communities by eliminating barriers to opportunity and helping people in need reach their fullest potential through employment and workforce development…
Prevent homelessness. promote self-sufficiency and dignity.
See schedule o - mission statement for part i line 1 covers this item
To provide love, care, and a positive christian witness for children and families in need.
Glorify and serve god by providing meals for hungry men, women, and children, emergency shelter and transition to independence for homeless men, and spiritual hope through jesus christ.
Acadiana outreach center, inc. provides shelter and support to help the poor and homeless rebuild their lives.
The christian outreach center of baton rouge is a christ-centered homeless prevention ministry helping people toward self-sufficiency in downtown baton rouge.
The Mission LA is seeking the renewal of Los Angeles by guiding the marginalized from suffering to flourishing and equipping others to do the same in their own neighborhoods. We the mission LA by providing meals, recovery, and holistic…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Northwest Louisiana and the most unlike its peers is Marys Houseof Louisiana Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMON GROUND RELIEF INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Shreveport Bossier Rescue Mission ↗
- Who funds Tom Harrison Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds Air Warrior Courage Foundation ↗
- Who funds SHREVEPORT GREEN ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Woodys Home for Veterans ↗
- Who funds GINGERBREAD HOUSE BOSSIERCADDO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RENESTING PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds GIFT OF LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds PAWS 4 LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOFFMAN PRISON MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds MARYS HOUSEOF LOUISIANA INC ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds GEAUX 4 KIDS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Louisiana · The Crow Foundation · Grayson Foundation Inc · The Powers Foundation Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · H E Storer Charitable Foundation · Carolyn W & Charles T Beaird Family Foundation · Wheless Foundation · The Biedenharn Foundation · Zadeck Family Foundation · Willis-Knighton Medical Center · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Anita Mary Tippings Steinau Foundat funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Anita Mary Tippings Steinau Foundat?
Find your warmest path to Anita Mary Tippings Steinau Foundat through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.