Skip to content
The Crebilly Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Crebilly Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Philanthropy$81kReligion$66kFood & Nutrition$19kEducation$17kHuman Services$14kEmployment$10kHealth$10kHousing & Shelter$9kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$79,992
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Fidelity Charitable Donor Advised Fund$79,992
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%MESILLA VALLEY HOSPICE: $4k → 23%Mesilla Valley Hospice: $1k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$110k · 10 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against -14% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2022, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$110k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
-14%

Still filing today

60%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
Human ServicesHealthEmploymentEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LA CASA INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +115%
  • EC
    EL CALDITO SOUP KITCHEN
    2× · 2020–2021 · $9k · revenue +78%
  • MV
    MESILLA VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $7k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • SS
    SUMMER SEARCH
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -14%
  • EA
    Episcopal Academygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +41%
  • NF
    NM FARM & LIVESTOCK BUREAU
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico

The Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico serves as a community resource, connects donors to needs, and supports charitable organizations in their work.

Philanthropy
2
Bosque School

To create transformative learning experiences that empower a diverse community of students to lead lives of intellectual curiosity, personal integrity, and compassionate contribution to a more just world.

Education
3
Valley Christian Schools

The mission of valley christian schools is to equip students to be culture changers for christ by delivering academic excellence, facilitating spiritual growth, and building lifelong community.

Education
4
Child Crisis Center of El Paso Inc

The mission of the Child Crisis Center is to protect children, newborn through fifteen years of age, from abuse/neglect by providing temporary short-term emergency shelter and family support services.

Human Services
5
Mesilla Valley Community of Hope

Mesilla valley community of hope is a daytime service center for homeless people. it provides programs and intensive case management. it operates several housing programs to meet the people's emergency, transitional and permanent housing…

Human Services
6
Casa Partners 4NMKIDS Inc

The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…

Civil Rights
7
El Paso Human Services Inc

El paso human services, inc. (ephsi), a private non-profit multi-purpose organization, has been providing social services in el paso county since 1984. ephsi has extensive experience in developing, implementing and executing federal, state…

Human Services
8
Mesilla Valley Hospice Foundation Inc

The foundation supports the operations and programs of mesilla valley hospice, inc. the foundation solicits, invests, and administers gifts received in support of mesilla valley hospice, inc.

Human Services
9
Concho Valley Biblical Counseling Center

To assist people through life's struggles by spiritually guiding individuals by encouraging, offering biblical counseling and educating individuals with tools and skills to cope with life's difficult situations. it is the desire of the…

Health
10
Carbon Valley Academy

To provide rich content and solid skills instruction in an environment that champions character and personal academic achievement. carbon valley provides a public eduction to students preschool through grade 8.

Education
11
Coyote Hill Foster Care Ministries

Coyote Hill provides shelter, counseling, educational assistance, and healthcare services to sexually, physically, emotionally abused, and/or neglected children.

Human Services
12
Rehoboth Christian School Assoc

To provide Christian educational instruction to children in grades Pre-K through 12 within a multi-cultural setting. RCS seeks to be vigorously academic, beautifully diverse and thoroughly Christian.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesilla Valley Hospice Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cowboys for Cancer Research Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Fidelity Charitable Donor Advised Fund: $79,992 · OtherFidelity Charitable Donor Advised FundST DAVIDS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $46,000 · OtherST DAVIDS EPISCOPAL CHURCHFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF LAS CRUCES: $10,200 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF LAS CRUCESNM FARM & LIVESTOCK BUREAU: $10,000 · OtherLA CASA INC: $10,000 · OtherEL CALDITO SOUP KITCHEN: $8,500 · OtherMESILLA VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $7,000 · Other+5 more: $17,000 · Other+5 moreSUMMER SEARCH: $10,000 · EmploymentEpiscopal Academy: $10,000 · EducationMESILLA VALLEY HOSPICE INC: $5,200 · Human ServicesCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $4,000 · Human ServicesLAS CRUCES GOSPEL RESCUE MISSION: $9,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE BARN AT SPRING BROOK FARM INC: $1,000 · HealthCOWBOYS FOR CANCER RESEARCH INC: $500 · HealthCOMMUNITY COALITION: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$188,692Employment$10,000Education$10,000Human Services$9,200Housing & Shelter$9,000Health$1,500Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUMMER SEARCH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEpiscopal Academy: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA CASA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLAS CRUCES GOSPEL RESCUE MISSION: $9,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetEL CALDITO SOUP KITCHEN: $8,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetMESILLA VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMESILLA VALLEY HOSPICE INC: $5,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARN AT SPRING BROOK FARM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY COALITION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Binns Family Foundati…Community Foundation …Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Binns Family FoundationNM13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Binns Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Crebilly Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Crebilly Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Crebilly Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Crebilly Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Crebilly’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home