Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cove Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$270k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Animals$296kEducation$204kRecreation & Sports$166kEnvironment$160kHousing & Shelter$149kFood & Nutrition$146kHuman Services$128kYouth Development$90kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $240k
$13,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIDGE CLUB OF GREATER LOWELL$41,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MONMOUTH COUNTY$25,000
YMCA$23,000
HUNGER FREE AMERICA$20,000
FOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC$15,000
SIPPICAN LANDS TRUST INC$15,000
BROOKLINE FOOD PANTRY$15,000
ST JOHN'S BREAD & LIFE$15,000
MT DESERT ISLAND BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY$14,000
ISLAND HOUSING TRUST$13,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$12,000
MT ANTHONY UNION HS$12,000
CHARLES RIVER WATERSHED FOUNDATION$10,000
BUZZARDS BAY COALITION INC$10,000
SWIM STRONG FOUNDATION INC$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NARAL PRO CHOICE MISSOURI FOUNDATION: $10k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CO
MO
VA
NM
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 27 repeat orgs$484k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
30

Total granted

$1.2M
$434k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+13%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationFood & NutritionAnimalsEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    AYLA'S ACRES NO-KILL ANIMAL RESCUE INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $145k · revenue +51%
  • BUZZARDS BAY COALITION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $75k · revenue +99%
  • MW
    MILLSTONE WILDLIFE CENTER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $74k · revenue +55% · 47% of their budget

Funded once

  • HH
    HAVERHILL HOMELESS VETERANS
    one grant, 2019 · $59k
  • NH
    NEW HAMPSHIRE TURTLE RESCUE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $43k
  • HV
    HOMELESS VETERANS
    one grant, 2020 · $34k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
2
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
3
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
4
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
5
Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance Inc

Maha breaks down barriers facing first-time and first-generation home buyers and owners through education, counseling, advocacy, and grassroots organizing.

Housing & Shelter
6
Maine Appalachian Trail Land Trust

To preserve and protect land surrounding the appalachian trail in maine for public benefit.

Environment
7
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
8
Food Bank of Central New York

Food bank of central new york is a not-for-profit organization: our mission is to lead the effort to eliminate hunger in our region, through partnerships with others in our community, through education, advocacy, and distribution of…

Food & Nutrition
9
Natural Areas Conservancy Inc

The natural areas conservancy champions urban natural areas in new york city and across the nation through innovative research, partnerships, and advocacy. we increase the health and resilience of urban forests and wetlands, catalyze…

Environment
10
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
11
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
12
Northeast Organic Farming Association of New Hampshire

NOFA-NH actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. NOFA-NH helps people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Side Center for Community Life; the most unlike its peers is Rails to Trails Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
21/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRIDGE CLUB OF GREATER LOWELL: $122,000 · OtherBRIDGE CLUB OF GREATER LOWELLYMCA: $69,000 · OtherYMCABOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $60,000 · OtherBOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITYHAVERHILL HOMELESS VETERANS: $58,500 · OtherHAVERHILL HOMELESS VETERANSST GABRIELS CHURCH: $45,000 · OtherMT ANTHONY UNION HS: $44,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherHUNGER FREE AMERICA INC: $37,000 · OtherWESTMINSTER SCHOOL: $35,000 · OtherHOMELESS VETERANS: $33,750 · Other+31 more: $400,583 · Other+31 moreAYLA'S ACRES NO-KILL ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $145,000 · AnimalsAYLA'S ACRES NO-K…MILLSTONE WILDLIFE CENTER: $73,666 · AnimalsMILLSTONE WILDLIF…NEW HAMPSHIRE TURTLE RESCUE INC: $43,000 · AnimalsNEW HAMPSHIRE TUR…BUZZARDS BAY COALITION: $75,000 · EnvironmentBUZZARDS B…SIPPICAN LANDS TRUST INC: $70,000 · EnvironmentSIPPICAN L…RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $5,000 · EnvironmentNICAPHOTO INC: $60,885 · EducationSUNY MARITIME FOUNDATION INC: $27,250 · EducationSaint Louis Fashion Fund: $19,000 · EducationHOME WORKS - THVP: $6,000 · EducationVERMONT ACADEMY: $5,000 · EducationFOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC: $32,000 · Food & NutritionSt Johns Bread & Life Program Inc: $31,500 · Food & NutritionBROOKLINE FOOD PANTRY INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $9,500 · Food & NutritionNICA NADADORES INC: $48,000 · Youth DevelopmentWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE: $20,500 · Youth DevelopmentKINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL: $14,000 · Youth DevelopmentISLAND HOUSING TRUST: $24,000 · Housing & ShelterGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $22,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$944,833Animals$261,666Environment$150,000Education$118,135Food & Nutrition$88,000Youth Development$82,500Housing & Shelter$46,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAYLA'S ACRES NO-KILL ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $145,000 over 5y, 7.7% of budgetBUZZARDS BAY COALITION: $75,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMILLSTONE WILDLIFE CENTER: $73,666 over 2y, 47% of budgetSIPPICAN LANDS TRUST INC: $70,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetNICAPHOTO INC: $60,885 over 7y, 13% of budgetNICA NADADORES INC: $48,000 over 5y, 7.2% of budgetHUNGER FREE AMERICA INC: $37,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC: $32,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSt Johns Bread & Life Program Inc: $31,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSUNY MARITIME FOUNDATION INC: $27,250 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMount Desert Island Biological Laboratory: $26,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetISLAND HOUSING TRUST: $24,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $22,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE: $20,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSaint Louis Fashion Fund: $19,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetVeterans Northeast Outreach Center Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBROOKLINE FOOD PANTRY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL: $14,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSWIM STRONG FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetMarion Art Center Inc: $12,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBuzzards Bay Area Habitat For Humanity Inc: $11,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetAcacia Network Inc: $10,500 over 2y, 20% of budgetAbortion Action Missouri Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetHAWTHORN LEADERSHIP SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFeeding America: $9,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MONMOUTH COUNTY: $6,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCASA DE SALUD: $6,250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOME WORKS - THVP: $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBACK ON MY FEET: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AYLA'S ACRES NO-KILL ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds BUZZARDS BAY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds MILLSTONE WILDLIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SIPPICAN LANDS TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds NICAPHOTO INC ↗
  • Who funds NICA NADADORES INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE TURTLE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER FREE AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds St Johns Bread & Life Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds SUNY MARITIME FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND HOUSING TRUST ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Saint Louis Fashion Fund ↗
  • Who funds Veterans Northeast Outreach Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLINE FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds KINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL ↗
  • Who funds SWIM STRONG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Marion Art Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Buzzards Bay Area Habitat For Humanity Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · The Chicago Community Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cove Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cove Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Buzzards Bay Coalition: 37% of income from government
  • Food for Free Committee Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Marion Art Center Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cove’s filings →

More from the funding graph