Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

The Council for Canadian American Relations Inc

The organization's mission is to advance the public's appreciation of the arts by conducting programs and activities in canada and the u.s.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$340k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.

Arts & Culture$8.3MEducation$557kInternational$494kEnvironment$27kPhilanthropy$7kOther$77k
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 28 grants below total $1,629,158 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,000,773 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $371,615 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $376k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $578k
  • $250k+2 grants · $640k
$20,984
Median grant
8
States reached
$7.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION$340,079
HIRSHHORN MUSEUM$300,000
VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART$228,000
ARTIS-NAPLES$155,098
THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$135,000
NEW MUSEUM$60,315
FRIENDS OF NEW CURATORS$41,643
ANTIQUE BOAT MUSEUM$38,000
THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$34,200
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY$32,288
SANTA FE OPERA$29,925
METROPOLITAN OPERA$28,224
OPERA AMERICA$23,510
BETH MORRISON PROJECTS$20,984
DIA ART FOUNDATION$20,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 86% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS (BOSTON): $142k → 16%MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART (MOCA): $300k → 14%WHITNEY MUSEUM: $95k → 17%VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART: $228k → 12%MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS (BOSTON): $50k → 16%MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART (MOCA LA): $205k → 14%WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $55k → 17%FRIENDS OF THE NEW CURATORS: $200k → 14%VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART: $190k → 12%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $250k → 14%MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART (MOCA): $100k → 14%WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $50k → 17%FRIENDS OF THE NEW CURATORS: $100k → 14%THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $135k → 14%LA OPERA: $54k → 14%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $50k → 14%DIA ART FOUNDATION: $80k → 17%ARTIS-NAPLES: $155k → 10%MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $150k → 14%ARTIS-NAPLES: $147k → 10%ARTIS-NAPLES: $81k → 10%HIRSHHORN MUSEUM: $300k → 14%ARTIS NAPLES: $53k → 10%HIRSHHORN MUSEUM: $150k → 14%HIRSHHORN MUSEUM: $140k → 14%SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $72k → 14%TATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $340k → 17%SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $71k → 14%TATE AMERICA FOUNDATION: $237k → 17%TATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $204k → 17%TATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $168k → 17%TATE AMERICA FOUNDATION: $100k → 17%TATE AMERICA FOUNDATION: $95k → 17%THE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CTR OF POMPIDOU: $86k → 17%TATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $82k → 17%TATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $66k → 17%THE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $264k → 17%THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $504k → 17%THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART (KENT MONKMAN): $223k → 17%MOMA: $311k → 17%MOMA - INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL: $299k → 17%MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $137k → 17%MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $81k → 17%PEN AMERICA: $87k → 17%PEN AMERICA: $75k → 17%PEN AMERICA: $59k → 17%NEW MUSEUM: $60k → 17%INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY: $52k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
NM
DC
LA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $365k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$365k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: ART EDUCATION

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.1M · 35 repeat orgs$369k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

35 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
18

Total granted

$9.1M
$316k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+1%

Still filing today

100%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalEducationPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    TATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +190%
  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $787k · revenue +33%
  • TM
    THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES
    4× · 2018–2021 · $778k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES OPERA COMPANY
    one grant, 2018 · $54k · revenue -11%
  • TM
    THE METROPLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    one grant, 2024 · $31k
  • TN
    THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2024 · $28k · revenue -5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
2
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
3
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
4
The Phillips Collection

The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…

Arts & Culture
5
San Diego Museum of Art

To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

Arts & Culture
6
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
7
Institute of Contemporary Art Miami Inc

The institute of contemporary art, miami (ica miami), is dedicated to promoting the work of contemporary artists, and to the exchange of art and ideas throughout the miami region and internationally. through an energetic calendar of…

Arts & Culture
8
Clyfford Still Museum

Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.

Arts & Culture
9
Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery

The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
10
Berggruen Institute
Education
11
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
12
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Museum of Contemporary Art Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCommunity Arts CentersJewish Community Organizati…Environmental Conservation …Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Local History Museums
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%2%<5yr14%2%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr19%14%20–35yr13%41%35–55yr16%34%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr19%13%20–35yr13%44%35–55yr16%28%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/60
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,700

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/58
Grantees still filing
37/58
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION — $1,292,346 · Arts & CultureTATE AMERICAS FOUNDATIONSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $786,613 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES — $777,810 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELESTHE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART INC — $775,494 · Arts & CultureTHE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART INCMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $760,950 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTARTIS-NAPLES INC — $563,710 · Arts & CultureARTIS-NAPLES INCVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC — $418,000 · Arts & CultureMetropolitan Opera Association Inc — $369,868 · Arts & CultureWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $304,711 · Arts & Culture+36 more — $2,257,433 · Arts & Culture+36 moreTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $471,643 · EducationNew York University — $80,000 · Education+1 more — $5,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF NEW CURATORS INC — $358,434 · InternationalAmerican Friends of the Centre Pompidou Inc — $121,571 · International+1 more — $13,509 · InternationalTHE METROPLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $31,350 · OtherMETROPOLE FILM BOARD INC CO OREN JACOBY — $18,319 · OtherTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS — $12,776 · OtherHISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INC — $9,500 · OtherTHE ANDY WARHOL FOUNDATION FOR THE VISUAL ARTS INC — $5,000 · OtherNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $26,563 · EnvironmentJULES OLITSKI ART FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$8,306,935Education$556,643International$493,514Other$76,945Environment$26,563Philanthropy$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION — $1,292,346 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $786,613 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES — $777,810 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART INC — $775,494 over 6y, 15% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $760,950 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC — $563,710 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $471,643 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC — $418,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMetropolitan Opera Association Inc — $369,868 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF NEW CURATORS INC — $358,434 over 4y, 18% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $304,711 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC — $262,787 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art — $217,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON — $192,192 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SANTA FE OPERA — $179,289 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY (LONDON) FOUNDATION INC — $167,088 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetTHE ANTIQUE BOAT MUSEUM — $129,586 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetBUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY — $128,380 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC — $128,250 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Friends of the Centre Pompidou Inc — $121,571 over 4y, 12% of budgetDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $100,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNew Museum of Contemporary Art — $94,316 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOPERA AMERICA INC — $92,099 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetNew York University — $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY — $68,386 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLOS ANGELES OPERA COMPANY — $54,456 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHEATREZONEINC — $37,532 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetCURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC — $36,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION — $36,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $30,004 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC — $27,550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTORM KING ART CENTER — $27,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $26,563 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK THEATRE WORKSHOP INC — $22,921 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBETH MORRISON PROJECTS INC — $20,984 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Art and Preservation in Embassies — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLUNA COMPOSITION LAB INC — $19,950 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetMETROPOLE FILM BOARD INC CO OREN JACOBY — $18,319 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE DRAWING CENTER INC — $17,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY — $17,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHouston Grand Opera Association Inc — $14,963 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FUND FOR THE SOUTHBANK CENTRE INC C/O MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP — $13,509 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS — $12,776 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WORTH ART ASSOCIATION — $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSarasota Opera Association Inc — $11,354 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWALKER ART CENTER — $10,001 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Cha…The Annenberg Foundat…The Aaron Copland Fun…National Philanthropi…Virginia B Toulmin Ch…May and Samuel Rudin …Ag FoundationThe J Paul Getty TrustThe Ford FoundationThe Ayco Charitable F…The San Francisco Fou…Jewish Communal Fund
The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY17.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Annenberg Foundation · The Aaron Copland Fund for Music Inc Co Alter Kendrick & Baron LLP · National Philanthropic Trust · Virginia B Toulmin Charitable Foundation III · May and Samuel Rudin Family Foundation Inc · Ag Foundation · The J Paul Getty Trust · The Ford Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Council for Canadian American Relations Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Historical Association of Southern Florida Inc — 2% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines