Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Coughlan Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$93kHuman Services$43kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kPhilanthropy$13kFood & Nutrition$3kHealth$1kRecreation & Sports$700Education$600Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$720
Median grant
7
States reached
$74k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAUSA$2,700
INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS$1,200
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$720
COVENANT HOUSE$720
CANADIAN LANDMINE FOUNDATION$250
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$240
FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY$112
Individual grant recipient$35
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 90% of grant dollars ($154k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 10% that went abroad ($18k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 46% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY: $672 → 11%JOHN HENRY FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%MAYFIELD SENIOR SCHOOL: $100 → 14%LAUISAN FRIARS OF THE ATONEMENT: $30 → 6%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $3k → 17%FAUSA: $3k → 16%NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC: $35 → 14%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY: $500 → 17%ADPI FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%FAUSA: $5k → 12%RIGHT TO BE FREE: $5k → 8%FRASNCISCA FRIARS OF THE ATONOMEJ: $25 → 14%ASIAN RESOURCE FOUNDATION USA INC: $71k → 11%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $3k → 19%FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY: $672 → 11%USC ASSOC: $500 → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $3k → 17%ADPI FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%GREAT LAKES ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $700 → 8%ROBYN'S NEST: $500 → 14%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $3k → 19%FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY: $672 → 11%INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $5k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $3k → 17%NSSD FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 14%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $3k → 19%FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY: $672 → 11%INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $1k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $3k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $3k → 14%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $3k → 19%FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY: $672 → 11%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $3k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $3k → 14%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $3k → 19%FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY: $112 → 11%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $240 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $3k → 14%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $720 → 19%COVENANT HOUSE: $3k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE: $720 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
CA
CO
MO
MD
AR
DC
GA
TX

Beyond the US: 10% of all-years giving ($18k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$17k · 4 grants
Canada$250 · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$90k · 9 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +1% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
13

Total granted

$90k
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
0%

Still filing today

33%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $285 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $17k
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $17k
  • CR
    CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $15k

Funded once

  • AR
    ASIAN RESOURCE FOUNDATION USA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $71k · 98% of their budget
  • RT
    RIGHT TO BE FREE
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -12%
  • JH
    JOHN HENRY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
3
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
4
International Rescue Committee Inc

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.

International
5
International Service for Human Rights Inc

The organization's primary mission is supporting human rights defenders and strengthening human rights systems.

Civil Rights
6
Mercy Corps

Our mission is to alleviate suffering, poverty and oppression by helping people build secure, productive and just communities.

International
7
Muso Inc

Muso works to create a cure for delay because no one should die waiting for health care.

International
8
Shift Project Ltd

At Shift, we have one purpose: to transform how business gets done in order to ensure respect for peoples lives and dignity. We believe that the best way to advance our mission is by working directly with Businesses to help shape their…

International
9
International Committee of the Red Cross

The international committee of the red cross (switzerland)(icrc) is an impartial, neutral, and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and of violence…

International
10
Rehabilitation International

The organization is a federation of national and international organizations and agencies. It develops and promotes initiatives to protect the rights of people with disabilities, to improve rehabilitation and other crucial services for…

Health
11
Childfund International Usa

Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…

International
12
International Association for Suicide Prevention

IASP is dedicated to preventing suicide and suicidal behaviour alleviating its effects and providing a forum for academics mental health professionals crisis workers volunteers and suicide survivors.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children International; the most unlike its peers is Marquette University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASIAN RESOURCE FOUNDATION USA INC: $70,600 · InternationalASIAN RESOURCE FOUNDATION USA INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $14,640 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $6,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS+1 more: $1,931 · InternationalCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION: $17,280 · OtherCHARITIES AID FOUNDATIONCOVENANT HOUSE: $17,140 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSECATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $15,120 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESFAUSA: $7,700 · OtherFAUSAADPI FOUNDATION: $6,501 · OtherADPI FOUNDATIONFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY: $3,472 · Other+10 more: $3,590 · OtherRIGHT TO BE FREE: $5,000 · PhilanthropyJOHN HENRY FOUNDATION: $1,225 · HealthGREAT LAKES ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $700 · HealthMarquette University: $500 · Education
International$93,171Other$70,803Philanthropy$5,000Health$1,925Education$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASIAN RESOURCE FOUNDATION USA INC: $70,600 over 1y, 98% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $14,640 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRIGHT TO BE FREE: $5,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetChildren International: $1,931 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN HENRY FOUNDATION: $1,225 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREAT LAKES ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMarquette University: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASIAN RESOURCE FOUNDATION USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds RIGHT TO BE FREE ↗
  • Who funds Children International ↗
  • Who funds JOHN HENRY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREAT LAKES ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Marquette University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA11.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Coughlan Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Coughlan Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Coughlan Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph