Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cory Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$115k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$170kHealth$110kYouth Development$100kArts & Culture$75kEducation$45kRecreation & Sports$35kReligion$10kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $110k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOME OF THE INNOCENTS$20,000
GILDA'S CLUB LOUISVILLE$20,000
PORTLAND MUSEUM$10,000
LOUISVILLE FENCING CENTER$10,000
ST JOSEPH CHILDREN'S HOME$10,000
KENTUCKY SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$10,000
CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE$10,000
LOUISVILLE YOUTH ORCHESTRA$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF KENTUCKIANA$10,000
LOUISVILLE ZOO$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $40k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $20k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $20k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $20k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $20k → 15%CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $10k → 15%CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $10k → 15%CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $10k → 15%CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $10k → 15%CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$535k · 9 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$535k
$11k

Still filing today

89%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $120k · revenue +143%
  • GC
    GILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $110k · revenue +16%
  • CP
    CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • HT
    HOLY TRINITY PARISH
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Kentucky Youth Orchestra Society Inc

To provide, in cooperation with public and private schools, equitable access to the highest quality musical opportunities and to foster a life- long love of music for dedicated young musicians. ckyo enriches the lives of its student…

—
2
Louisville Collegiate School

Louisville collegiate school inspires academic excellence, extraordinary character and global citizenship.

Education
3
Ky Access to Justice Commission Inc

To increase access to the courts and high-quality legal representation for people with low and moderate incomes living in kentucky through innovative partnerships with the judiciary, the civil legal aid programs, private bar, law schools,…

Crime & Legal
4
Lexington Children's Theatre Inc

To provide professional theatre experiences for young audiences. to provide quality theatre education for young people annually. lct provides quality theatre experiences and theatre arts education for as many as 150,000 children throughout…

Arts & Culture
5
Kentucky Tennis Association Inc

To promote the development of tennis as a means of healthful recreation and physical fitness in the Commonwealth of Kentucky.

—
6
Kentucky Center for Economic Policy Inc

To improve the quality of life for all kentuckians through research, education and advocacy on important policy issues facing the commonwealth.

Public Benefit
7
Civiclex Incorporated

Civiclex strengthens civic health in lexington, kentucky, by helping our community understand and get involved in local issues, connect with their neighbors and make decisions in a better way.

Arts & Culture
8
Kentucky Golf Foundation Inc

Through the framework of the greatest game ever played, the kentucky golf foundation seeks to impact kentucky's youth, military and those of diversity using golf as a toolkit.

Arts & Culture
9
Kentucky Golf Association Inc

To foster, promote and advance the interests and the true spirit of the game of golf throughout the commonwealth of kentucky, and in conjunction therewith to lend its cooperation and assistance to the united states golf association, and to…

Recreation & Sports
10
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Kentuckiana Inc

To create and support mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—
11
Goodwill Industries of Kentucky Inc

Goodwill's mission is to help people with disabilities or other disadvantages achieve and maintain employment to gain a better quality of life.

Employment
12
Kentucky Derby Museum Corporation

To engage,educate, and excite everyone about the extraordinary experience that is the kentucky derby!

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cabbage Patch Settlement House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Louisville Fencing Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC: $110,000 · OtherGILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INCST JOSEPH CATHOLIC ORPHAN SOCIETY: $50,000 · OtherST JOSEPH CATHOLIC ORPHAN SOCIETYTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC: $50,000 · OtherTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INCPORTLAND MUSEUM INC: $30,000 · OtherPORTLAND MUSEUM INCHOLY TRINITY PARISH: $10,000 · Other+2 more: $6,000 · OtherTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC: $120,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INCCABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesCABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INCLOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY YOUTH ORCHESTRA INC: $45,000 · Arts & CultureLOUISVILL…KENTUCKY SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND CHARITABLE: $45,000 · EducationKENTUCKY …LOUISVILLE FENCING CENTER INC: $35,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$256,000Human Services$170,000Arts & Culture$45,000Education$45,000Recreation & Sports$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC: $120,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC: $110,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY YOUTH ORCHESTRA INC: $45,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetKENTUCKY SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND CHARITABLE: $45,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetLOUISVILLE FENCING CENTER INC: $35,000 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetPORTLAND MUSEUM INC: $30,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY YOUTH ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND CHARITABLE ↗
  • Who funds LOUISVILLE FENCING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTLAND MUSEUM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kosair Charities Committee IncKY17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kosair Charities Committee Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Fund for the Arts Inc · Cralle Foundation Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · The Porcinifarmer Childrens Foundation Inc · V V Cooke Foundation Corporation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cory Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cory Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cory’s filings →

    More from the funding graph