· Public charity
American Conservation Coalition Inc
The AMERICAN CONSERVATION COALITION INC.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $461,600 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $480,100 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $18,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
- $250k+1 grant · $374k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN MOMENT | $374,000 |
| THE BREAKTHROUGH INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN AFFAIRS FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| TURNING POINT USA INC | $14,200 |
| STATE POLICY NETWORK | $10,900 |
| CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS FORUM | $10,000 |
| WESTERN CAUCUS FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Facilitate a clean energy dialogue among center-right leaders and activists. by depoliticizing the issue, we will then have created the capacity and credibility to educate and advocate for clean energy policy among conservatives and lead…
To research and develop centrist policy ideas.
To educate the public on constitutional issues and public policy matters. We are dedicated to the principles of individual liberty, peace through strength, limited government, free enterprise, and the values embodied in the Declaration of…
To educate journalists and the public, and foster public debate, about improving political journalism to reflect public needs and hold the powerful accountable.
Capri usa is a nongovernmental, nonpartisan, international organization founded in 2024 to enhance global resilience and promote innovative policy by drawing on the experience of the asia-pacific region through interdisciplinary public…
Third way institute supports charitable and educational activities that advance centrist solutions to major economic, national security, energy and social policy issues.
Research and education of United Nations activities
To advance policies that promote limited government, support economic growth and business, and seek strong international relationships that enhance American national security and trade objectives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions Forum and the most unlike its peers is Mmac Community Support Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MMAC COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds American Moment Inc ↗
- Who funds Conservative Climate Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds The Breakthrough Institute ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN AFFAIRS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds STATE POLICY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds MAVERICKS INC ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS FORUM ↗
- Who funds WESTERN CAUCUS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Conservation Coalition Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.