Skip to content

· Public charity

The Community Fund of Darien

Promote and support the efforts of various local charitable organizations and new community initiatives

$790k
Granted FY2025still arriving
39
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.8MYouth Development$1.7MHousing & Shelter$913kCommunity Improvement$565kHealth$355kEducation$229kFood & Nutrition$98kCrime & Legal$90kOther$0
02FY2025 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $703k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$16,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$50,000
OPEN DOOR SHELTER$45,000
CARVER CENTER$45,000
FAMILY CENTERS$41,000
PACIFIC HOUSE$36,000
MID-FAIRFIELD COMMUNITY CARE CENTER$35,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
Individual grant recipient$32,000
INSPIRICA$30,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER$28,000
NEW COVENANT CENTER$28,000
Individual grant recipient$27,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
FAMILY AND CHILDRENS AGENCY$25,000
FILLING IN THE BLANKS$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of The Community Fund of Darien’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 10% of the giving stays in CT; by stated purpose, 12%.

The Community Fund of Darienlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.4M · 42 repeat orgs$649k to everyone else

42 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
34

Total granted

$5.4M
$618k

Still filing today

0%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FAMILY CENTERS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $305k
  • OD
    OPEN DOOR SHELTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $284k
  • CG
    CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER OF SOUTHERN CT
    8× · 2017–2025 · $267k

Funded once

  • TO
    THE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +45%
  • CG
    CHILD GUIDANCE OF MID FAIRFIELD
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • PT
    PERSON TO PERSON INC
    one grant, 2023 · $38k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Family Services of Greenwich

Jewish family services of greenwich (jfs) is a nonprofit social service agency dedicated to strengthening individuals and families in fairfield and new london counties. jfs provides behavioral health counseling, food security programs,…

—
2
Women and Families Center

Wfc is committed to promoting equity and to improving quality of life through services that foster empowerment and independence. our guiding vision: to be the leading agent for positive social change.

Human Services
3
Windham Regional Community Council Inc

Windham regional community council, inc (wrcc) is committed to improving the health and social well-being of the residents of eastern connecticut.

—
4
Family and Children's Aid Inc

Fca is a community-based behavioral health center that offers innovation, responsive and traditional mental health care and services for children, adolescents, adults and their families.

Human Services
5
Rushford Center Inc

Rushford Center, Inc., is dedicated to meeting the substance abuse and mental health needs of children, adults and families. Working cooperatively with our Hartford HealthCare network partners and others who share our goals, Rushford…

Health
6
Children's Home of Poughkeepsie Inc

The children's home of poughkeepsie is one of the oldest child welfare agencies in the nation. on january 21, 1847, a group of poughkeepsie women met to form the female guardian society to care for the poor, abandoned and neglected in…

Human Services
7
The Brien Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…

Health
8
Argus Community Inc

Argus community's mission is to provide innovative programs which help severely disadvantaged teens and adults to free themselves from poverty and drug abuse and build new lives based on responsibility, work, and hope. argus provides a…

Health
9
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc was established to provide comprehensive services to individuals/families with special needs to enable them to reach their highest level of independence and integration into the community.

Human Services
10
Continuum of Care Inc

To provide comprehensive community based residential and support services that enable persons with psychiatric and developmental disabilities to live as fully in the community as possible.

—
11
Family & Children Services Inc

Family & children services strengthens the safety and well being of children, individuals and families; accomplished by providing a comprehensive array of critical human services.

Human Services
12
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Liberation Programs Inc; the most unlike its peers is Food Rescue Us Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILY CENTERS: $305,000 · OtherOPEN DOOR SHELTER: $283,500 · OtherCHILD GUIDANCE CENTER OF SOUTHERN CT: $267,000 · OtherCARVER CENTER: $267,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $263,000 · OtherPACIFIC HOUSE: $260,500 · OtherINSPIRICA: $237,000 · OtherCHILD GUIDANCE CENTER OF MID FAIRFIELD: $226,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $212,000 · OtherFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY: $193,000 · Other+58 more: $3,260,753 · Other+58 moreBUILDING ONE COMMUNITY CORP: $26,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $21,000 · Human ServicesFILLING IN THE BLANKS INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesSAINT JOSEPH PARENTING CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INC: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterPACIFIC HOUSE INC: $31,000 · Housing & ShelterPERSON TO PERSON INC: $38,000 · PhilanthropyLIBERATION PROGRAMS INC: $20,000 · HealthABILIS INC: $15,000 · HealthFOOD RESCUE US INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionALL OUR KIN INC: $15,000 · Education
Other$5,774,753Human Services$102,000Housing & Shelter$71,000Philanthropy$38,000Health$35,000Food & Nutrition$15,000Education$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPERSON TO PERSON INC: $38,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY CENTERS INC: $36,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINSPIRICA INC: $33,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPACIFIC HOUSE INC: $31,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBUILDING ONE COMMUNITY CORP: $26,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKIDS IN CRISIS INC: $22,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $21,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFILLING IN THE BLANKS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLIBERATION PROGRAMS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAUREL HOUSE INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFOOD RESCUE US INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL OUR KIN INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABILIS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOMUS KIDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF STAMFORD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ROWAN CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH PARENTING CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetINTEMPO ORGANIZATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PERSON TO PERSON INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CENTERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Near and Far Association IncCT30.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Near and Far Association Inc · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · New Canaan Community Foundation Inc · Stamford Rotary Trust Fund · The Tudor Foundation Inc · The Herbert & Nell Singer Foundation Inc · The Pitney Bowes Foundation · Impact 100 Fairfield County · Elizabeth Raymond Ambler Trust · Steven & Alexandra Cohen Foundation Inc · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Peoples United Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Community Fund of Darien funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Community Fund of Darien. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 24%
  • Abilis Inc: 74% of income from government
  • Laurel House Inc: 68% of income from government
  • Saint Joseph Parenting Center Inc: 51% of income from government
  • Kids in Crisis Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Family & Children's Agency Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Pacific House Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Inspirica Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Liberation Programs Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Family Centers Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Stamford Inc: 17% of income from government
  • The Open Door Shelter Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Crisis Center: 10% of income from government
  • Domus Kids Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Person to Person Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Intempo Organization Inc: 2% of income from government
  • All Our Kin Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Community Fund of Darien’s filings →

More from the funding graph