Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Collins Companies Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$640k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Environment$774kRecreation & Sports$690kHuman Services$660kPublic Safety & Disaster$453kFood & Nutrition$350kCommunity Improvement$259kHealth$212kEducation$162kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $199k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $420k
$45,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL$150,000
RUTH M SMITH CENTER$90,000
NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION$70,000
KLAMATH FAMILY HEAD START$60,000
KANE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$50,000
ALMANOR BASIN FOOD PANTRY$45,000
LAKE COUNTY FOOD SHARE$45,000
SIERRA HOSPICE$40,000
KANE AREA FOOD PANTRY$30,000
KANE COMMUNITY CENTER$28,975
SOLID GROUND EQUINE ASSISTED ACTIVITIES AND THERAPY CENTER$10,000
KLAMATH LAKE COUNTIES FOOD BANK$7,500
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF KLAMATH BASIN$7,500
KANE AREA REVITALIZATION ENTERPRISE$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $180k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RUTH M SMITH CENTER: $90k → 14%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF KLAMATH BASIN: $10k → 16%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF KLAMATH BASIN: $8k → 16%Assistance League of Klamath Basin: $5k → 16%Assistance League of Klamath Basin: $5k → 16%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF KLAMATH BASIN: $5k → 16%Assistance League of Klamath Basin: $5k → 16%SIERRA HOSPICE: $40k → 13%SIERRA HOSPICE: $12k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of The Collins Companies Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Collins Companies Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.5% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 25 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
27

Total granted

$2.2M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+55%

Still filing today

52%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $420k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LUTHERAN HOME AT KANE
    4× · 2018–2022 · $347k · revenue +22%
  • AB
    Almanor Basin Food Pantry
    7× · 2017–2025 · $119k · revenue +5% · 72% of their budget
  • KA
    KANE AREA REVITALIZATION ENTERPRISE
    4× · 2018–2025 · $95k · revenue +201% · 69% of their budget

Funded once

  • TO
    TOWN OF LAKEVIEW OREGON
    one grant, 2022 · $200k
  • NL
    NORTH LAKE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $150k
  • TA
    TRAIL ASSOCIATION OF THE MCKEAN ELK DIVIDE
    one grant, 2024 · $118k · 62% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Klamath Lake Land Trust

Preserving the natural legacy of the upper klamath basin.

2
Klamath Trail Alliance

Build and maintain non-motorized recreational trails in and around Klamath County

Recreation & Sports
3
Klamath Forest Alliance

The primary purposes for which Klamath Forest Alliance is organized is to act in the public interest by promoting sustainable ecosystems and communities.

Environment
4
Lake Kanasatka Watershed Assoc

Established to promote the conservation of the quality of the environment of the area in the watershed of Lake Kanasatka, including the conservation of the natural resources of the land, water, marshland, woodland and open spaces, as well…

Environment
5
Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center

KS Wilds mission is to protect and restore wild nature in the Klamath-Siskiyou region of southwest Oregon and northwest California.

Environment
6
Kennett Area Trails Alliance
Recreation & Sports
7
Katawba Valley Land Trust

The mission of the katawba valley land trust is to protect the natural resources, cultural resources, open lands, waters, and vistas of aesthetic value in the catawba river valley and surrounding areas.

Environment
8
Klamath Co Economic Development Assn

The organization's mission is to promote new and existing business development in southern oregon.

9
Kaniksu Land Trust Inc

Caring for the lands and people of the Kaniksu Region, today, tomorrow, and forever.

Environment
10
Klamath Works Inc

To create total community commitment for helping people in need by developing a campus and programs of holistic and collaborative services with the goal of self-sufficiency based upon effort and reward.

Employment
11
Kane Area Industrial Development Corporation

To assist in the recruitment of new business and industry and to work with existing business and industry to retain present levels and provide for future growth.

12
Wallowa Land Trust

Our mission is to protect the rural nature of Wallowa County by working cooperatively with private landowners,indigenous people, local communities and governmental entities to conserve land.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Klamath Family Head Start and the most unlike its peers is Robotics Education & Competition Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Senior LivingFood Pantries & AssistanceAnimal Rescue and AdoptionUnited Way FederationsPublic Library SupportLand Conservation Organizat…Community Arts OrganizationsVolunteer Fire DepartmentsCommunity Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%6%<5yr13%11%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr17%26%20–35yr15%26%35–55yr17%6%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%9%<5yr13%6%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr17%34%20–35yr15%31%35–55yr17%4%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/36
the rest of the field
9%
7,128/78,126

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LUTHERAN HOME AT KANE — $346,778 · OtherLUTHERAN HOME AT KANETOWN OF LAKEVIEW OREGON — $200,000 · OtherTOWN OF LAKEVIEW OREGONNORTH LAKE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $150,000 · OtherNORTH LAKE COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONCHESTER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT — $118,889 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $105,000 · OtherYMCA OF KLAMATH COUNTY — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $89,248 · OtherALMANOR RECREATION AND PARK DISTRIC — $80,000 · OtherSENECA HEALTH CARE DISTRICT — $80,000 · OtherKANE AREA FOOD PANTRY — $79,000 · OtherKANE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $88,985 · OtherKEYSTONE RURAL HEALTH CONSORTIA INC — $80,000 · Other+30 more — $777,816 · Other+30 moreHEADWATERS CHARITABLE TRUST — $439,450 · PhilanthropyHEADWATERS CHARI…ROTARY CLUB OF LAKEVIEW OREGON FOUNDATIO — $100,000 · PhilanthropyROTARY CLUB OF L…+1 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropyTRAIL ASSOCIATION OF THE MCKEAN ELK DIVIDE — $118,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION — $70,000 · Recreation & SportsKLAMATH FALLS BMX — $44,090 · Recreation & SportsAlmanor Basin Food Pantry — $119,000 · Food & NutritionLAKE COUNTY FOOD SHARE INC — $95,000 · Food & NutritionRUTH M SMITH CENTER — $90,000 · Human ServicesSIERRA HOSPICE — $52,000 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF KLAMATH BASIN — $37,500 · Human ServicesPENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL INC — $150,000 · EnvironmentKANE AREA REVITALIZATION ENTERPRISE — $94,675 · Arts & CultureTHE MCKEAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $28,080 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $3,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,295,716Philanthropy$549,450Recreation & Sports$232,090Food & Nutrition$214,000Human Services$179,500Environment$150,000Arts & Culture$126,255

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHEADWATERS CHARITABLE TRUST — $439,450 over 5y, 24% of budgetLUTHERAN HOME AT KANE — $346,778 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetAlmanor Basin Food Pantry — $119,000 over 7y, 72% of budgetTRAIL ASSOCIATION OF THE MCKEAN ELK DIVIDE — $118,000 over 1y, 62% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF LAKEVIEW OREGON FOUNDATIO — $100,000 over 1y, 60% of budgetLAKE COUNTY FOOD SHARE INC — $95,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetKANE AREA REVITALIZATION ENTERPRISE — $94,675 over 4y, 69% of budgetKANE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $88,985 over 3y, 33% of budgetKEYSTONE RURAL HEALTH CONSORTIA INC — $80,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSOLID GROUND EAATC — $55,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetSIERRA HOSPICE — $52,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetFRIENDS MEMORIAL PUBLIC LIBRARY — $44,637 over 4y, 18% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF KLAMATH BASIN — $37,500 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetKLAMATH LAKE COUNTIES FOOD BANK — $32,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetKane Area Community Center Inc — $30,682 over 4y, 13% of budgetTHE MCKEAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $28,080 over 1y, 26% of budgetKane Treehouse — $12,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of the Columbia-Willamette — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLUMAS COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE CORPORATION — $8,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetROBOTICS EDUCATION & COMPETITION FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAYA — $3,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEADWATERS CHARITABLE TRUST
  • Who funds LUTHERAN HOME AT KANE
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds Almanor Basin Food Pantry
  • Who funds TRAIL ASSOCIATION OF THE MCKEAN ELK DIVIDE
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF LAKEVIEW OREGON FOUNDATIO
  • Who funds LAKE COUNTY FOOD SHARE INC
  • Who funds KANE AREA REVITALIZATION ENTERPRISE
  • Who funds RUTH M SMITH CENTER
  • Who funds KANE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
  • Who funds KEYSTONE RURAL HEALTH CONSORTIA INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KLAMATH FAMILY HEAD START
  • Who funds SOLID GROUND EAATC
  • Who funds SIERRA HOSPICE
  • Who funds FRIENDS MEMORIAL PUBLIC LIBRARY
  • Who funds KLAMATH FALLS BMX
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF KLAMATH BASIN
  • Who funds KLAMATH LAKE COUNTIES FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Kane Area Community Center Inc
  • Who funds THE MCKEAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Northwest Charitable FoundationPA17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Northwest Charitable Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Community Foundation of the Northern Alleghenies · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · Kane Community Development Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Collins Companies Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 21%
  • Klamath Family Head Start98% of income from government
  • United Way of the Columbia-Willamette25% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank21% of income from government
  • Playa5% of income from government
  • Solid Ground Eaatc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Collins Companies Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Collins Companies Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph