Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Colburn Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$96k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$464kHealth$89kEnvironment$46kCivil Rights$46kAnimals$6kReligion$6kRecreation & Sports$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS BOSTON$33,000
THE NATIONAL TRUST FOR SCOTLAND FOUNDATION$10,000
GBH$9,500
THE TRUSTEE OF RESERVATION$9,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$8,000
THE BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$7,000
BEVERLY HOSPITAL$2,500
THE UNITED WAY OF BAY$2,000
MANCHESTER ESSEX CONSERVATION$2,000
SPAULDING REHAB HOSPITAL$2,000
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION$2,000
ISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM$1,200
THE FRICK COLLECTIONS$1,200
SURFRIDE FOUNDATION$1,200
SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST US$1,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$645k · 26 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
6

Total granted

$645k
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+29%

Still filing today

27%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS BOSTON
    9× · 2017–2025 · $220k
  • TN
    THE NATIONAL TRUST FOR SCOTLAND FOUNDATION USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $92k · revenue +191%
  • MG
    MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $68k

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGOgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue +29%
  • MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +7%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
The Museum of Fine Arts Houston

The museum of fine arts, houston serves as a welcoming and inclusive place for all people, connecting the communities of houston with diverse histories of art spanning 6,000 years and six continents. through our permanent collections,…

Arts & Culture
3
Metropolitan Museum of Art

The metropolitan museum of art collects, studies, conserves, and presents significant works of art across all times and cultures in order to connect people to creativity, knowledge, and ideas.

Arts & Culture
4
Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery

The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
5
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
6
Clyfford Still Museum

Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.

Arts & Culture
7
Newport Art Museum and Art Association

The newport art museum's mission is to share a diversity of art and experiences that spark reflection, inspiration, and connection within our newport community and beyond. the museum was founded in 1912 on the belief that arts and culture…

Arts & Culture
8
The Connecticut River Foundation At Steamboat Dock Inc

The connecticut river museum's mission is to deepen appreciation of the river's history and to inspire its stewardship by providing unique educational and recreational experiences to diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
9
New York Historical Society

The founding mission of the new-york historical society ("the new york historical "tnyh") is to collect, preserve, and interpret, for the broadest possible public, material relevant to the history of the united states in general and of new…

Arts & Culture
10
The Newark Museum Association

Nmoa mission statement is: we welcome everyone with inclusive experiences that spark curiosity and foster community.

Arts & Culture
11
Massachusetts Historical Society

To promote understanding of the history of massachusetts and the nation by collecting and communicating materials and resources that foster historical knowledge.

Arts & Culture
12
Baltimore Museum of Art

The baltimore museum of art connects art to baltimore and baltimore to the world, embodying a commitment to artistic excellence and social equity in every decision from art presentation, interpretation, and collecting, to the composition…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustees of Reservations; the most unlike its peers is Conservation Law Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS BOSTON: $220,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS BOSTONMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $68,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE TRUSEES OF RESERVATIONS: $32,000 · OtherTHE TRUSEES OF RESERVATIONSWGBH: $24,000 · OtherTHE TRUSTEE OF RESERVATION: $18,000 · OtherLIBRARY OF THE BOSTON ATHENAEUM: $17,500 · Other+17 more: $76,800 · Other+17 moreTHE NATIONAL TRUST FOR SCOTLAND FOUNDATION USA INC: $91,500 · Arts & CultureTHE NATIONAL TRUST…BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $12,000 · Arts & CultureBOSTON SYMPHONY OR…MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $8,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF FINE ART…ISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM INC: $5,200 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $60,000 · EducationTHE ART I…THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $35,000 · EnvironmentMANCHESTER ESSEX CONSERVATION TRUST: $9,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$496,300Arts & Culture$117,200Education$60,000Environment$46,000Human Services$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATIONAL TRUST FOR SCOTLAND FOUNDATION USA INC: $91,500 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMANCHESTER ESSEX CONSERVATION TRUST: $9,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $7,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM INC: $5,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR COURTAULD INSTIT: $3,200 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANCHESTER-BY-THE-SEA MUSEUM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATIONAL TRUST FOR SCOTLAND FOUNDATION USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds MANCHESTER ESSEX CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds The Frick Collection ↗
  • Who funds ISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR COURTAULD INSTIT ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds MANCHESTER-BY-THE-SEA MUSEUM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Colburn Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Colburn Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Museum of Fine Arts: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Colburn Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Colburn Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Colburn’s filings →

More from the funding graph