Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cohen Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$95kFood & Nutrition$47kPhilanthropy$33kReligion$18kCivil Rights$17kHealth$7kArts & Culture$2kEducation$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$1,030
Median grant
3
States reached
$793k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH HOMELIFE COMMUNITIES$15,000
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMI$10,000
JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES$10,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA$5,771
CONGREGATION OR VESHALOM$2,363
SOJOURN$1,030
TIME SERVED$500
CAMP TWIN LAKES$103
REPAIR THE WORLD$100
ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$100
TEMPLE SINAI$18
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TIME SERVED: $500 → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $21k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
CA
KS
TN
SC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$168k · 12 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
26

Total granted

$168k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+34%

Still filing today

67%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $600 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalRecreation & SportsCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $69k · revenue +147%
  • SJ
    SOUTHERN JEWISH RESOURCE NETWORK INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $7k · revenue +61%
  • CC
    CREATING CONNECTED COMMUNITIES INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $3k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +86%
  • PH
    Piedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -66%
  • ES
    EPSTEIN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
2
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
3
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
4
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
5
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
6
Jgs Administrative Services Inc

To provide administrative support to jgs lifecare corporation.

Health
7
Chelsea Jewish Nursing Home Inc

The organization's mission is to provide individuals throughout the greater boston area with the highest level of skilled nursing, rehabilitation and assisted living services without regard to ability to pay. the goal is to ensure both…

Health
8
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
9
Jewish Nursing Home of Western Massachusetts Inc

To care for the frail, elderly and infirmed according to jewish traditions.

Human Services
10
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
11
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations

Joint Commission evaluates and accredits health care organizations and programs across the United States to ensure compliance with rigorous standards of quality and safety, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)…

Health
12
Chelsea Jewish Community Inc

The organization's mission is to provide the highest level of home health and hospice care services without regard of an individual's ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Repair the World; the most unlike its peers is Time Served. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
21/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC: $68,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INCCREATING CONNECTED COMMUNITIES INC: $3,000 · Human Services+2 more: $525 · Human ServicesAMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMI: $46,580 · OtherAMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION …CONGREGATION OR HADASH INC: $13,389 · OtherCONGREGATION OR HADASH INCCONGREGATION OR VE SHALOM: $4,816 · OtherCONGREGATION OR VE SHALOM+22 more: $4,275 · Other+22 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $32,380 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATIO…+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropyJewish Home Life Communities Inc: $23,100 · Housing & ShelterJewish Home…AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $10,000 · Civil RightsSOUTHERN JEWISH RESOURCE NETWORK INC: $7,090 · Civil RightsPiedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc: $5,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,072 · Health+4 more: $507 · HealthCAMP TWIN LAKES INC: $483 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern University: $25 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$72,025Other$69,060Philanthropy$32,630Housing & Shelter$23,100Civil Rights$17,090Health$6,579Recreation & Sports$508

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC: $68,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $32,380 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Home Life Communities Inc: $23,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN JEWISH RESOURCE NETWORK INC: $7,090 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetPiedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREATING CONNECTED COMMUNITIES INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,072 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTIME SERVED: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP TWIN LAKES INC: $483 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $330 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DESERT SYMPHONY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRALLY FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe William Breman Jewish Home Inc: $207 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Link Counseling Center Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREPAIR THE WORLD: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta IncGA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · Cooper Family Foundation Inc · The Allan & Melanie Nelkin Foundation Inc · Ron and Lisa Brill Charitable Trust · Hookeedoo Foundation Inc · The Stephanie and Blake Selig Family Foundation Inc · Hms Foundation Inc · Harry Heiman Family Foundation · Tim & Lauren Schrager Family Foundation · Rosenberg Family Foundation Inc · The Engel Foundation Inc · The Selig Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cohen Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cohen Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cohen’s filings →

More from the funding graph