Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cloud L Cray and Sara J Cray Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$443k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$3.0MArts & Culture$2.9MHealth$2.5MHuman Services$1.9MReligion$1.0MPhilanthropy$998kRecreation & Sports$434kAnimals$69kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $215k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VALLEY HOPE OF ATCHISON$100,000
ATCHISON COMMUNITY ED FOUNDATION$62,500
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$52,500
Individual grant recipient$40,000
MISSION CREEK CAMP RETREAT CENTER$35,000
ATCHISON AMELIA EARHART FOUNDATION$30,000
MAUR HILL-MOUNT ACADEMY$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
ATCHISON UNITED WAY BOARD$15,000
THEATRE ATCHISON$10,000
ATCHISON FAMILY YMCA$10,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$5,000
ATCHISON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,000
BOY'S GIRL'S CLUB$5,000
HOPE FAMILY THERAPY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YMCA OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $400k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $400k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $200k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $200k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
WY
OH
MO
KY
VA
KS
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 42 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

42 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
11

Total granted

$12M
$1.4M

Still filing today

43%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureAnimalsHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ATCHISON AMELIA EARHART FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.1M · revenue ×14 · 97% of their budget
  • CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $1.0M · revenue +50%
  • TA
    THEATRE ATCHISON INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $400k · revenue +185%

Funded once

  • RF
    ROBBINS FAMILY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $416k
  • LM
    LAIDACKER M & KAREN L SEABERG FAMIL
    one grant, 2022 · $410k
  • KA
    KEN AND CATHY SCROGGS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $361k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Atchison Community Health Clinic Inc

Atchison community health clinic exists to promote wellness by providing quality healthcare to all.

Health
2
Atchison Area Economic Development Corporation Inc

To maintain real estate for the economic development of atchison county, kansas. to provide resources and assistance for continued economic development in atchison county, kansas.

Education
3
Atchison Area Chamber of Commerce

To focus on the quality of life, attraction, growth, and retention of jobs and businesses in atchison county.

—
4
Atchison Community Educational Foundation

Provide funds for the education of at-risk students in the atchison, kansas area

Philanthropy
5
Live Well Live Atchison Inc

To identify our community's greatest needs and then initiate sustainable programs and interventions to improve the health outcomes, quality of life, and economic vitality for the atchison kansas community.

Health
6
Wichita-Sedgwick County Historical Museum Association

To educate the community and its visitors about local history by collecting, preserving and interpreting materials reflecting the heritage of wichita and sedgwick county

Arts & Culture
7
Aveson

Aveson is committed to helping all of our students grow as scholars and future leaders. teachers, called advisors, collaborate with students to identify the choices that are best for them as citizens and scholars.

Education
8
Kittson County Historical Society

Dedicated to the discovery, preservation, and dissemination of knowledge which will esstablish and illustrate the history of kittson county.

—
9
Amberwell Atchison Association

Amberwell health provides compassionate care with clinical excellence.

Health
10
Atchison County Memorial Building Foundation

Preserve and maintain memorial building

Arts & Culture
11
Fort Atkinson Historical Society

Recording, preserving and displaying the history and heritage of fort atkinson.

Arts & Culture
12
Labette County Medical Center

We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Lewis and Clark Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH CENTER: $2,200,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH CENTERCASE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $1,200,000 · OtherCASE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERINGFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $444,700 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHROBBINS FAMILY FOUNDATION: $416,440 · OtherLAIDACKER M & KAREN L SEABERG FAMIL: $409,639 · OtherTHEATRE ATCHISON INC: $400,000 · OtherATCHISON COMMUNITY ED FOUNDATION: $362,500 · OtherKEN AND CATHY SCROGGS FOUNDATION: $361,356 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $325,000 · OtherVALLEY HOPE OF ATCHISON: $300,000 · Other+34 more: $1,875,750 · Other+34 moreATCHISON AMELIA EARHART FOUNDATION: $2,120,000 · Arts & CultureATCHISON AMELIA EA…+1 more: $18,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $1,200,020 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'…CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $1,000,000 · EducationCASE WEST…ATCHISON CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · Education+2 more: $42,500 · EducationATCHISON UNITED WAY BOARD: $220,000 · PhilanthropyTIMBER CREEK HOUSE OF PRAYER INC: $190,000 · ReligionMISSION CREEK CAMP & RETREAT CENTER INC: $185,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$8,295,385Arts & Culture$2,138,000Human Services$1,200,020Education$1,092,500Philanthropy$220,000Religion$190,000Recreation & Sports$185,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetATCHISON AMELIA EARHART FOUNDATION: $2,120,000 over 9y, 97% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $1,200,020 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $1,000,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHEATRE ATCHISON INC: $400,000 over 9y, 22% of budgetATCHISON UNITED WAY BOARD: $220,000 over 9y, 15% of budgetTIMBER CREEK HOUSE OF PRAYER INC: $190,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetMISSION CREEK CAMP & RETREAT CENTER INC: $185,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ATCHISON INC: $69,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetATCHISON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $62,500 over 9y, 14% of budgetHOPE FAMILY THERAPY INC: $54,000 over 7y, 20% of budgetATCHISON CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $50,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetTONGUE RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $50,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetTHE FULLER CENTER: $32,500 over 5y, 17% of budgetAtchison Art Association: $30,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetCASE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $28,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLEWIS AND CLARK TRUST INC: $18,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetSHATTUCK-ST MARY'S SCHOOL: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ATCHISON AMELIA EARHART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THEATRE ATCHISON INC ↗
  • Who funds ATCHISON UNITED WAY BOARD ↗
  • Who funds TIMBER CREEK HOUSE OF PRAYER INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION CREEK CAMP & RETREAT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ATCHISON INC ↗
  • Who funds ATCHISON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FAMILY THERAPY INC ↗
  • Who funds ATCHISON CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TONGUE RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE FULLER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Atchison Art Association ↗
  • Who funds CASE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Courtney S Turner Charitable TrustTX26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Courtney S Turner Charitable Trust · Cloud L Cray Foundation · Laidacker M & Karen L Seaberg Seaberg Family Foundation · Evah C Cray Residuary Charitable Trust Sawmill Trust Company Trustee · Adair-Exchange Bank Foundation · Greater Manhattan Community Foundation · Guy I Bromley Residuary Trust · Muchnic Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Pratt Family Charitable Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cloud L Cray and Sara J Cray Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cloud L Cray and Sara J Cray Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Cloud L Cray and Sara J Cray Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Cloud L Cray and Sara J Cray Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cloud L Cray and Sara J Cray Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph