Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cline Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$34kHealth$25kHousing & Shelter$20kHuman Services$7kAnimals$6kFood & Nutrition$4kYouth Development$3kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,620
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sea Island Habitat for Humanity$10,000
MS Society$5,000
One 80 Place$3,500
Charleston Animal Society$2,620
St Judes Children's Hospital$2,500
Low Country Food Bank$1,000
Shriners Hospitals for Children$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Covenant House: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $250 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $200 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$99k · 13 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
6

Total granted

$99k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+22%

Still filing today

54%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsHousing & ShelterEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    Sea Island Habitat For Humanity Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $11k · revenue +102%
  • OP
    One-Eighty Place
    5× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +81%
  • LF
    LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $4k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jacksonville Humane Society Inc

The jacksonville humane society provides care, comfort and compassion to animals in need while engaging the hearts, hands and minds of our community to bring about an end to the killing of abandoned and orphaned shelter animals.

Animals
2
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
3
Lucky Dog Animal Rescue

Lucky dog animal rescue is a volunteer-powered nonprofit dedicated to rescuing homeless, neglected, and abandoned animals from certain euthanasia and finding them loving forever homes. we educate the community and all pet owners on…

Animals
4
Oregon Humane Society

The oregon humane society ("ohs") is a private animal welfare organization, founded in 1868 and incorporated in 1880, whose mission is to create a more humane society with the vision of a world where all animals are treated with…

Animals
5
Helping Animals Live & Overcome in

Helping animals live and overcome (h.a.l.o.) provides a no-kill safe haven where extraordinary measures are taken to save homeless pets and protect them from abuse and neglect. we continually refine our programs to maintain a 98% save…

Animals
6
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
7
Humane World for Animals Inc

Humane World for Animals, Inc., formerly known as the Humane Society of the United States (The Organization), seeks to tackle the root causes of animal cruelty and suffering. CONTINUED ON SCHEDULE O

Animals
8
Lawrence Humane Society

The lawrence humane society nurtures the human-animal bond by providing shelter, care and advocacy for homeless and abused animals, as well as resource for the pets and people in our community

Animals
9
New Hampshire Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.

Animals
10
Juneau Animal Rescue

To serve our community by promoting animal welfare and strengthening the animal-human bond. to improve the lives of pets through education and protection. to shelter stray, abandoned, and surrendered pets and find them loving homes.

Animals
11
Cheyenne Animal Shelter

The mission of the cheyenne animal shelter is to enhance the quality of life for animals and people through compassion, respect and education.

Animals
12
San Diego Humane Society and Spca

Create a more humane world by inspiring compassion, providing hope and advancing the welfare of animals and people.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pet Helpers Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Kiawah Island Natural Habitat Conservancy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOUNT PLEASANT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $33,450 · OtherMOUNT PLEASANT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHMS SOCIETY: $21,000 · OtherMS SOCIETYSea Island Habitat For Humanity Inc: $11,000 · OtherSea Island Habitat For Humanity IncLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $4,000 · OtherKIAWAH CARES: $4,000 · OtherSt Judes Children's Hospital: $3,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $3,100 · OtherGood Cheer Fund: $3,000 · Other+5 more: $5,450 · Other+5 moreOne-Eighty Place: $6,800 · Housing & ShelterCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $3,620 · AnimalsPET HELPERS INC: $2,050 · AnimalsCOVENANT HOUSE: $2,450 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 · Human ServicesThe Kiawah Island Natural Habitat Conservancy Inc: $1,250 · EnvironmentSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $500 · Health
Other$88,500Housing & Shelter$6,800Animals$5,670Human Services$2,950Environment$1,250Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSea Island Habitat For Humanity Inc: $11,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOne-Eighty Place: $6,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $3,620 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $2,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPET HELPERS INC: $2,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Kiawah Island Natural Habitat Conservancy Inc: $1,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Sea Island Habitat For Humanity Inc ↗
  • Who funds One-Eighty Place ↗
  • Who funds LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds PET HELPERS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Kiawah Island Natural Habitat Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina IncSC13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cline Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cline Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cline Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph