Skip to content
The Clements Foundation Inc Co Alan Wright Cpa PC at a glance

· Private foundation

The Clements Foundation Inc Co Alan Wright Cpa PC

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$75kHuman Services$47kEnvironment$25kYouth Development$23kArts & Culture$10kCommunity Improvement$8kHealth$5kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,750
Median grant
5
States reached
$392k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KEENE VALLEY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION$4,750
MOM'S HOUSE TOLEDO$4,750
THE WILD CENTER$4,750
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF N MI$2,750
CAMP MANITOWISH$2,000
RAVEN HILL DISCOVERY CENTER$2,000
SOUTH BEND CIVIC THEATER$1,750
ST MARGARET'S HOUSE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%MOM'S HOUSE TOLEDO: $5k → 18%MOM'S HOUSE TOLEDO: $4k → 18%HANNAH'S HOUSE: $1k → 13%MOM'S HOUSE TOLEDO: $4k → 18%HANNAH'S HOUSE: $500 → 13%MOM'S HOUSE OF TOLEDO: $3k → 18%MOM'S HOUSE OF TOLEDO: $3k → 18%MOM'S HOUSE OF TOLEDO: $2k → 18%MOM'S HOUSE TOLEDO: $2k → 18%MOM'S HOUSE OF TOLEDO: $1k → 18%FOOD FOR THOUGHT TOLEDO: $3k → 18%INCLUSIVE FOR WOMEN: $2k → 18%FOOD FOR THOUGHT TOLEDO: $1k → 18%FOOD FOR THOUGHT TOLEDO: $1k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$179k · 15 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
9

Total granted

$179k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+36%

Still filing today

87%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +42%
  • MH
    MOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO
    8× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +808%
  • SM
    St Margarets House
    7× · 2019–2025 · $10k · revenue +386%

Funded once

  • AF
    Avow Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +23%
  • MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERINGgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +36%
  • MF
    MISHAWAKA FIRST PRESCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Willow Blossom Learning Center Inc

To provide full day year round quality care for all children aged 6 months to 5 years.

Human Services
2
Little Lighthouse Learning Center

To provide quality preschool, child care and school age care to children ages 3 through 11.

Education
3
Lakeland Children's Center Inc

To provide daycare services to families within the lakeland school district area.

Human Services
4
Montessori Childrens House of Lenawee Inc

Education of young people in the Montessori method

Human Services
5
The Great Lakes Childrens Museum

The museum celebrates learning through play. Exhibits and programs focus on developing self-direction, problem solving, logic and creativity skills in children (particularly ages 1-8) and their caregivers.

Arts & Culture
6
Lake Shore Child Care Center Inc

Child care services for community families

Human Services
7
Bucksport Area Child Care Center

It is our mission to provide a child-centered environment, treating each child and family with respect.

Human Services
8
Lakeshore Childcare Center Inc

Provide Child Care Services

—
9
Mom's House Inc of Lancaster

Empower single parents and their children to set and attain educational goals through parent support and mentorship, early childhood education and safe affordable childcare.

—
10
People Care Inc

Our goal is to have a significant and positive influence on each child in our care.

Human Services
11
Lakewood Child Care Center

Provide educational child care services

Human Services
12
Boys & Girls Clubs of La Porte County Inc

Provide a safe place for youth to develop leadership skills

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Club of the Northern Indiana Corridor Inc; the most unlike its peers is St Margarets House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Keene Valley Library Association: $65,350 · EducationKeene Valley Library AssociationMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $3,800 · EducationMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERINGCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC: $19,500 · OtherCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INCLEADERSHIP SOUTH BENDMISHAWAKA: $5,175 · OtherLEADERSHIP SOUTH BENDMISHA…LAKE PLACID CHILD CARE COMMITTEEINC: $4,000 · OtherLAKE PLACID CHILD CARE COM…WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF N MI: $2,750 · OtherWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF…MISHAWAKA FIRST PRESCHOOL: $2,500 · OtherMISHAWAKA FIRST PRESCHOOLFAMILIES FIRST INC: $2,000 · OtherCROOKED TREE DISTRICT LIBRARY: $2,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INC: $3,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE…+5 more: $5,000 · Other+5 moreMOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO: $23,750 · Human ServicesMOM'S HOUSE INC O…FOOD FOR THOUGHT TOLEDO INC: $4,830 · Human ServicesFOOD FOR THOUGHT …INCLUSIVE FOR WOMEN INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesHANNAH'S HOUSE INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesNATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS: $25,050 · Arts & CultureNATURAL HISTORY M…Raven Hill Discovery Center: $6,000 · Arts & CultureRaven Hill Discov…St Margarets House: $9,500 · Recreation & SportsLAKE PLACID OUTING CLUB INC: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsAvow Foundation Inc: $5,000 · HealthSOUTH BEND CIVIC THEATRE INC: $3,550 · Community Improvement
Education$69,150Other$45,925Human Services$31,580Arts & Culture$31,050Recreation & Sports$13,500Health$5,000Community Improvement$3,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKeene Valley Library Association: $65,350 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetNATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS: $25,050 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO: $23,750 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC: $19,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSt Margarets House: $9,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetRaven Hill Discovery Center: $6,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetAvow Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD FOR THOUGHT TOLEDO INC: $4,830 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetLAKE PLACID CHILD CARE COMMITTEEINC: $4,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $3,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH BEND CIVIC THEATRE INC: $3,550 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES FIRST INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetINCLUSIVE FOR WOMEN INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHANNAH'S HOUSE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLA CASA DE AMISTAD INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

University of Notre D…Judd Leighton Foundat…Community Foundation …Vera Z Dwyer Charitab…The Garatoni-Smith Fa…Carroll F V Char Tr-M…Asante Foundation Inc1st Source Bank Found…Nisource Charitable F…The Blackbaud Giving …Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…
University of Notre Dame du LacIN17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: University of Notre Dame du Lac · Judd Leighton Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · Vera Z Dwyer Charitable Trust Uad 121920 · The Garatoni-Smith Family Foundation · Carroll F V Char Tr-Main · Asante Foundation Inc · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Nisource Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Clements Foundation Inc Co Alan Wright Cpa PC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Clements Foundation Inc Co Alan Wright Cpa PC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Clements Foundation Inc Co Alan Wright Cpa PC?

    Find your warmest path to The Clements Foundation Inc Co Alan Wright Cpa PC through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Clements Foundation Inc Co Alan Wright Cpa PC’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home