Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Clements Foundation Inc Co Alan Wright Cpa PC

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0179% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Education$69kHuman Services$32kArts & Culture$31kRecreation & Sports$14kHealth$5kCommunity Improvement$4kYouth Development$3kPublic Benefit$2kOther$41k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,750
Median grant
5
States reached
$392k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOM'S HOUSE TOLEDO$4,750
KEENE VALLEY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION$4,750
THE WILD CENTER$4,750
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF N MI$2,750
CAMP MANITOWISH$2,000
RAVEN HILL DISCOVERY CENTER$2,000
SOUTH BEND CIVIC THEATER$1,750
ST MARGARET'S HOUSE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%MOM'S HOUSE TOLEDO: $5k → 18%MOM'S HOUSE TOLEDO: $4k → 18%HANNAH'S HOUSE: $1k → 13%MOM'S HOUSE TOLEDO: $4k → 18%HANNAH'S HOUSE: $500 → 13%MOM'S HOUSE OF TOLEDO: $3k → 18%MOM'S HOUSE OF TOLEDO: $3k → 18%MOM'S HOUSE OF TOLEDO: $2k → 18%MOM'S HOUSE TOLEDO: $2k → 18%MOM'S HOUSE OF TOLEDO: $1k → 18%FOOD FOR THOUGHT TOLEDO: $3k → 18%INCLUSIVE FOR WOMEN: $2k → 18%FOOD FOR THOUGHT TOLEDO: $1k → 18%FOOD FOR THOUGHT TOLEDO: $1k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$179k · 15 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
9

Total granted

$179k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+36%

Still filing today

87%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +42%
  • MH
    MOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO
    8× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +808%
  • SM
    St Margarets House
    7× · 2019–2025 · $10k · revenue +386%

Funded once

  • AF
    Avow Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +23%
  • MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERINGgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +36%
  • MF
    MISHAWAKA FIRST PRESCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Willow Blossom Learning Center Inc

To provide full day year round quality care for all children aged 6 months to 5 years.

Human Services
2
Little Lighthouse Learning Center

To provide quality preschool, child care and school age care to children ages 3 through 11.

Education
3
Lakeland Children's Center Inc

To provide daycare services to families within the lakeland school district area.

Human Services
4
Montessori Childrens House of Lenawee Inc

Education of young people in the Montessori method

Human Services
5
The Great Lakes Childrens Museum

The museum celebrates learning through play. Exhibits and programs focus on developing self-direction, problem solving, logic and creativity skills in children (particularly ages 1-8) and their caregivers.

Arts & Culture
6
Lake Shore Child Care Center Inc

Child care services for community families

Human Services
7
Bucksport Area Child Care Center

It is our mission to provide a child-centered environment, treating each child and family with respect.

Human Services
8
Lakeshore Childcare Center Inc

Provide Child Care Services

9
Mom's House Inc of Lancaster

Empower single parents and their children to set and attain educational goals through parent support and mentorship, early childhood education and safe affordable childcare.

10
People Care Inc

Our goal is to have a significant and positive influence on each child in our care.

Human Services
11
Lakewood Child Care Center

Provide educational child care services

Human Services
12
Boys & Girls Clubs of La Porte County Inc

Provide a safe place for youth to develop leadership skills

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Club of the Northern Indiana Corridor Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Margarets House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Keene Valley Library Association — $65,350 · EducationKeene Valley Library AssociationMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING — $3,800 · EducationMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERINGCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC — $19,500 · OtherCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INCLEADERSHIP SOUTH BENDMISHAWAKA — $5,175 · OtherLEADERSHIP SOUTH BENDMISHA…LAKE PLACID CHILD CARE COMMITTEEINC — $4,000 · OtherLAKE PLACID CHILD CARE COM…WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF N MI — $2,750 · OtherWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF…MISHAWAKA FIRST PRESCHOOL — $2,500 · OtherMISHAWAKA FIRST PRESCHOOLFAMILIES FIRST INC — $2,000 · OtherCROOKED TREE DISTRICT LIBRARY — $2,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INC — $3,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE…+5 more — $5,000 · Other+5 moreMOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO — $23,750 · Human ServicesMOM'S HOUSE INC O…FOOD FOR THOUGHT TOLEDO INC — $4,830 · Human ServicesFOOD FOR THOUGHT …HANNAH'S HOUSE INC — $1,500 · Human ServicesINCLUSIVE FOR WOMEN INC — $1,500 · Human ServicesNATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS — $25,050 · Arts & CultureNATURAL HISTORY M…Raven Hill Discovery Center — $6,000 · Arts & CultureRaven Hill Discov…St Margarets House — $9,500 · Recreation & SportsLAKE PLACID OUTING CLUB INC — $4,000 · Recreation & SportsAvow Foundation Inc — $5,000 · HealthSOUTH BEND CIVIC THEATRE INC — $3,550 · Community Improvement
Education$69,150Other$45,925Human Services$31,580Arts & Culture$31,050Recreation & Sports$13,500Health$5,000Community Improvement$3,550

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKeene Valley Library Association — $65,350 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetNATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS — $25,050 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO — $23,750 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC — $19,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSt Margarets House — $9,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetRaven Hill Discovery Center — $6,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetAvow Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD FOR THOUGHT TOLEDO INC — $4,830 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetLAKE PLACID CHILD CARE COMMITTEEINC — $4,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING — $3,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH BEND CIVIC THEATRE INC — $3,550 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES FIRST INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHANNAH'S HOUSE INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINCLUSIVE FOR WOMEN INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLA CASA DE AMISTAD INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

University of Notre Dame du LacIN17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: University of Notre Dame du Lac · Judd Leighton Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · Vera Z Dwyer Charitable Trust Uad 121920 · The Garatoni-Smith Family Foundation · Carroll F V Char Tr-Main · Asante Foundation Inc · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Nisource Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Clements Foundation Inc Co Alan Wright Cpa PC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Clements Foundation Inc Co Alan Wright Cpa PC?

    Find your warmest path to The Clements Foundation Inc Co Alan Wright Cpa PC through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph