· Private foundation
The Clark Family Private Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k47 grants · $80k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $153k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC | $42,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $27,000 |
| CAMP SOUTHERN GROUND INC | $26,500 |
| YALE UNIVERSITY | $15,000 |
| LAMOILLE NORTH MODIFIED UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT | $12,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INCORPORATED | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF TEEN RANCH FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| THE ISAIAH 40 FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| JUPITERFIRST CHURCH INC | $7,750 |
| TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS | $7,000 |
| LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER | $6,375 |
| JONATHANS LANDING CARES INC | $5,000 |
| MCC FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| MY CLINIC INC | $4,500 |
| BELLA'S ANGELS | $4,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $87k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MJMALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC7× · 2017–2024 · $564k · revenue +71%
- CSCAMP SOUTHERN GROUND INC3× · 2022–2024 · $69k · revenue +17%
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC6× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +79%
Funded once
- PIPARAQUAD INCone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -3%
- AFA FAMILY STORYgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +70% · 31% of their budget
- ADANGLICAN DIOCESE IN NEW ENGLANDone grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Suncoast hospice's mission is to be the center to improve life for those touched by advanced illness, death, dying, grief, bereavement and other end-of-life issues.
Lighthouse for the blind of the palm beaches, inc's mission is to assist persons with visual impairments to develop their capabilities to the fullest and to utilize them in the pursuits of life which are the right and privilege of all.
See schedule o for a complete description of the organization's mission
Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)
UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…
Empowerment through employment for blind or visually impaired individuals.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…
Charting a course for living, learning, and earning with vision loss.
Nami palm beach county provides advocacy, education, support, and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.
Suncoast hospice institute is now inactive.
To provide high quality health care to our diverse community enhanced through teaching, research, charity care and financial responsibility.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Speak Up for Kids of Palm Beach County Inc and the most unlike its peers is The New Studio for the Visual Arts of Jupiter Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP SOUTHERN GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC ↗
- Who funds The Isaiah 40 Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MyClinic Inc dba HealthyMe ↗
- Who funds PARAQUAD INC ↗
- Who funds A FAMILY STORY ↗
- Who funds JONATHANS LANDING CARES INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF UNION COLLEGE IN THE TOWN OF SCHENECTADY IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds RENEWAL COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds The New Studio for the Visual Arts of Jupiter Inc ↗
- Who funds Lamoille Area Cancer Network Inc ↗
- Who funds WARRIORS RENEWAL COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT SUNSHINE INC ↗
- Who funds BELLA'S ANGELS INC ↗
- Who funds MCC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MORY'S PRESERVATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE MANHATTAN CHILDRENS CENTER ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN CONGRESS COMMITTEE OF AMERICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · Admirals Cove Foundation Inc · Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · The Mary Alice Fortin Foundation · Children's Healthcare Charity Inc · The Chamber of Nonprofit Health and Human Agencies in Palm Beach County Inc · Quantum Foundation Inc · The Mirasol Foundation Inc · Cultural Council of Palm Beach County Inc · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Clark Family Private Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Gulfstream Goodwill Industries Inc — 27% of income from government
- Adopt-a-Family of the Palm Beaches Inc — 15% of income from government
- Grandmas Place Inc — 12% of income from government
- Saxon Hill School Inc — 11% of income from government
- Loxahatchee River Historical Society Inc — 6% of income from government
- United Way Suncoast Inc — 1% of income from government
- The University of Vermont Medical Center — 1% of income from government
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Palm Beach Symphony Society Inc — 0% of income from government
- Florida Oceanographic Society Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Armory Art Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Kids in Distress Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Clark Family Private Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Clark Family Private Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.